Egersund vs Moss: match statistics
Egersund vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Egersund play Moss in First Division (Norway). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Egersund Idrettsparken. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Egersund: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Egersund scores 1.71 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Egersund 50%, Moss 79%. Over 2.5: Egersund 79%, Moss 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Moss has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.41. Egersund: 11.4 shots per match, Moss: 14.6.
Match halves
Egersund: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.79. Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Egersund: 31-45+ (6 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
I predict a home win (1): Egersund holds a defensive edge at home, conceding on average 1.29 goals at home versus Moss’s 2.57 conceded away. The hosts score 1.57 goals per home match with xG 1.51, while Moss scores 2.00 goals on the road with xG 1.87 and averages 6.71 shots on target, indicating higher attacking quality from the visitors. Egersund’s key advantage is 43% of home matches with a clean sheet versus 0% clean sheets for Moss away; at the same time Moss less frequently finish away matches without scoring (no goal in 14% of away fixtures), whereas the hosts had 43% of home games without scoring. Recent form is poor for both sides: Egersund has 0.6 pts in the last five and only 1 win, Moss has 0.8 pts and also 1 win in their last 5. Considering the hosts’ more stable defense and the visitors’ superior attacking quality, I expect a close match with a slight advantage for Egersund.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Egersund | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Egersund is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Egersund · 0.8 pts / match - Moss
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Egersund is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.79 goals / match - Egersund · 2.29 goals / match - Moss
Egersund scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Egersund
Over / Under — Moss
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Egersund · 1.07 pts / match - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Egersund
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Egersund | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.50 | 3.75 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Egersund 2 - 0 - 0 Moss. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Egersund vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Egersund 3:0 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Egersund and Moss?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Egersund won 2, Moss won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Egersund vs Moss?
Egersund score 1.71 goals per game on average and Moss 1.64. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Egersund's matches and 79% of Moss's.
What form are Egersund and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Egersund have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Egersund vs Moss?
The statistical background for Egersund vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.