Germany - 3. LigaData current as of September 13, 2026

Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock: match statistics

138%(2.37)
X32%(3.60)
230%(2.65)

Energie Cottbus sits 2nd in the table and displays solid home form with a 57% win rate, although their last five matches have yielded only 1.8 PPG with three draws. Hansa Rostock, currently 4th, distinguishes itself with superior defensive efficiency in away games (averaging 0.92 goals conceded) and higher possession (55%). The visitors boast an impressive 46% clean sheet rate on the road, making them a difficult opponent. xG statistics are evenly matched (1.75 for the hosts vs 1.68 for the guests), and the goal difference for both teams is similar (12 vs 13). Given Cottbus's recent string of draws and Hansa's defensive solidity, a close encounter is expected, with a slight edge to the hosts due to home advantage.

Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Energie Cottbus played against Hansa Rostock in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Energie Cottbus has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Hansa Rostock has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Energie Cottbus scores 1.96 goals per game and allows 1.44. Hansa Rostock scores 1.74 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 74% of Energie Cottbus's games and 52% of Hansa Rostock's. The Over 2.5 rates are 74% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Hansa Rostock has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.71 per game. Energie Cottbus takes 13.7 shots per game, while Hansa Rostock takes 15.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Energie Cottbus leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. Hansa Rostock leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.89 after halftime.

When the teams score

Energie Cottbus's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). For Hansa Rostock, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3. Liga games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Energie Cottbus sits 2nd in the table and displays solid home form with a 57% win rate, although their last five matches have yielded only 1.8 PPG with three draws. Hansa Rostock, currently 4th, distinguishes itself with superior defensive efficiency in away games (averaging 0.92 goals conceded) and higher possession (55%). The visitors boast an impressive 46% clean sheet rate on the road, making them a difficult opponent. xG statistics are evenly matched (1.75 for the hosts vs 1.68 for the guests), and the goal difference for both teams is similar (12 vs 13). Given Cottbus's recent string of draws and Hansa's defensive solidity, a close encounter is expected, with a slight edge to the hosts due to home advantage.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
6Shots7
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
0Shots on target2
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
0.75xG0.87
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
6Corners3
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
50Dangerous attacks39
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
15Fouls14
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
2Cards0
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.96Goals scored / game1.74
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.44Goals allowed / game1.15
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
50%Average possession56%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
5.85Shots on target / game5.44
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.74Shots per game15.44
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
5.85Shots on target5.44
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
14.3%Shot conversion11.3%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
50%Possession56%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.71xG for1.85
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.52xG against1.27
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Shooting quality

Energie Cottbus: Efficient finishingHansa Rostock: Dominant
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
Accuracy (shots on target)43%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Energie Cottbus is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Energie Cottbus · 1.6 pts / game - Hansa Rostock

Energie Cottbus
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
56% W26% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-5
1.93 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Hansa Rostock
DDLWW
Season result split
44% W37% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-5
1.70 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Energie Cottbus is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.96 goals / game - Energie Cottbus · 1.74 goals / game - Hansa Rostock

Hansa Rostock is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - Energie Cottbus · 1.15 goals / game - Hansa Rostock

Energie Cottbus scoring profile: very strong

Energie Cottbus scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 meczów), while Hansa Rostock keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).

Hansa Rostock scoring profile: very strong

Hansa Rostock scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).

53Goals scored (season)47
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
39Goals conceded (season)31
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
3.41Average goals per game2.89
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal78%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
63%2 goals56%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
37%3 goals26%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
7%4 goals11%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal67%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
41%2 goals37%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
19%3 goals11%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
4%4 goals0%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time33%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
7%BTTS in both halves19%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
41%Scored in both halves48%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
60%BTTS - last 580%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Energie Cottbus is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / game - Energie Cottbus · 1.52 pts / game - Hansa Rostock

Energie Cottbus - half-time state
44% leading37% draw19% trailing
Hansa Rostock - half-time state
33% leading52% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per game (1st half)1.52
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.85
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.44
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
56%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
41%No goal before half-time41%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per game (2nd half)1.63
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
41%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock
33%No goal after half-time33%
Energie CottbusHansa Rostock

Energie Cottbus - second-half results

41% W26% D33% L
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hansa Rostock - second-half results

41% W41% D19% L
41
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Energie Cottbus - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Hansa Rostock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Energie Cottbus
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
9
5
31-45
8
3
46-60
12
9
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Hansa Rostock
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
8
4
16-30
10
8
31-45
7
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.14
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Energie Cottbus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Hansa Rostock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Energie CottbusLigaHansa Rostock
Average goals per game 3.413.10 2.89
Both teams scored 74%63% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 74%63% 63%
Clean sheets 19%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 74%76% 74%
Goal after half-time 89%83% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / game
1.43
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Lukas MichelbrinkOff: Tolga Ciğerci
  2. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Justin ButlerOff: Merveille Biankadi
  3. Hansa RostockSubstitutionOn: Emil HoltenOff: Andreas Voglsammer
  4. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Timmy ThieleOff: Dominik Pelivan
  5. Energie CottbusYellow cardLukas Michelbrink
  6. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Tim CampulkaOff: Erik Engelhardt
  7. Energie CottbusYellow cardLukas Michelbrink

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Energie Cottbus's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Hansa Rostock. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Hansa Rostock
1 : 3
FC Energie Cottbus

FAQ

What was the result of Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock?

The 3. Liga match finished Energie Cottbus 0:0 Hansa Rostock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock?

Energie Cottbus score 1.96 goals per game on average and Hansa Rostock 1.74. The 3. Liga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Energie Cottbus's matches and 52% of Hansa Rostock's.

What form are Energie Cottbus and Hansa Rostock in?

Over the last 5 games Energie Cottbus have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Hansa Rostock 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Energie Cottbus vs Hansa Rostock: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.