Norway - First DivisionEgersund IdrettsparkenData current as of September 07, 2026

Egersund vs Moss: match statistics

Egersund crest
Egersund
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Moss crest
Moss

Egersund vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Egersund played against Moss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on July 4, 2026. Venue: Egersund Idrettsparken. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Egersund has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Moss has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Egersund scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.92. Moss scores 1.77 and allows 2.23. Games in this league average 3.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Egersund's games and 85% of Moss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 77% and 85%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Moss has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.40 per game. Egersund takes 11.4 shots per game, while Moss takes 15.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Egersund leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Moss leads at halftime in 31% and scores 1.08 after halftime.

When the teams score

Egersund's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Moss, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division games average 3.74 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1): Egersund holds a defensive edge at home, conceding on average 1.29 goals at home versus Moss’s 2.57 conceded away. The hosts score 1.57 goals per home match with xG 1.51, while Moss scores 2.00 goals on the road with xG 1.87 and averages 6.71 shots on target, indicating higher attacking quality from the visitors. Egersund’s key advantage is 43% of home matches with a clean sheet versus 0% clean sheets for Moss away; at the same time Moss less frequently finish away matches without scoring (no goal in 14% of away fixtures), whereas the hosts had 43% of home games without scoring. Recent form is poor for both sides: Egersund has 0.6 pts in the last five and only 1 win, Moss has 0.8 pts and also 1 win in their last 5. Considering the hosts’ more stable defense and the visitors’ superior attacking quality, I expect a close match with a slight advantage for Egersund.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams display very high seasonal BTTS rates: Egersund 83% and Moss 86%, while in the last 5 matches BTTS percentages are 80% for the home side and 100% for the away side, indicating a strong Goal/Goal trend. Egersund scores 1.5 and concedes 1.83 per match, whereas Moss scores 2.0 and concedes 2.57; in the last 5 fixtures the home team scored 9 and conceded 17 goals, the visitors scored 10 and conceded 14, confirming both sides are potent in attack but defensively vulnerable. Offensive xG is 1.64 for Egersund and 1.87 for Moss, with xG against at 1.73 and 1.80; additionally, on-target shots of 4.5 and 6.71 and conversion rates of 10% and 13% show scoring opportunities are created by both teams. Low clean sheet expected percentages (17% for the hosts and 0% for the visitors) alongside high rates of matches over 2.5 goals (67% and 100%) and a league-beating BTTS average of 59% increase the likelihood of BTTS - Yes. On this basis I tip BTTS = Yes at 88%, with BTTS - No at 12%, because despite the small chance of a home clean sheet (17%) or a goalless outing from the visitors (14%), the overall numbers and trends strongly support goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model indicates a total expected goals of 3.52: Egersund has xG_for 1.64 against an opponent xG_against of 1.80 → expected ~1.72 goals for the home side, while Moss has xG_for 1.87 against the home xG_against of 1.73 → expected ~1.80 for the away side. Seasonal percentages show a propensity for high-scoring games: Over 1.5 occurred in 83% of Egersund’s matches and 100% of Moss’s matches, Over 2.5 in 67%/100%, and Over 3.5 in 50%/86% respectively. Both teams frequently score in matches (both teams to score in 83% of home matches and 86% of away matches), and in the last 5 games Egersund scored 9 and conceded 17 goals (avg 1.8 scored, 3.4 conceded), while Moss scored 10 and conceded 14 (2.0/2.8). The league average is 3.71 goals per game, and offensive metrics confirm potential for many goals: shots on target 4.5 for home vs 6.71 for away and conversion 10% vs 13%. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5 — high total xG=3.52, Moss’s 100% occurrence of Over 2.5 and both sides’ last 5 matches featuring Over 2.5 provide high confidence in this selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Egersund led at the break in 50% of their home matches, while Moss led away only in 14%, indicating a home advantage after 45 minutes. Moss, however, is significantly more dangerous after the break: the visitors score on average 1.29 goals in the second half versus 0.83 for Egersund, and on the road Moss scored in the second half in 100% of fixtures. Over the full match Moss averages 2.0 goals with xG 1.87, while Egersund has 1.5 goals with xG 1.64, suggesting greater attacking efficiency from the visitors. Both sides score frequently (both teams to score: 83% hosts vs 86% visitors), so a realistic scenario is Moss overturning the deficit. On that basis the strongest signal is Egersund leading at half-time and Moss winning after 90 minutes (1/2) with an assigned probability of 30%; alternatives are 1/1 (16%) and X/2 (14%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
EgersundMoss
12Shots5
EgersundMoss
4Shots on target1
EgersundMoss
1.57xG0.77
EgersundMoss
9Corners0
EgersundMoss
74Dangerous attacks50
EgersundMoss
10Fouls8
EgersundMoss
1Cards1
EgersundMoss

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.62Goals scored / game1.77
EgersundMoss
1.92Goals allowed / game2.23
EgersundMoss
52%Average possession50%
EgersundMoss
3.92Shots on target / game5.69
EgersundMoss

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.38Shots per game15.31
EgersundMoss
3.92Shots on target5.69
EgersundMoss
14.2%Shot conversion11.6%
EgersundMoss
52%Possession50%
EgersundMoss
1.4xG for1.76
EgersundMoss
1.49xG against1.77
EgersundMoss

Shooting quality

Egersund: Efficient finishingMoss: Attacking
EgersundMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Moss is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Egersund · 0.8 pts / game - Moss

Egersund
LLLWL
Season result split
38% W8% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-7
1.23 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Moss
LDWLL
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

1.62 goals / game - Egersund · 1.77 goals / game - Moss

Egersund is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.92 goals / game - Egersund · 2.23 goals / game - Moss

Egersund scoring profile: very strong

Egersund scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)23
EgersundMoss
25Goals conceded (season)29
EgersundMoss
3.54Average goals per game4
EgersundMoss
9Goals scored (last 5)10
EgersundMoss
17Goals conceded (last 5)14
EgersundMoss

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal92%
EgersundMoss
46%2 goals54%
EgersundMoss
23%3 goals23%
EgersundMoss
8%4 goals8%
EgersundMoss

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal92%
EgersundMoss
54%2 goals77%
EgersundMoss
38%3 goals38%
EgersundMoss
23%4 goals15%
EgersundMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time31%
EgersundMoss
15%BTTS in both halves8%
EgersundMoss
31%Scored in both halves23%
EgersundMoss

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS77%
EgersundMoss
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
EgersundMoss
80%BTTS - last 5100%
EgersundMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
EgersundMoss
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
EgersundMoss
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
EgersundMoss

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
EgersundMoss
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
EgersundMoss
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
EgersundMoss

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Egersund is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Egersund · 1.15 pts / game - Moss

Egersund - half-time state
38% leading23% draw38% trailing
Moss - half-time state
31% leading23% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.15
EgersundMoss
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.69
EgersundMoss
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
EgersundMoss
1.69Average goals (1st half)1.77
EgersundMoss
54%Clean sheet before half-time38%
EgersundMoss
54%No goal before half-time54%
EgersundMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per game (2nd half)1.31
EgersundMoss
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
EgersundMoss
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
EgersundMoss
1.85Average goals (2nd half)2.23
EgersundMoss
31%Clean sheet after half-time31%
EgersundMoss
38%No goal after half-time31%
EgersundMoss

Egersund - second-half results

23% W46% R31% P
18
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Moss - second-half results

38% W15% R46% P
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Egersund - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game1.61.8
Average goals per game2.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%100%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Moss - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.6
Average goals per game2.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Egersund
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
5
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Moss
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
8
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.77
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Egersund

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

EgersundLigaMoss
Average goals per game 3.543.74 4.00
Both teams scored 54%59% 85%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%73% 85%
Clean sheets 31%21% 8%
Goal before half-time 77%77% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%88% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.74
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / game
1.57
Away goals / game
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MossYellow cardKristian Strande
  2. EgersundYellow cardOscar Forsmo Kapskarmo
  3. MossSubstitutionOn: Patrik AndersenOff: Jamiu Musbaudeen
  4. EgersundGoalScott VatneAssist: Jan Inge Lynum
  5. EgersundSubstitutionOn: Martin Håheim-ElveseterOff: Scott Vatne

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Egersund's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Moss. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Egersunds IK
2 : 0
Moss FK
Moss FK
2 : 4
Egersunds IK

FAQ

What was the result of Egersund vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Egersund 3:0 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Egersund and Moss?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Egersund won 2, Moss won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Egersund vs Moss?

Egersund score 1.62 goals per game on average and Moss 1.77. The First Division average is 3.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Egersund's matches and 85% of Moss's.

What form are Egersund and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Egersund have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Egersund vs Moss?

The statistical background for Egersund vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.