Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Dunav 2010 displays absolutely dominant form, leading the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts have won all of their last nine home matches, keeping clean sheets in 89% of their home games and conceding an average of just 0.11 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski, despite being third in the table, performs significantly worse away from home – winning only 40% of their away matches and conceding an average of as many as 1.8 goals per match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.27), and the goal difference in Dunav's home matches (+22) compared to Vihren's away matches (-2) is huge. Considering Dunav 2010's phenomenal home streak and the visitors' clear defensive issues on the road, the hosts are undoubtedly the favorites for this match.
Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Dunav 2010 played against Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on March 1, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Dunav 2010 has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Vihren Sandanski has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Dunav 2010 scores 2.17 goals per game and allows 0.22. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.90 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 22% of Dunav 2010's games and 50% of Vihren Sandanski's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 55%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vihren Sandanski has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.72 per game. Dunav 2010 takes 12.8 shots per game, while Vihren Sandanski takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Dunav 2010 leads at halftime in 78% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. Vihren Sandanski leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Dunav 2010's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). For Vihren Sandanski, it is minutes 0-15 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Dunav 2010 displays absolutely dominant form, leading the table with an impressive record of 16 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses. The hosts have won all of their last nine home matches, keeping clean sheets in 89% of their home games and conceding an average of just 0.11 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski, despite being third in the table, performs significantly worse away from home – winning only 40% of their away matches and conceding an average of as many as 1.8 goals per match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.27), and the goal difference in Dunav's home matches (+22) compared to Vihren's away matches (-2) is huge. Considering Dunav 2010's phenomenal home streak and the visitors' clear defensive issues on the road, the hosts are undoubtedly the favorites for this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Dunav 2010 | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 61% | 62% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Dunav 2010 is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Dunav 2010 · 2 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dunav 2010 is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
2.17 goals / game - Dunav 2010 · 1.9 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Dunav 2010 is 423% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.22 goals / game - Dunav 2010 · 1.15 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Dunav 2010 scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 games), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 games).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 78% (14 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dunav 2010
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dunav 2010 is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / game - Dunav 2010 · 1.65 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dunav 2010 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 78% of games and wins 89%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Dunav 2010
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Dunav 2010 | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.39 | 2.45 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 78% | 33% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Dunav 2010GoalElisée Sou
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Dunav 2010's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Vihren Sandanski. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
The Second League match finished Dunav 2010 2:2 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
Dunav 2010 score 2.17 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.90. The Second League average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Dunav 2010's matches and 50% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Dunav 2010 and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Dunav 2010 have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dunav 2010 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.