Entebbe UPPC vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Entebbe UPPC play Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 18 December 2025 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Entebbe UPPC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Entebbe UPPC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Entebbe UPPC 23%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Entebbe UPPC 17%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.34. Entebbe UPPC: 6.0 shots per match, Kitara: 11.3.

Match halves

Entebbe UPPC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.27. Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Entebbe UPPC: 0-15 (14 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Entebbe UPPCKitara
16Shots20
Entebbe UPPCKitara
3Shots on target7
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.75xG2.63
Entebbe UPPCKitara
2Corners6
Entebbe UPPCKitara
70Dangerous attacks119
Entebbe UPPCKitara
18Fouls16
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0Cards0
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.38
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.67Goals conceded / match0.72
Entebbe UPPCKitara
32%Average possession46%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.37Shots on target / match4.69
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match11.31
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.37Shots on target4.69
Entebbe UPPCKitara
16.7%Shot conversion12.2%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
32%Possession46%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.34xG for1.65
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.6xG against1.31
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Shooting quality

Entebbe UPPC: Counter-attackingKitara: Counter-attacking
Entebbe UPPCKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)23%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.730.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Entebbe UPPC is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC · 1 pts / match - Kitara

Entebbe UPPC
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W30% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-7
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara

Entebbe UPPC is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: mixed

Entebbe UPPC scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: mixed

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).

30Goals scored (season)40
Entebbe UPPCKitara
20Goals conceded (season)21
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1.67Average goals in match2.1
Entebbe UPPCKitara
9Goals scored (last 5)7
Entebbe UPPCKitara
1Goals conceded (last 5)7
Entebbe UPPCKitara

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal76%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
27%2 goals41%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
7%3 goals14%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
7%4 goals7%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal55%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
17%2 goals14%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
3%3 goals3%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0%4 goals0%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time10%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
10%Scored in both halves21%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

BTTS and goal count

10%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
20%BTTS - last 560%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

2nd half

30%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC · 1.93 pts / match - Kitara

Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
27% leading67% draw7% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.93
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.34
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.53Average goals (1st half)1.24
Entebbe UPPCKitara
87%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
67%No goal before half-time38%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Entebbe UPPCKitara
0.47Average goals (2nd half)0.86
Entebbe UPPCKitara
87%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Entebbe UPPCKitara
83%No goal after half-time66%
Entebbe UPPCKitara

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

17% W70% R13% P
44
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Entebbe UPPC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
14
11
0-15
1
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Entebbe UPPCLigaKitara
Average goals in match 1.672.09 2.10
Both teams scored 23%38% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%35% 31%
Clean sheets 53%39% 45%
Goal before half-time 40%59% 76%
Goal after half-time 30%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Entebbe UPPC 0 - 0 - 1 Kitara. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Entebbe UPPC vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Entebbe UPPC 1:0 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Entebbe UPPC vs Kitara?

Entebbe UPPC score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.38. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 23% of Entebbe UPPC's matches and 38% of Kitara's.

What form are Entebbe UPPC and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games Entebbe UPPC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Kitara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Entebbe UPPC vs Kitara?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.