Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData current as of 23 July 2026

EIF vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics

EIF crest
EIF
3 : 0half-time 2:0
SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia

EIF vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

EIF play SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

EIF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

EIF scores 1.40 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: EIF 53%, SJK Akatemia 27%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, SJK Akatemia 20%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

EIF has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.20. EIF: 10.2 shots per match, SJK Akatemia: 9.3.

Match halves

EIF: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87. SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

EIF has a clear offensive edge at home — averaging 2.67 goals per match and 10.33 shots, 6 on target, versus SJK’s away averages of 1.00 goal, 8 shots and 2 on target. Their finishing efficiency is higher: 26% shot conversion compared to the visitors’ 13%, and average xG is 1.35 for EIF vs 0.99 for SJK, indicating better quality and effectiveness of created chances. The home defense is, however, vulnerable — EIF concedes 1.67 goals at home on average and has conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches, while SJK concedes 1.33 away and just 5 goals in their last five, so the visitors can exploit defensive gaps. Additionally, the hosts have no trouble scoring at home (share of matches without a goal 0%), while SJK are yet to win away (win rate 0%) and record 67% draws on the road, which increases the probability of a point share. Considering the greater quantity and quality of the hosts’ chances and the visitors’ weaker away efficiency, I tip EIF to win; my estimated probabilities are: home 62%, draw 24%, away 14%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
EIFSJK Akatemia
12Shots9
EIFSJK Akatemia
4Shots on target2
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.39xG1.18
EIFSJK Akatemia
5Corners3
EIFSJK Akatemia
50Dangerous attacks66
EIFSJK Akatemia
10Fouls11
EIFSJK Akatemia
0Cards0
EIFSJK Akatemia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.47
EIFSJK Akatemia
2Goals conceded / match1.33
EIFSJK Akatemia
51%Average possession49%
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.93Shots on target / match2.73
EIFSJK Akatemia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.2Shots per match9.27
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.93Shots on target2.73
EIFSJK Akatemia
13.7%Shot conversion5%
EIFSJK Akatemia
51%Possession49%
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.35xG for1.2
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.48xG against1.74
EIFSJK Akatemia

Shooting quality

EIF: Efficient finishingSJK Akatemia: Balanced
EIFSJK Akatemia
Accuracy (shots on target)39%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK Akatemia is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - EIF · 0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia

EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
SJK Akatemia
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W33% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-9
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 198% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - EIF · 0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

SJK Akatemia is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - EIF · 1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia

EIF scoring profile: very strong

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: mixed

SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)7
EIFSJK Akatemia
30Goals conceded (season)20
EIFSJK Akatemia
3.4Average goals in match1.8
EIFSJK Akatemia
3Goals scored (last 5)3
EIFSJK Akatemia
13Goals conceded (last 5)8
EIFSJK Akatemia

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
33%2 goals13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%3 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
7%4 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal87%
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%2 goals40%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%3 goals7%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%4 goals0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%BTTS in both halves0%
EIFSJK Akatemia
27%Scored in both halves0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
EIFSJK Akatemia
60%BTTS - last 540%
EIFSJK Akatemia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
EIFSJK Akatemia
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
EIFSJK Akatemia

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
47%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
EIFSJK Akatemia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

EIF is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - EIF · 0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia

EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
SJK Akatemia - half-time state
7% leading53% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.73
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.07
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.6
EIFSJK Akatemia
53%Clean sheet before half-time60%
EIFSJK Akatemia
60%No goal before half-time93%
EIFSJK Akatemia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.67
EIFSJK Akatemia
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
EIFSJK Akatemia
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
EIFSJK Akatemia
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.2
EIFSJK Akatemia
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
EIFSJK Akatemia
40%No goal after half-time73%
EIFSJK Akatemia

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

7% W47% R47% P
11
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
8
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaSJK Akatemia
Average goals in match 3.402.47 1.80
Both teams scored 53%44% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%44% 20%
Clean sheets 20%31% 13%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 47%
Goal after half-time 93%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): EIF 2 - 0 - 1 SJK Akatemia. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Ekenäs IF
2 : 3
Kerho 07 SJK II
Ekenäs IF
3 : 1
Kerho 07 SJK II
Kerho 07 SJK II
0 : 1
Ekenäs IF

FAQ

What was the result of EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 3:0 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and SJK Akatemia?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches EIF won 2, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

EIF score 1.40 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of EIF's matches and 27% of SJK Akatemia's.

What form are EIF and SJK Akatemia in?

Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs SJK Akatemia?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for EIF vs SJK Akatemia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.