Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari: match statistics
Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Diamond Harbour played against Chanmari in I-League (India). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Diamond Harbour has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Chanmari has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Diamond Harbour scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.29. Chanmari scores 1.29 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Diamond Harbour's games and 71% of Chanmari's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 57%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chanmari has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.33 per game. Diamond Harbour takes 8.6 shots per game, while Chanmari takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Diamond Harbour leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 1.29 goals per game after halftime. Chanmari leads at halftime in 57% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Diamond Harbour's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Chanmari, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
I-League games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Diamond Harbour sit 1st and are in excellent form — over the last 5 matches they have 4 wins and 1 draw, yielding 2.6 points per match, whereas Chanmari (5th) have only 1.0 point per match in their last five. The home side have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per match) versus 7 for the visitors (1.4 per match), despite Chanmari showing a higher shot conversion rate 17% vs 13% and averaging slightly more shots (8 vs 7.5). Defensively, Diamond Harbour concede on average 1.0 goal per home match, while Chanmari concede 2.0 goals away; in the last 5 matches the hosts conceded 7 goals (1.4 per match), the visitors 9 (1.8 per match). xG is similar (1.18 xG for the hosts at home vs 1.19 xG for the visitors away), but the hosts’ advantage comes from superior control of the game (possession 57% vs 52%) and markedly better efficiency in recent fixtures, therefore I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome. Season BTTS rates: Diamond Harbour 75% vs Chanmari 67%, league average 66%. Additional support: both teams have BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches. Diamond Harbour averages 13 shots and 5.75 on target with xG 1.72; Chanmari averages 8 shots and 2.67 on target with xG 1.19. Chanmari has 0% clean sheets this season and concedes 2.0 goals on average, increasing the likelihood of a home goal. Hosts concede 1.0 goal on average and have 25% clean sheets this season, but in the last 5 matches Diamond Harbour scored 2.4 goals on average while Chanmari conceded 1.8 in their last 5, so the away side also has a realistic chance to score. Considering 75% vs 67% season BTTS, 80% in the last 5, and Chanmari’s 0% clean sheets, I estimate BTTS at ~80% and No Goal at ~20%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects a total of 2.83 expected goals: 1.46 for Diamond Harbour and 1.37 for Chanmari, calculated as average xG (home xG_for 1.72, away xG_for 1.19; xG_against 1.54 and 1.19 respectively). Diamond Harbour averages 5.75 shots on target versus Chanmari's 2.67, and in the last 5 matches scored an average of 2.4 goals compared to the visitors' 1.4, indicating higher offensive pressure from the hosts. Season-long stats show over 1.5 in 75% of home matches and 100% of away matches (average 87.5%), and over 2.5 in 50%/67% (average 58.5%), so over 1.5 is clearly more reliable than over 2.5. Additionally, BTTS occurs for the hosts in 75% and for the visitors in 67%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. As a result, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 remains a moderate option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics favor Chanmari: the visitors lead at the break in 67% of their season matches, and in the last five fixtures they led at half-time in 80% of cases. Despite this, Chanmari drop significantly defensively after the interval — they concede an average of 2.0 goals in the second half and 100% of their matches have seen second-half goals, while Diamond Harbour scores an average of 1.25 goals after the break (1.6 in the last five matches). Additionally, the hosts create more chances (xG 1.72 versus Chanmari’s 1.19) and have an 80% win rate in their last five home games, indicating an ability to complete a turnaround. On that basis the strongest signal is HT/FT 2/1 — the visitors lead at half-time, but the hosts overturn the deficit and win by full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Diamond Harbour | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Diamond Harbour is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Diamond Harbour · 1 pts / game - Chanmari
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Diamond Harbour is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Diamond Harbour · 1.29 goals / game - Chanmari
Diamond Harbour is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - Diamond Harbour · 1.43 goals / game - Chanmari
Diamond Harbour scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 meczów).
Chanmari scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 meczów), while Diamond Harbour keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Diamond Harbour
Over / Under - Chanmari
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chanmari is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / game - Diamond Harbour · 2.14 pts / game - Chanmari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Diamond Harbour - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chanmari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Diamond Harbour
Chanmari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Diamond Harbour | Liga | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.29 | 2.70 | • 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari?
The I-League match finished Diamond Harbour 3:1 Chanmari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari?
Diamond Harbour score 2.00 goals per game on average and Chanmari 1.29. The I-League average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Diamond Harbour's matches and 71% of Chanmari's.
What form are Diamond Harbour and Chanmari in?
Over the last 5 games Diamond Harbour have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Chanmari 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari?
The statistical background for Diamond Harbour vs Chanmari — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.