Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dire Dawa Kenema play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Dire Dawa Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.68 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dire Dawa Kenema 39%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Dire Dawa Kenema 29%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.08. Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.7 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.42. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Dire Dawa Kenema: 61-75 (6 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I project a draw (X). Fasil Ketema holds a clear defensive edge and superior league position — 5th versus Dire Dawa’s 14th — reflected in goals conceded averages: 0.67 away for Fasil vs 1.17 conceded by Dire Dawa at home, and clean sheet rates of 58% vs 33%. Hosts dominate possession (57% vs 49%) and register more shots on target per game (3.08 vs 2.64), but conversion rate is only 9% for both, and Dire Dawa fail to score in 58% of home matches. xG indicates a marginal difference in chance quality (1.21 xG for the visitors away vs 1.14 xG for the hosts at home) and both teams have conceded 7 goals in the last 5 games, with Dire Dawa scoring 4 and Fasil 3 in that span. Therefore I expect a low-scoring affair and a split of points, with probability distribution: home 20%, draw 50%, away 30%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
4Shots6
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
2Shots on target1
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
1xG1.01
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
3Corners1
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
82Dangerous attacks77
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
-1Fouls-1
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
-1Cards-1
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.68Goals scored / match0.74
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
1.11Goals conceded / match0.74
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
56%Average possession46%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
2.58Shots on target / match2.24
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.66Shots per match7.24
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
2.58Shots on target2.24
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
10.3%Shot conversion10.2%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
56%Possession46%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
1.08xG for1.14
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
1.18xG against1.1
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Dire Dawa Kenema: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)39%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Dire Dawa Kenema
LLWDW
Season result split
24% W39% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-15-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Dire Dawa Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

26Goals scored (season)28
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
42Goals conceded (season)28
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
1.79Average goals in match1.47
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal58%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
18%2 goals11%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0%3 goals5%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal45%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
32%2 goals21%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
8%3 goals8%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
3%4 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
Dire Dawa Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time8%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
8%Scored in both halves8%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
60%BTTS - last 50%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.84 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Dire Dawa Kenema - half-time state
16% leading37% draw47% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.84Points per match (1st half)1.42
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.26Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.45
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
47%Clean sheet before half-time87%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
74%No goal before half-time71%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
0.89Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
63%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema
68%No goal after half-time63%
Dire Dawa KenemaFasil Ketema

Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dire Dawa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dire Dawa Kenema
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
13
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dire Dawa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Dire Dawa KenemaLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.791.78 1.47
Both teams scored 39%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 18%
Clean sheets 32%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 68%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dire Dawa Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Dire Dawa Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Dire Dawa Kenema 0:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dire Dawa Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

Dire Dawa Kenema score 0.68 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Dire Dawa Kenema's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Dire Dawa Kenema and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Dire Dawa Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dire Dawa Kenema vs Fasil Ketema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.