Nigeria - NPFLData current as of September 13, 2026

Enugu Rangers vs Kano Pillars: match statistics

Enugu Rangers crest
Enugu Rangers
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Kano Pillars crest
Kano Pillars
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Enugu Rangers are displaying impressive home form with 73% wins and just 0% losses at their own stadium, along with a very solid goal difference of +13. The hosts dominate in home matches, averaging 1.55 goals scored and only 0.36 goals conceded per game, which confirms 73% clean sheets. Kano Pillars, on the other hand, have catastrophic away form with 82% losses and only 9% wins, scoring an average of just 0.45 goals per match while conceding 1.36. A series of five consecutive losses in recent away matches and a negative goal difference (-10) further weaken the visitors' position. Enugu Rangers' advantage in possession (63% vs 45%), shot accuracy (17% vs 9%), and higher xG (1.69 vs 1.04) clearly point to a home victory.

Enugu Rangers vs Kano Pillars: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Enugu Rangers played against Kano Pillars in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Enugu Rangers has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Kano Pillars has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Enugu Rangers scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 0.87. Kano Pillars scores 0.83 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 39% of Enugu Rangers's games and 35% of Kano Pillars's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 30%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kano Pillars has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.44 per game. Enugu Rangers takes 6.7 shots per game, while Kano Pillars takes 3.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Enugu Rangers leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Kano Pillars leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.30 after halftime.

When the teams score

Enugu Rangers's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Kano Pillars, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NPFL games average 1.83 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Enugu Rangers are displaying impressive home form with 73% wins and just 0% losses at their own stadium, along with a very solid goal difference of +13. The hosts dominate in home matches, averaging 1.55 goals scored and only 0.36 goals conceded per game, which confirms 73% clean sheets. Kano Pillars, on the other hand, have catastrophic away form with 82% losses and only 9% wins, scoring an average of just 0.45 goals per match while conceding 1.36. A series of five consecutive losses in recent away matches and a negative goal difference (-10) further weaken the visitors' position. Enugu Rangers' advantage in possession (63% vs 45%), shot accuracy (17% vs 9%), and higher xG (1.69 vs 1.04) clearly point to a home victory.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
10Shots7
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
5Shots on target3
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
1.4xG1.07
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
12Corners8
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
57Dangerous attacks57
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
19Fouls20
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0Cards3
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Enugu RangersKano Pillars
1.13Goals scored / game0.83
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.87Goals allowed / game1
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
33%Average possession17%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
2.17Shots on target / game0.52
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.7Shots per game3.17
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
2.17Shots on target0.52
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
16.9%Shot conversion26%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
33%Possession17%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
1.44xG for1.55
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
1.33xG against1.41
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Shooting quality

Enugu Rangers: Counter-attackingKano Pillars: Counter-attacking
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
Accuracy (shots on target)32%16%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.49
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.521.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kano Pillars is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Enugu Rangers · 1.8 pts / game - Kano Pillars

Enugu Rangers
LDWWL
Season result split
43% W26% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-7
1.57 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kano Pillars
WWLLW
Season result split
35% W17% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-11
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 2.99BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Enugu Rangers is 36% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Enugu Rangers · 0.83 goals / game - Kano Pillars

Enugu Rangers is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.87 goals / game - Enugu Rangers · 1 goals / game - Kano Pillars

Enugu Rangers scoring profile: strong

Enugu Rangers scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).

Kano Pillars scoring profile: mixed

Kano Pillars scores in 57% of games (13 of 23 meczów), while Enugu Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)19
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
20Goals conceded (season)23
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
2Average goals per game1.83
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal57%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
30%2 goals22%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
9%3 goals4%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
9%4 goals0%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal70%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
30%2 goals26%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0%3 goals4%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0%4 goals0%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

36%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time22%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
22%Scored in both halves9%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
60%BTTS - last 50%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Enugu Rangers is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / game - Enugu Rangers · 1.43 pts / game - Kano Pillars

Enugu Rangers - half-time state
35% leading48% draw17% trailing
Kano Pillars - half-time state
30% leading52% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per game (1st half)1.43
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
1.04Average goals (1st half)0.96
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
70%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
52%No goal before half-time61%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.3
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
0.96Average goals (2nd half)0.87
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
52%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars
61%No goal after half-time74%
Enugu RangersKano Pillars

Enugu Rangers - second-half results

13% W65% D22% L
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kano Pillars - second-half results

22% W39% D39% L
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Enugu Rangers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Kano Pillars - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.41.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Enugu Rangers
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
6
2
16-30
6
5
31-45
0
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kano Pillars
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
5
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Enugu Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Kano Pillars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Enugu RangersLigaKano Pillars
Average goals per game 2.001.83 1.83
Both teams scored 39%36% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%26% 30%
Clean sheets 43%38% 30%
Goal before half-time 61%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.83
Average goals per game
36%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
0.57
Away goals / game
+121%
Home attack advantage
+55%
Home defensive advantage
+44%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Enugu RangersGoalEdedem Essien
  2. Kano PillarsYellow cardMustapha Umar
  3. Kano PillarsGoalMohammed Mukhtar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Enugu Rangers's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kano Pillars. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Kano Pillars
1 : 0
Enugu Rangers

FAQ

What was the result of Enugu Rangers vs Kano Pillars?

The NPFL match finished Enugu Rangers 2:0 Kano Pillars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Enugu Rangers vs Kano Pillars?

Enugu Rangers score 1.13 goals per game on average and Kano Pillars 0.83. The NPFL average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Enugu Rangers's matches and 35% of Kano Pillars's.

What form are Enugu Rangers and Kano Pillars in?

Over the last 5 games Enugu Rangers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kano Pillars 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Enugu Rangers vs Kano Pillars?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.