Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData current as of September 01, 2026

EIF vs JIPPO: match statistics

EIF crest
EIF
0 : 2half-time 0:0
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

EIF vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

EIF played against JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

EIF has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. JIPPO has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

EIF scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.55. JIPPO scores 1.35 and allows 0.85. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of EIF's games and 45% of JIPPO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.44 per game. EIF takes 11.4 shots per game, while JIPPO takes 13.5.

First-half and second-half trends

EIF leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. JIPPO leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

EIF's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For JIPPO, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

EIF is rated higher primarily due to its current form: it has won 3 of its last 5 matches and conceded only 1 goal during that run. At home, the hosts win 60% of their matches, average 1.5 goals scored, and keep a clean sheet in 40% of their appearances. JIPPO may sit 4th, two places above EIF, and have conceded just 17 goals over the course of the season compared with their opponent’s 31, but their last five matches include 2 defeats and 6 goals conceded. The visitors are dangerous away from home, averaging 1.7 goals scored with a 15% conversion rate, but EIF can take advantage of its current defensive stability. The closely matched xG figures—1.42 for EIF and 1.38 for JIPPO—point to a tight game; however, home advantage gives the hosts a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as EIF concede an average of just 0.5 goals per match, keep a clean sheet in 50% of their games, and have conceded only 1 goal in total across their last five matches. BTTS has landed in just 30% of EIF’s matches this season and not once in their last five appearances, well below the league average of 44%. JIPPO are the more dangerous attacking side, scoring 1.7 goals per match this season, but they have averaged only 1.0 goal recently, and EIF should limit their effectiveness with a solid defensive display. The hosts also do not guarantee a high-scoring game: despite an average xG of 1.89, they score just 1.0 goal per match and convert only 6% of their shots. Therefore, the scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely than both teams finding the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

EIF are very solid defensively, conceding just 0.5 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their games, which limits JIPPO’s attacking potential. In their last five matches, the hosts have conceded only 1 goal, and none of those games produced more than 2 goals. JIPPO score an average of 1.7 goals, but their projection is lower against EIF’s defense; additionally, the visitors create an average of 1.38 xG compared with the 0.86 xG conceded by the hosts over the entire season. Historically, under 3.5 goals has landed in 90% of EIF matches and 70% of JIPPO matches, making Under 3.5 the clear value option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as EIF were level after 45 minutes in 7 of their 10 matches, including 3 of their last 5. The hosts concede just 0.1 goals per match before the break and have kept a clean sheet in the first half in 90% of their games, significantly limiting JIPPO’s chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, however, EIF have stronger foundations for turning the match in their favor: they average 1.89 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.38, and record 5.8 shots on target per match versus JIPPO’s 3.9. Recent form also favors the hosts, who averaged 2.0 points per game across their previous five outings and conceded only 0.2 goals per match during that run, while JIPPO suffered 2 defeats. The X/1 scenario is further supported by the fact that the visitors concede an average of 0.5 goals after half-time, while EIF have scored as many as 5 of their goals between the 76th and 90th minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
EIFJIPPO
15Shots13
EIFJIPPO
3Shots on target6
EIFJIPPO
1.53xG1.64
EIFJIPPO
9Corners3
EIFJIPPO
52Dangerous attacks55
EIFJIPPO
9Fouls12
EIFJIPPO
1Cards3
EIFJIPPO

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.3Goals scored / game1.35
EIFJIPPO
1.55Goals allowed / game0.85
EIFJIPPO
50%Average possession54%
EIFJIPPO
4.2Shots on target / game4.85
EIFJIPPO

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.45Shots per game13.5
EIFJIPPO
4.2Shots on target4.85
EIFJIPPO
11.4%Shot conversion10%
EIFJIPPO
50%Possession54%
EIFJIPPO
1.44xG for1.64
EIFJIPPO
1.48xG against1.09
EIFJIPPO

Shooting quality

EIF: BalancedJIPPO: Balanced
EIFJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

EIF is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - EIF · 1.4 pts / game - JIPPO

EIF
DWWWL
Season result split
40% W10% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-10
1.30 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
JIPPO
DWLLW
Season result split
45% W35% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-4
1.70 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 82% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - EIF · 0.85 goals / game - JIPPO

EIF scoring profile: strong

EIF scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

JIPPO scoring profile: strong

JIPPO scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)27
EIFJIPPO
31Goals conceded (season)17
EIFJIPPO
2.85Average goals per game2.2
EIFJIPPO
5Goals scored (last 5)5
EIFJIPPO
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
EIFJIPPO

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
EIFJIPPO
35%2 goals40%
EIFJIPPO
15%3 goals25%
EIFJIPPO
5%4 goals0%
EIFJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal60%
EIFJIPPO
40%2 goals15%
EIFJIPPO
30%3 goals10%
EIFJIPPO
15%4 goals0%
EIFJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time5%
EIFJIPPO
15%BTTS in both halves5%
EIFJIPPO
20%Scored in both halves10%
EIFJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
EIFJIPPO
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
EIFJIPPO
0%BTTS - last 540%
EIFJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
EIFJIPPO
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
EIFJIPPO
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
EIFJIPPO

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
EIFJIPPO
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
EIFJIPPO
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
EIFJIPPO

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JIPPO is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - EIF · 1.4 pts / game - JIPPO

EIF - half-time state
25% leading45% draw30% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)1.4
EIFJIPPO
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.55
EIFJIPPO
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
EIFJIPPO
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.95
EIFJIPPO
65%Clean sheet before half-time75%
EIFJIPPO
60%No goal before half-time65%
EIFJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)1.5
EIFJIPPO
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
EIFJIPPO
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
EIFJIPPO
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.25
EIFJIPPO
45%Clean sheet after half-time60%
EIFJIPPO
50%No goal after half-time55%
EIFJIPPO

EIF - second-half results

35% W25% R40% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JIPPO - second-half results

35% W45% R20% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

EIF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game0.80.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
JIPPO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

EIF
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
5
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaJIPPO
Average goals per game 2.852.49 2.20
Both teams scored 40%44% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 40%
Clean sheets 35%32% 40%
Goal before half-time 55%63% 55%
Goal after half-time 80%71% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JIPPOYellow cardVictor de Paula
  2. EIFYellow cardOskari Sallinen
  3. JIPPOYellow cardLauri Sahimaa
  4. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Terrence SmithOff: Aleksi Tarvonen
  5. EIFSubstitutionOn: David AgboOff: Mamadou Saidou Bah
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Miro TurunenOff: Jyri Kiuru
  7. EIFSubstitutionOn: Fahad MohamedOff: Oskari Sallinen
  8. JIPPOYellow cardJuho Lehtiranta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from EIF's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses against JIPPO. Games average 3.20 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

JIPPO
1 : 1
EIF
EIF
1 : 2
JIPPO
JIPPO Joensuu
2 : 2
Ekenäs IF
JIPPO Joensuu
3 : 2
Ekenäs IF
Ekenäs IF
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of EIF vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and JIPPO?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches EIF won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs JIPPO?

EIF score 1.30 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.35. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 40% of EIF's matches and 45% of JIPPO's.

What form are EIF and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games EIF have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs JIPPO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.