EIF vs JäPS: match statistics
EIF vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
EIF play JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
EIF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
EIF scores 1.40 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: EIF 53%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.22. EIF: 10.3 shots per match, JäPS: 9.5.
Match halves
EIF: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87. JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 50%.
Match description
EIF holds a significant home advantage: at home they average 1.86 goals with 4.57 shots on target per match and a conversion rate of 18%, whereas JäPS away scores 1.00 goal on average, has 3.29 shots on target and a 10% conversion. Defensively the gap is even clearer — EIF concedes 1.14 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 43% of matches, while JäPS concedes 2.14 goals away and records only 29% clean sheets. Both sides have recently struggled defensively: EIF conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches, JäPS 13, with JäPS holding a slightly better recent points return over the last 5 (1.2 points vs EIF’s 0.8). xG data shows a similar volume of created chances (EIF home xG 1.37 vs JäPS away xG 1.15), so EIF’s higher finishing efficiency (18% vs 10%), greater possession (51% vs 41%) and superior shots on target should translate into a home advantage.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JäPS is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - EIF · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - EIF · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS
JäPS is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - EIF · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS
EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — EIF
Over / Under — JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - EIF · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
EIF
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.47 | • 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 45% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 45% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 59% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 74% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): EIF 1 - 2 - 1 JäPS. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of EIF vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 0:1 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between EIF and JäPS?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches EIF won 1, JäPS won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs JäPS?
EIF score 1.40 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 53% of EIF's matches and 27% of JäPS's.
What form are EIF and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and JäPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs JäPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.