Doxa vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
Doxa occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and displays more stable form than MEAP Nisou (7th place). The visitors are on a disastrous run – five consecutive defeats without earning a single point, conceding as many as 15 goals in the process. Doxa has a home record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, which translates to a 30% win rate, but the hosts have an advantage in possession (56%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-2 compared to the visitors' -4 away). Although MEAP Nisou has an identical away win percentage (33%), their dreadful current form and a high average of goals conceded (1.56 per away match) significantly diminish their chances. Considering all statistics, Doxa should capitalize on their home advantage and the opponent's poor form, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the hosts' moderate effectiveness.
Doxa vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Doxa played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Doxa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Doxa scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 0.95. MEAP Nisou scores 1.05 and allows 1.84. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Doxa's games and 53% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 53%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.44 per game. Doxa takes 5.7 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 8.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Doxa leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Doxa's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Doxa occupies a higher position in the table (4th place) and displays more stable form than MEAP Nisou (7th place). The visitors are on a disastrous run – five consecutive defeats without earning a single point, conceding as many as 15 goals in the process. Doxa has a home record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, which translates to a 30% win rate, but the hosts have an advantage in possession (56%) and a better goal difference in home matches (-2 compared to the visitors' -4 away). Although MEAP Nisou has an identical away win percentage (33%), their dreadful current form and a high average of goals conceded (1.56 per away match) significantly diminish their chances. Considering all statistics, Doxa should capitalize on their home advantage and the opponent's poor form, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the hosts' moderate effectiveness.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Doxa | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.25 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.65 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Doxa is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Doxa · 1.05 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Doxa is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.95 goals / game - Doxa · 1.84 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Doxa scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
MEAP Nisou scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Doxa
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Doxa is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Doxa · 1.05 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Doxa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Doxa
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Doxa | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.21 | 2.66 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 29% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- MEAP NisouGoalEric Appiah Ansu
- MEAP NisouGoalEric Appiah Ansu
Head-to-head
Record from Doxa's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against MEAP Nisou. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Doxa 0:2 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
Doxa score 1.26 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.05. The Second Division average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Doxa's matches and 53% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Doxa and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Doxa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Doxa vs MEAP Nisou?
The statistical background for Doxa vs MEAP Nisou — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.