Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Dodoma Jiji presents solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive clean sheet record (50%). The hosts have recorded a streak of four victories in their last five home matches, proving their strength on home turf. Kitayosce faces serious problems in away matches—only 17% wins and as many as 50% losses, with a high FTS rate (50%), indicating frequent difficulties in scoring goals. An additional asset for the hosts is the higher average xG (1.05 vs 0.65) and better shooting accuracy, suggesting greater offensive efficiency. Considering all statistics, Dodoma Jiji holds a clear advantage, although the visitors' form in recent overall matches (2 wins out of 5) warrants caution, hence the inclusion of a potential draw.
Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Dodoma Jiji played against Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on February 12, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Dodoma Jiji has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Kitayosce has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Dodoma Jiji scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.07. Kitayosce scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Dodoma Jiji's games and 36% of Kitayosce's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 36%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Dodoma Jiji has the higher season xG average, 1.15 to 0.96 per game. Dodoma Jiji takes 6.2 shots per game, while Kitayosce takes 5.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Dodoma Jiji leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Kitayosce leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.36 after halftime.
When the teams score
Dodoma Jiji's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Kitayosce, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.78 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Dodoma Jiji presents solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and an impressive clean sheet record (50%). The hosts have recorded a streak of four victories in their last five home matches, proving their strength on home turf. Kitayosce faces serious problems in away matches—only 17% wins and as many as 50% losses, with a high FTS rate (50%), indicating frequent difficulties in scoring goals. An additional asset for the hosts is the higher average xG (1.05 vs 0.65) and better shooting accuracy, suggesting greater offensive efficiency. Considering all statistics, Dodoma Jiji holds a clear advantage, although the visitors' form in recent overall matches (2 wins out of 5) warrants caution, hence the inclusion of a potential draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Dodoma Jiji | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.65 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Dodoma Jiji is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Dodoma Jiji · 1.4 pts / game - Kitayosce
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - Dodoma Jiji · 1 goals / game - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.07 goals / game - Dodoma Jiji · 1 goals / game - Kitayosce
Dodoma Jiji scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 games), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 games).
Kitayosce scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 games), while Dodoma Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dodoma Jiji
Over / Under - Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dodoma Jiji is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - Dodoma Jiji · 0.91 pts / game - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dodoma Jiji - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Dodoma Jiji
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Dodoma Jiji | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.86 | 1.78 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 43% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 36% | 48% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Dodoma Jiji's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kitayosce. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Dodoma Jiji 3:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?
Dodoma Jiji score 0.79 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Dodoma Jiji's matches and 36% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Dodoma Jiji and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Dodoma Jiji have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kitayosce 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dodoma Jiji vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.