Romania - Liga IIData current as of September 13, 2026

Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics

135%(3.40)
X35%(3.30)
230%(2.01)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, strongly pointing towards a draw. Although Dumbrăviţa sits lower in the table (16th place), they perform significantly better at home than Concordia Chiajna does on the road - the hosts have a 22% home win rate compared to just 11% away wins for the visitors. Both teams have shown poor form in their last five matches (Dumbrăviţa: 1.4 PPG, Concordia: 0.6 PPG), suggesting low confidence and potentially cautious gameplay. Concordia has a very high failure to score rate away from home (44% FTS%), limiting their offensive capabilities. Expected goals (xG) are similar for both sides, and the average total goals in matches involving the hosts (2.56) and visitors (2.11) suggests a low-scoring affair, highly conducive to a draw.

Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Dumbrăviţa played against Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Dumbrăviţa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Concordia Chiajna has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Dumbrăviţa scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.65. Concordia Chiajna scores 1.45 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of Dumbrăviţa's games and 45% of Concordia Chiajna's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 40%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Concordia Chiajna has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.18 per game. Dumbrăviţa takes 8.3 shots per game, while Concordia Chiajna takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Dumbrăviţa leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Concordia Chiajna leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.90 after halftime.

When the teams score

Dumbrăviţa's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Concordia Chiajna, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, strongly pointing towards a draw. Although Dumbrăviţa sits lower in the table (16th place), they perform significantly better at home than Concordia Chiajna does on the road - the hosts have a 22% home win rate compared to just 11% away wins for the visitors. Both teams have shown poor form in their last five matches (Dumbrăviţa: 1.4 PPG, Concordia: 0.6 PPG), suggesting low confidence and potentially cautious gameplay. Concordia has a very high failure to score rate away from home (44% FTS%), limiting their offensive capabilities. Expected goals (xG) are similar for both sides, and the average total goals in matches involving the hosts (2.56) and visitors (2.11) suggests a low-scoring affair, highly conducive to a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
8Shots11
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
4Shots on target1
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.18xG1.3
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5Corners5
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
53Dangerous attacks71
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
13Fouls12
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0Cards0
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.2Goals scored / game1.45
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.65Goals allowed / game1.15
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
40%Average possession53%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
3.25Shots on target / game4.55
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.3Shots per game12.8
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
3.25Shots on target4.55
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
14.5%Shot conversion11.3%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
40%Possession53%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.18xG for1.65
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
2.02xG against1.51
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Shooting quality

Dumbrăviţa: Counter-attackingConcordia Chiajna: Balanced
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Dumbrăviţa is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Dumbrăviţa · 0.6 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna

Dumbrăviţa
LLWWD
Season result split
30% W20% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-10
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Concordia Chiajna
LLLLW
Season result split
40% W15% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-9
1.35 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Concordia Chiajna is 21% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - Dumbrăviţa · 1.45 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna

Concordia Chiajna is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.65 goals / game - Dumbrăviţa · 1.15 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna

Dumbrăviţa scoring profile: very strong

Dumbrăviţa scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while Dumbrăviţa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)29
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
33Goals conceded (season)23
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
2.85Average goals per game2.6
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5Goals scored (last 5)5
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal70%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
25%2 goals35%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5%3 goals10%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5%4 goals10%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal70%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
45%2 goals30%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
30%3 goals10%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5%4 goals5%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

45%
Concordia Chiajna - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 20 meczów
50%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time15%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
5%BTTS in both halves0%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
25%Scored in both halves25%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
60%BTTS - last 540%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dumbrăviţa - half-time state
25% leading35% draw40% trailing
Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
25% leading35% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.1
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.55
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.15
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
40%Clean sheet before half-time45%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
45%No goal before half-time60%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)1.55
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.45
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
45%Clean sheet after half-time65%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna
45%No goal after half-time45%
DumbrăviţaConcordia Chiajna

Dumbrăviţa - second-half results

25% W45% D30% L
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

40% W35% D25% L
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Dumbrăviţa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Concordia Chiajna - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Dumbrăviţa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
8
16-30
6
9
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
7
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
0
46-60
11
3
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Dumbrăviţa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.84
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

DumbrăviţaLigaConcordia Chiajna
Average goals per game 2.852.71 2.60
Both teams scored 70%50% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%50% 40%
Clean sheets 20%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 85%74% 80%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DumbrăviţaGoalAlin Şeroni

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna?

The Liga II match finished Dumbrăviţa 1:0 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna?

Dumbrăviţa score 1.20 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 1.45. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Dumbrăviţa's matches and 45% of Concordia Chiajna's.

What form are Dumbrăviţa and Concordia Chiajna in?

Over the last 5 games Dumbrăviţa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna?

The statistical background for Dumbrăviţa vs Concordia Chiajna — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.