Malaysia - Super LeagueData current as of September 08, 2026

DPMM FC vs PDRM: match statistics

DPMM FC crest
DPMM FC
3 : 1half-time 0:0
PDRM crest
PDRM
165%(1.40)
X20%(4.40)
215%(5.80)

DPMM FC clearly holds the advantage over PDRM in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have won three of their last five matches, scoring 11 goals, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures, conceding a staggering 20 goals. PDRM remains winless on the road this season (0% success rate), and their average of just 0.6 goals per away game—failing to score in 60% of matches—is alarming. DPMM FC boasts a significantly better home scoring record (averaging 1.5 goals) and a higher xG (1.26 vs 0.78). Additionally, the hosts have won 33% of their home games, whereas PDRM have recorded zero away wins. Given the visitors' catastrophic losing streak and the hosts' decent form, a DPMM FC victory is the most likely outcome.

DPMM FC vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

DPMM FC played against PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The game was played on January 3, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

DPMM FC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. PDRM has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

DPMM FC scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 2.67. PDRM scores 0.83 and allows 3.08. Games in this league average 3.39 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of DPMM FC's games and 50% of PDRM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 83%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

DPMM FC has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 0.99 per game. DPMM FC takes 10.7 shots per game, while PDRM takes 7.1.

First-half and second-half trends

DPMM FC leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. PDRM leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.58 after halftime.

When the teams score

DPMM FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For PDRM, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.39 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

DPMM FC clearly holds the advantage over PDRM in terms of form and efficiency. The hosts have won three of their last five matches, scoring 11 goals, while the visitors have lost all five of their recent fixtures, conceding a staggering 20 goals. PDRM remains winless on the road this season (0% success rate), and their average of just 0.6 goals per away game—failing to score in 60% of matches—is alarming. DPMM FC boasts a significantly better home scoring record (averaging 1.5 goals) and a higher xG (1.26 vs 0.78). Additionally, the hosts have won 33% of their home games, whereas PDRM have recorded zero away wins. Given the visitors' catastrophic losing streak and the hosts' decent form, a DPMM FC victory is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
DPMM FCPDRM
20Shots10
DPMM FCPDRM
9Shots on target5
DPMM FCPDRM
2.42xG1.24
DPMM FCPDRM
8Corners4
DPMM FCPDRM
75Dangerous attacks34
DPMM FCPDRM
8Fouls11
DPMM FCPDRM
1Cards1
DPMM FCPDRM

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.25Goals scored / game0.83
DPMM FCPDRM
2.67Goals allowed / game3.08
DPMM FCPDRM
40%Average possession48%
DPMM FCPDRM
3.67Shots on target / game2.75
DPMM FCPDRM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.67Shots per game7.08
DPMM FCPDRM
3.67Shots on target2.75
DPMM FCPDRM
11.7%Shot conversion11.8%
DPMM FCPDRM
40%Possession48%
DPMM FCPDRM
1.23xG for0.99
DPMM FCPDRM
2.35xG against2.05
DPMM FCPDRM

Shooting quality

DPMM FC: BalancedPDRM: Balanced
DPMM FCPDRM
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

DPMM FC
DLWWW
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-6
1.17 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PDRM
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
8% W25% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-8
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 0.75Opponent xG: 2.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

DPMM FC is 51% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - DPMM FC · 0.83 goals / game - PDRM

DPMM FC is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.67 goals / game - DPMM FC · 3.08 goals / game - PDRM

DPMM FC scoring profile: very strong

DPMM FC scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).

PDRM scoring profile: strong

PDRM scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 meczów), while DPMM FC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)10
DPMM FCPDRM
32Goals conceded (season)37
DPMM FCPDRM
3.92Average goals per game3.92
DPMM FCPDRM
11Goals scored (last 5)2
DPMM FCPDRM
6Goals conceded (last 5)20
DPMM FCPDRM

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal50%
DPMM FCPDRM
42%2 goals25%
DPMM FCPDRM
17%3 goals8%
DPMM FCPDRM
8%4 goals0%
DPMM FCPDRM

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal92%
DPMM FCPDRM
67%2 goals83%
DPMM FCPDRM
33%3 goals58%
DPMM FCPDRM
25%4 goals33%
DPMM FCPDRM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
DPMM FCPDRM
8%BTTS in both halves0%
DPMM FCPDRM
17%Scored in both halves17%
DPMM FCPDRM

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
DPMM FCPDRM
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
DPMM FCPDRM
60%BTTS - last 540%
DPMM FCPDRM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
DPMM FCPDRM
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
DPMM FCPDRM
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
DPMM FCPDRM

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
DPMM FCPDRM
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
DPMM FCPDRM
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
DPMM FCPDRM

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

DPMM FC is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / game - DPMM FC · 0.67 pts / game - PDRM

DPMM FC - half-time state
42% leading17% draw42% trailing
PDRM - half-time state
17% leading17% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per game (1st half)0.67
DPMM FCPDRM
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.25
DPMM FCPDRM
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
DPMM FCPDRM
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.5
DPMM FCPDRM
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
DPMM FCPDRM
58%No goal before half-time83%
DPMM FCPDRM

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per game (2nd half)0.58
DPMM FCPDRM
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
DPMM FCPDRM
1.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.83
DPMM FCPDRM
2.17Average goals (2nd half)2.42
DPMM FCPDRM
25%Clean sheet after half-time25%
DPMM FCPDRM
67%No goal after half-time50%
DPMM FCPDRM

DPMM FC - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PDRM - second-half results

17% W8% R75% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding47%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 8%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

DPMM FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.20
Goals scored / game1.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
PDRM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.000.00
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game1.82.2
Average goals per game1.82.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-9-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

DPMM FC
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
1
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
11
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

PDRM
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
1
6
31-45
3
9
46-60
3
5
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

DPMM FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.83
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

PDRM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
165%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

DPMM FCLigaPDRM
Average goals per game 3.923.39 3.92
Both teams scored 42%48% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%65% 83%
Clean sheets 17%28% 8%
Goal before half-time 83%80% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%82% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.39
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.87
Home goals / game
1.52
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
11%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DPMM FCYellow cardJordan Murray
  2. PDRMGoalFakhrul AzimAssist: Tae-Su Park

Head-to-head

Record from DPMM FC's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against PDRM. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

PDRM
2 : 2
DPMM FC

FAQ

What was the result of DPMM FC vs PDRM?

The Super League match finished DPMM FC 3:1 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before DPMM FC vs PDRM?

DPMM FC score 1.25 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.83. The Super League average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 42% of DPMM FC's matches and 50% of PDRM's.

What form are DPMM FC and PDRM in?

Over the last 5 games DPMM FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and PDRM 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for DPMM FC vs PDRM?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.