Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema crest
Dire Dawa Kenema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis suggests a balanced confrontation favoring a draw scenario. Dire Dawa Kenema displays poor home form with only 29% wins and a high rate of 57% of matches without scoring at home. Mebrat Hayl is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per match and recording 50% clean sheets. Both teams have identical form in the last five meetings (1.2 points per match) and a similar draw record. The low shot conversion rate of both teams (11% for hosts, 5% for guests) and the high rate of visitors failing to score (67% FTS%) suggest a low-scoring game where a draw is the most likely result.

Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dire Dawa Kenema play Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 9 January 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Dire Dawa Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.68 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dire Dawa Kenema 39%, Mebrat Hayl 37%. Over 2.5: Dire Dawa Kenema 29%, Mebrat Hayl 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mebrat Hayl has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.08. Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.7 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.0.

Match halves

Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.42. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Dire Dawa Kenema: 61-75 (6 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis suggests a balanced confrontation favoring a draw scenario. Dire Dawa Kenema displays poor home form with only 29% wins and a high rate of 57% of matches without scoring at home. Mebrat Hayl is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.67 goals per match and recording 50% clean sheets. Both teams have identical form in the last five meetings (1.2 points per match) and a similar draw record. The low shot conversion rate of both teams (11% for hosts, 5% for guests) and the high rate of visitors failing to score (67% FTS%) suggest a low-scoring game where a draw is the most likely result.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
7Shots8
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
3Shots on target3
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.86xG0.95
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Corners2
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
28Dangerous attacks32
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
11Fouls13
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0Cards0
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.68Goals scored / match0.84
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.11Goals conceded / match0.68
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
56%Average possession53%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.58Shots on target / match2.21
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.66Shots per match7
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
2.58Shots on target2.21
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
10.3%Shot conversion12%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
56%Possession53%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.08xG for1.12
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.18xG against1.16
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Dire Dawa Kenema: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema
LLWDW
Season result split
24% W39% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-15-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

26Goals scored (season)32
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
42Goals conceded (season)26
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
1.79Average goals in match1.53
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
6Goals scored (last 5)5
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal55%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
18%2 goals18%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%3 goals8%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals3%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal53%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
32%2 goals16%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%3 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
3%4 goals0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
Dire Dawa Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time5%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Scored in both halves11%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
60%BTTS - last 560%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mebrat Hayl is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.84 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema · 1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema - half-time state
16% leading37% draw47% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.84Points per match (1st half)1.29
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.26Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.55
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
47%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
74%No goal before half-time74%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
0.89Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
63%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl
68%No goal after half-time61%
Dire Dawa KenemaMebrat Hayl

Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dire Dawa Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dire Dawa Kenema
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
13
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dire Dawa Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Dire Dawa KenemaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.791.78 1.53
Both teams scored 39%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 26%
Clean sheets 32%40% 47%
Goal before half-time 68%56% 39%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dire Dawa Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Dire Dawa Kenema 0:0 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Dire Dawa Kenema score 0.68 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.84. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Dire Dawa Kenema's matches and 37% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Dire Dawa Kenema and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Dire Dawa Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The statistical background for Dire Dawa Kenema vs Mebrat Hayl — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.