Dugopolje vs Cibalia: match statistics
Dugopolje vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Dugopolje played against Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The game was played on May 4, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Dugopolje has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Cibalia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Dugopolje scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.00. Cibalia scores 1.46 and allows 0.93. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 39% of Dugopolje's games and 46% of Cibalia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cibalia has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.28 per game. Dugopolje takes 8.3 shots per game, while Cibalia takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Dugopolje leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Cibalia leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Dugopolje's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Cibalia, it is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Druga HNL games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Dugopolje holds a clear advantage at home: 71% home win rate, home goal difference +12, averaging 1.79 goals scored and 0.93 conceded per match with average xG 1.50 versus opponent xG 1.11. Cibalia wins only 31% of away matches, has a negative away goal difference -2, averages 1.08 goals scored and 1.23 conceded per away match and shows lower shot conversion (12% vs hosts’ 18%). Both teams have a similar record in the last 5 matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss and 11 goals scored each), however Cibalia conceded fewer goals in that period (5 vs 7), which does not offset Dugopolje’s home statistical edge. Dugopolje is less likely to be shut out (only in 14% of home matches vs Cibalia’s 23% of away matches) and keeps clean sheets more often (43% vs 38%), which, combined with better shot conversion, increases their chances. Considering the xG advantage, conversion rate and low home loss rate, I tip the home win; probabilities estimated at 65% for 1, 20% for draw, and 15% for 2.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Dugopolje has a strong defense — conceding only 0.71 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of games, while league clean sheets occur in 65% of matches, which weakens the BTTS scenario. The hosts score 1.86 goals per match and have xG_for 1.52 with 10.36 shots and 4.29 on target (conversion 18%), whereas Cibalia scores 1.08 goals seasonally and has xG_for 1.31, so Dugopolje has the greater chance to break the deadlock. Cibalia shows season BTTS 54% and BTTS 60% in the last 5 matches, but their lower conversion 12% and only 3.83 shots on target limit their real offensive effectiveness. Overall (league BTTS 43%, home advantage in conversion and high clean sheet rate) the stronger signal points to No Goal, hence recommendation "No" (58% vs 42%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects Dugopolje at 1.40 expected goals (attacking xG 1.52 vs opponent defensive xG 1.27) and Cibalia at 1.28 (attacking xG 1.31 vs opponent defensive xG 1.24), totaling 2.68 expected goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.68 implies roughly a 75% probability of more than 1.5 goals and about 50% for over 2.5 goals; these figures are reinforced by seasonal data where Dugopolje records Over1.5 in 86% of matches and Cibalia in 54% (average 70%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams produced Over2.5 in 80% of cases and each averaged 2.2 goals across their last five fixtures, so weighting seasonal 50–54% and the xG model yields a higher probability for Over 2.5 (56%). The chance for Over 3.5 is markedly lower: Poisson gives ~28% and seasonal Over3.5 rates are 29% for Dugopolje and 23% for Cibalia, so Over 3.5 is not a strong signal. In summary, the strongest and safest recommendation is Over 1.5 (78%), with a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (56%) as an alternative.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Dugopolje holds a clear advantage: they average 1.86 goals per match versus Cibalia’s 1.08, and concede 0.71 at home compared to 1.23 for the visitors, while home win rate is 64% against 31% for away. In the first half the home side leads in 36% of matches and are level in 50%, averaging 0.64 goals scored and only 0.29 conceded by half-time, indicating control of the opening phase. After the break Dugopolje are even more dangerous: second-half goals average 1.64 for them, they score 1.21 on average in the second half versus 0.62 for the visitors, and 93% of their matches see over 0.5 goals after the break, which favors turnarounds from draws into their lead. Therefore the strongest signal is a home lead at the break and a home win at Full-Time; I estimate HT/FT 1/1 at about 29% (HT/FT X/1 ~22%, HT/FT X/X ~20%), hence I recommend 1/1 as the primary pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Dugopolje | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cibalia is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Dugopolje · 1.46 goals / game - Cibalia
Cibalia is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Dugopolje · 0.93 goals / game - Cibalia
Dugopolje scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 meczów).
Cibalia scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Dugopolje keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dugopolje
Over / Under - Cibalia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cibalia is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - Dugopolje · 1.46 pts / game - Cibalia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dugopolje - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Dugopolje
Cibalia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Dugopolje | Liga | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.25 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 43% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 39% | 40% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 32% | 33% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 66% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Dugopolje's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Cibalia. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Dugopolje vs Cibalia?
The Druga HNL match finished Dugopolje 2:1 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Dugopolje and Cibalia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dugopolje won 1, Cibalia won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Dugopolje vs Cibalia?
Dugopolje score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.46. The Druga HNL average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Dugopolje's matches and 46% of Cibalia's.
What form are Dugopolje and Cibalia in?
Over the last 5 games Dugopolje have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cibalia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dugopolje vs Cibalia?
The statistical background for Dugopolje vs Cibalia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


