United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: match statistics

El Paso Locomotive crest
El Paso Locomotive
1 : 4half-time 0:2
Lexington crest
Lexington

El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

El Paso Locomotive play Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 31 May 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

El Paso Locomotive: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

El Paso Locomotive scores 1.67 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: El Paso Locomotive 73%, Lexington 64%. Over 2.5: El Paso Locomotive 73%, Lexington 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Lexington has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. El Paso Locomotive: 11.2 shots per match, Lexington: 12.2.

Match halves

El Paso Locomotive: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

El Paso Locomotive: 46-60 (8 goals). Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

El Paso emerges as the favorite: at home they average 2.0 goals per match with 14.5 shots and 6 shots on target, and their home xG is 1.7 versus Lexington’s 1.2 xG on the road. The hosts have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points in that span; Lexington also averages 1.4 points over the last 5, but on the road they register only 0.6 goals per game on average and 0% away wins. El Paso’s defense is, however, vulnerable — at home they concede 2.75 goals per match on average and have no clean sheets (0%), which gives the visitors a chance. Lexington additionally has poor away efficiency: 6% shot conversion, an average of 2.8 shots on target and 40% of away matches without a goal. Considering the clearer chance-creation quality from the hosts (14.5 shots and 1.7 xG) and the visitors’ weak away form, I predict an El Paso victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
8Shots22
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1Shots on target8
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.8xG2.38
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
3Corners7
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
30Dangerous attacks61
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
12Fouls15
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
5Cards2
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.67Goals scored / match1.57
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.67Goals conceded / match1.43
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
49%Average possession51%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
4Shots on target / match4.36
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.2Shots per match12.21
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
4Shots on target4.36
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
14.9%Shot conversion12.9%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
49%Possession51%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.32xG for1.43
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.53xG against1.34
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Shooting quality

El Paso Locomotive: Efficient finishingLexington: Balanced
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.8 pts / match - Lexington

El Paso Locomotive
DDLWL
Season result split
33% W27% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-6
1.27 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Lexington
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

El Paso Locomotive is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.57 goals / match - Lexington

Lexington is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - El Paso Locomotive · 1.43 goals / match - Lexington

El Paso Locomotive scoring profile: very strong

El Paso Locomotive scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while El Paso Locomotive keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

25Goals scored (season)22
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
25Goals conceded (season)20
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
3.33Average goals in match3
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
4Goals scored (last 5)12
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal79%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
53%2 goals36%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
20%3 goals29%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
7%4 goals14%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal71%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
47%2 goals43%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
20%3 goals21%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
13%4 goals7%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

73%
El Paso Locomotive - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time7%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
20%BTTS in both halves0%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
47%Scored in both halves21%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
60%BTTS - last 580%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

El Paso Locomotive - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Lexington - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.36
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.71
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.73Average goals (1st half)1.29
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
40%Clean sheet before half-time64%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%No goal before half-time57%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.07
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.71
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%Clean sheet after half-time36%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington
33%No goal after half-time43%
El Paso LocomotiveLexington

El Paso Locomotive - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
20
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lexington - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

El Paso Locomotive - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

El Paso Locomotive
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

El Paso Locomotive

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

El Paso LocomotiveLigaLexington
Average goals in match 3.332.79 3.00
Both teams scored 73%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%52% 64%
Clean sheets 13%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 87%67% 71%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): El Paso Locomotive 2 - 0 - 0 Lexington. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Lexington SC
1 : 2
El Paso Locomotive FC
El Paso Locomotive FC
2 : 1
Lexington SC

FAQ

What was the result of El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

The USL Championship match finished El Paso Locomotive 1:4 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between El Paso Locomotive and Lexington?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches El Paso Locomotive won 2, Lexington won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

El Paso Locomotive score 1.67 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.57. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 73% of El Paso Locomotive's matches and 64% of Lexington's.

What form are El Paso Locomotive and Lexington in?

Over the last 5 games El Paso Locomotive have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lexington 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for El Paso Locomotive vs Lexington?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.