Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Dewa United crest
Dewa United
1 : 0half-time 0:0
PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta

Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dewa United play PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Dewa United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dewa United scores 1.29 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dewa United 41%, PSIM Yogyakarta 53%. Over 2.5: Dewa United 41%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.46. Dewa United: 11.8 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2.

Match halves

Dewa United: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.65. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Dewa United: 16-30 (10 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X) because the metrics indicate balanced chances: Dewa United has home xG of 1.64 versus PSIM’s 1.53 xG on the road, and home goals per match are 1.58 versus 1.46 for away side. PSIM arrive in better scoring form — 11 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Dewa United’s 4, and they average 1.4 points per match in that period versus the hosts’ 1.0. Defensively it is close: hosts concede 1.33 goals at home, visitors concede 1.23 away, but away xG against is 1.59 versus 1.29 for the hosts, suggesting PSIM may rely more on finishing efficiency than on limiting quality chances. The hosts hold an advantage in possession (58% vs 54%), higher average shots (13.5 vs 12.85) and better shot conversion (12% vs 11%), and a lower percentage of goalless matches (25% vs 31%), which gives them the edge in chance creation. Consequently I assign a 40% probability to a draw, 35% to a home win and 25% to an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
6Shots14
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
3Shots on target3
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.91xG1.4
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2Corners4
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
44Dangerous attacks43
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
12Fouls8
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards2
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.29Goals scored / match1.26
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.09Goals conceded / match1.29
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
56%Average possession59%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4.18Shots on target / match4.41
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.79Shots per match13.18
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4.18Shots on target4.41
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
11%Shot conversion9.6%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
56%Possession59%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.46xG for1.57
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.32xG against1.42
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Dewa United: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dewa United is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Dewa United · 1.2 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Dewa United
WWWLL
Season result split
47% W15% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-13
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dewa United is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.09 goals / match - Dewa United · 1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Dewa United scoring profile: strong

Dewa United scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Dewa United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

44Goals scored (season)43
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
37Goals conceded (season)44
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.38Average goals in match2.56
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal74%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
35%2 goals38%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
15%3 goals12%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
6%4 goals3%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
26%2 goals41%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
9%3 goals15%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
3%4 goals3%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
21%Scored in both halves18%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS - last 540%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dewa United is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Dewa United · 1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Dewa United - half-time state
35% leading32% draw32% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.18
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.12Average goals (1st half)0.97
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
59%No goal before half-time65%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
59%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
53%No goal after half-time44%
Dewa UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Dewa United - second-half results

29% W38% R32% P
47
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dewa United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dewa United
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
10
3
16-30
7
10
31-45
9
3
46-60
4
6
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dewa United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Dewa UnitedLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 2.382.80 2.56
Both teams scored 41%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%54% 50%
Clean sheets 29%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 71%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dewa United 0 - 0 - 1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

PSIM Yogyakarta
2 : 0
Dewa United

FAQ

What was the result of Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Dewa United 1:0 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Dewa United score 1.29 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.26. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Dewa United's matches and 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Dewa United and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Dewa United have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The statistical background for Dewa United vs PSIM Yogyakarta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.