Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: match statistics

Energie Cottbus crest
Energie Cottbus
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Ulm crest
Ulm
165%(1.71)
X22%(3.70)
213%(3.75)

Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.

Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Energie Cottbus play Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Energie Cottbus: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Ulm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Energie Cottbus scores 1.89 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Ulm scores 1.29 and concedes 2.05. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Energie Cottbus 66%, Ulm 74%. Over 2.5: Energie Cottbus 68%, Ulm 66%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Energie Cottbus has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.43. Energie Cottbus: 13.9 shots per match, Ulm: 11.8.

Match halves

Energie Cottbus: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.08. Ulm: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Energie Cottbus: 76-90+ (17 goals). Ulm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
Energie CottbusUlm
14Shots6
Energie CottbusUlm
2Shots on target2
Energie CottbusUlm
1.52xG0.92
Energie CottbusUlm
9Corners7
Energie CottbusUlm
69Dangerous attacks55
Energie CottbusUlm
7Fouls12
Energie CottbusUlm
0Cards3
Energie CottbusUlm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Energie CottbusUlm
1.89Goals scored / match1.29
Energie CottbusUlm
1.34Goals conceded / match2.05
Energie CottbusUlm
52%Average possession50%
Energie CottbusUlm
5.39Shots on target / match4.05
Energie CottbusUlm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.87Shots per match11.82
Energie CottbusUlm
5.39Shots on target4.05
Energie CottbusUlm
13.7%Shot conversion10.9%
Energie CottbusUlm
52%Possession50%
Energie CottbusUlm
1.68xG for1.43
Energie CottbusUlm
1.44xG against1.67
Energie CottbusUlm

Shooting quality

Energie Cottbus: Efficient finishingUlm: Balanced
Energie CottbusUlm
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Energie Cottbus is 200% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 0.8 pts / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus
WWLWW
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-9-8
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-7-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulm
WLLDL
Season result split
24% W16% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-23
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-11
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Energie Cottbus is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.89 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 1.29 goals / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 2.05 goals / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus scoring profile: very strong

Energie Cottbus scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).

72Goals scored (season)49
Energie CottbusUlm
51Goals conceded (season)78
Energie CottbusUlm
3.24Average goals in match3.34
Energie CottbusUlm
11Goals scored (last 5)7
Energie CottbusUlm
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Energie CottbusUlm

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal87%
Energie CottbusUlm
58%2 goals26%
Energie CottbusUlm
34%3 goals11%
Energie CottbusUlm
8%4 goals3%
Energie CottbusUlm

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal87%
Energie CottbusUlm
37%2 goals55%
Energie CottbusUlm
18%3 goals39%
Energie CottbusUlm
5%4 goals13%
Energie CottbusUlm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time29%
Energie CottbusUlm
8%BTTS in both halves5%
Energie CottbusUlm
42%Scored in both halves11%
Energie CottbusUlm

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Energie CottbusUlm
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Energie CottbusUlm
60%BTTS - last 580%
Energie CottbusUlm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Energie CottbusUlm
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Energie CottbusUlm
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Energie CottbusUlm

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Energie CottbusUlm
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Energie CottbusUlm
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time37%
Energie CottbusUlm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Energie Cottbus is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 0.92 pts / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus - half-time state
42% leading37% draw21% trailing
Ulm - half-time state
16% leading45% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per match (1st half)0.92
Energie CottbusUlm
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Energie CottbusUlm
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Energie CottbusUlm
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.37
Energie CottbusUlm
58%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Energie CottbusUlm
42%No goal before half-time58%
Energie CottbusUlm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.61Points per match (2nd half)0.84
Energie CottbusUlm
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Energie CottbusUlm
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
Energie CottbusUlm
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.97
Energie CottbusUlm
47%Clean sheet after half-time34%
Energie CottbusUlm
32%No goal after half-time45%
Energie CottbusUlm

Energie Cottbus - second-half results

45% W26% R29% P
62
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulm - second-half results

16% W37% R47% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Energie Cottbus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ulm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Energie Cottbus
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
10
8
16-30
12
8
31-45
9
7
46-60
15
10
61-75
17
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
2
10
0-15
8
13
16-30
9
10
31-45
11
11
46-60
5
13
61-75
14
21
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Energie Cottbus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Energie CottbusLigaUlm
Average goals in match 3.243.21 3.34
Both teams scored 66%64% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%64% 66%
Clean sheets 26%21% 13%
Goal before half-time 74%77% 74%
Goal after half-time 87%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Energie Cottbus 1 - 0 - 0 Ulm. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

SSV Ulm 1846
1 : 2
FC Energie Cottbus

FAQ

What was the result of Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

The 3. Liga match finished Energie Cottbus 1:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

Energie Cottbus score 1.89 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.29. The 3. Liga average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Energie Cottbus's matches and 74% of Ulm's.

What form are Energie Cottbus and Ulm in?

Over the last 5 games Energie Cottbus have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Ulm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

The statistical background for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.