Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: match statistics
Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.
Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Energie Cottbus played against Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Energie Cottbus has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ulm has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Energie Cottbus scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.48. Ulm scores 1.31 and allows 2.10. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 72% of Energie Cottbus's games and 72% of Ulm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 72% and 72%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Energie Cottbus has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.44 per game. Energie Cottbus takes 13.7 shots per game, while Ulm takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Energie Cottbus leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.07 goals per game after halftime. Ulm leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Energie Cottbus's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). For Ulm, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Energie Cottbus | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Energie Cottbus is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Energie Cottbus · 0.4 pts / game - Ulm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Energie Cottbus is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.86 goals / game - Energie Cottbus · 1.31 goals / game - Ulm
Energie Cottbus is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.48 goals / game - Energie Cottbus · 2.1 goals / game - Ulm
Energie Cottbus scores in 83% of games (24 of 29 meczów), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
Ulm scores in 86% of games (25 of 29 meczów), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Energie Cottbus
Over / Under - Ulm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Energie Cottbus is 110% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.66 pts / game - Energie Cottbus · 0.79 pts / game - Ulm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Energie Cottbus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ulm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Energie Cottbus
Ulm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Energie Cottbus | Liga | Ulm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.34 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 64% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 72% | 63% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Energie Cottbus's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ulm. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?
The 3. Liga match finished Energie Cottbus 1:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?
Energie Cottbus score 1.86 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.31. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Energie Cottbus's matches and 72% of Ulm's.
What form are Energie Cottbus and Ulm in?
Over the last 5 games Energie Cottbus have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ulm 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?
The statistical background for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.