Dila vs Meshakhte: match statistics

Dila have a clear advantage at home: they average 1.2 goals per match with an xG of 1.43, while Meshakhte score just 0.9 goals away from home and have an xG of 1.01. The hosts concede 0.9 goals per game, whereas the visitors allow as many as 1.7 goals and have kept a clean sheet in just 10% of their away matches. The difference in chance-creation quality is also reflected in shots on target: Dila average 3.9 at home, compared with just 2.2 for Meshakhte away. Dila’s recent form is not perfect, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches, but Meshakhte have scored only 5 goals during that period and average just 0.8 points per game. With Dila winning 40% of their home matches and Meshakhte losing 60% of their away fixtures, a home win is the most likely outcome.

The BTTS - No pick is primarily based on Dila’s poor attacking consistency: the team averages just 0.5 goals per season and 0.6 goals over their last five matches. Dila have failed to score in 50% of their season matches, while BTTS has not landed in any of their last five outings—an obvious warning sign that the hosts could once again draw a blank. Meshakhte have recorded clean sheets in only 10% of matches and concede an average of 1.7 goals, but Dila manage just 2.1 shots on target per match and convert only 7% of their attempts. The visitors should have chances to score, as Dila concede an average of 1.9 goals, but a Meshakhte-only scoring scenario is more likely than both teams finding the net. Dila’s 50% and Meshakhte’s 70% season BTTS rates support the possibility of a Goal/Goal outcome; however, the hosts’ current attacking struggles ultimately favor BTTS - No.

The match profile points to approximately 2.37 goals: Dila generates an average of 0.91 xG, while Meshakhte allows opponents 1.50 xG; meanwhile, the visitors produce 1.01 xG, with the hosts conceding 1.60 xG. Both defenses are vulnerable to conceding, supporting a scenario with at least two goals, especially as Meshakhte concedes in 90% of matches. At the same time, attacking efficiency remains limited: Dila scores just 0.5 goals on average, Meshakhte 0.9, while over the last five matches the figures were 0.6 and 1.0 goals respectively. The 3.5 line is strongly supported by the season data, as fewer than four goals were scored in 70% of Dila’s matches and 80% of Meshakhte’s. In addition, neither team regularly scores multiple goals on its own, making a total of 1–3 goals the most likely outcome.

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Dila were level after 45 minutes in 70% of their matches, compared with 60% for Meshakhte; over their last five games, these figures stood at 60% and as high as 100%, respectively. The first halves are also expected to be low-scoring: the hosts average 0.2 goals before the break and the visitors 0.3, while Dila have failed to score before half-time in each of their last five appearances. After the interval, Meshakhte should gain the upper hand, as they average 0.6 goals compared with Dila’s 0.3, while the hosts concede 1.1 goals per match after the break. The visitors also have slightly better attacking output over the season as a whole, with an xG of 1.01 versus 0.91 and an average of 0.9 goals scored compared with Dila’s 0.5. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Meshakhte win at full-time best combines the cautious start expected from both teams with the visitors’ greater potential in the second half.