Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueTonkocheyev StadiumData current as of October 15, 2026

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres: match statistics

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi crest
Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Veres crest
Veres

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi played against Veres in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Venue: Tonkocheyev Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Veres has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. Veres scores 0.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Epitsentr Dunayivtsi's games and 50% of Veres's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi has the higher season xG average, 0.88 to 0.75 per game. Epitsentr Dunayivtsi takes 6.0 shots per game, while Veres takes 5.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Veres leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Veres, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ukrainian Premier League games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi have a clearly stronger current trend: they have collected 8 points from their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 2 draws, while Veres have lost all 5 of their fixtures. The hosts have scored 7 goals during this period and average 1.5 goals per home game, whereas the visitors have yet to score away from home, failing to find the net in 100% of such appearances. Epitsentr’s advantage is also evident in chance creation: the hosts’ average xG stands at 0.88, while Veres generate just 0.63 xG, averaging 4 shots per match compared with the hosts’ 6. Veres’ defense allows opponents 1.87 xG away from home and has failed to keep a clean sheet, which, combined with five consecutive defeats, strongly supports a home win. The risk of a draw remains moderate, as Epitsentr also have a limited sample of home matches and failed to score in 50% of them; however, the visitors’ attacking weakness significantly limits their chances of taking a point.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Veres’s very poor finishing: the team has failed to score on average this season, while in their last 5 matches they have scored just 0.4 goals per game. The visitors have also failed to score in 100% of their matches so far this season, while their average xG is only 0.63, although it increased to 1.03 over the last five. Epitsentr conceded an average of 1.0 goals in their five most recent appearances, but Veres lost all 5 matches during this period and scored only 2 goals in total. Both teams recorded BTTS in 40% of their last five matches, which is below the threshold supporting a Goal/Goal outcome. The hosts should have a chance to score against a team conceding 1.8 goals per match in their recent run, but the most likely scenario is that Veres fails to score again. BTTS - No means that at least one team does not score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projected total of 2.20 goals is primarily driven by Veres’ limited attacking strength, as they scored only 0.4 goals per game in their last 5 matches and averaged just 2 shots on target. Epitsentr scored 1.4 goals per game over the same period, but their average xG was 1.13, which does not indicate the potential to clearly surpass three goals on their own. Both teams had at least three goals in 40% of their matches across their last five appearances, supporting a scenario featuring a 0:1, 1:1 or 2:0 scoreline rather than an open, high-scoring game. Veres did concede 1.8 goals per game during this run, but their opponent scored only 7 goals in total across five matches and did not produce a high tally in every game. The Under 3.5 goals line offers the greatest edge, as it only loses if at least four goals are scored, against an expected total of just 2.20.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario points to a draw at half-time, as Epitsentr were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% for Veres; on average, neither team scored during those first halves. After the break, the advantage should shift to the home side: Epitsentr have recently averaged 1.4 goals in second halves, while Veres have managed only 0.4 and conceded 1.4. The hosts won the second half in 60% of their last five appearances, whereas the visitors lost it in 80% and have suffered five consecutive defeats in all matches. In addition, Epitsentr generate a higher average xG, 0.86 versus 0.63, while Veres’ defense allows opponents 1.87 xG, compared with 1.07 for the hosts. Therefore, the most likely outcome is a cautious 0:0 at half-time, followed by a result in Epitsentr’s favor after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
15Shots7
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
6Shots on target4
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1.68xG0.87
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
7Corners3
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
44Dangerous attacks20
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
10Fouls10
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
2Cards4
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1.5Goals scored / game0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1Goals allowed / game1.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
46%Average possession36%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
3.5Shots on target / game2.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6Shots per game5.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
3.5Shots on target2.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
25%Shot conversion9.1%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
46%Possession36%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0.88xG for0.75
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1.4xG against1.47
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Shooting quality

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi: Counter-attackingVeres: Balanced
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
Accuracy (shots on target)58%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Veres
LL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 0.75Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi is 200% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Epitsentr Dunayivtsi · 0.5 goals / game - Veres

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Epitsentr Dunayivtsi · 1.5 goals / game - Veres

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi scoring profile: very strong

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

Veres scoring profile: mixed

Veres scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Epitsentr Dunayivtsi keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

3Goals scored (season)1
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
2Goals conceded (season)3
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
2.5Average goals per game2
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
3Goals scored (last 5)1
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%2 goals0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%3 goals0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%4 goals0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%2 goals50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%3 goals0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%4 goals0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%Scored in both halves0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%BTTS - last 550%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Epitsentr Dunayivtsi · 0.5 pts / game - Veres

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Veres - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0Goals scored (1st half)0
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
0Average goals (1st half)0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
100%No goal before half-time100%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres
50%No goal after half-time50%
Epitsentr DunayivtsiVeres

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Veres - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.50
Goals scored / game0.01.5
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.02.5
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Veres - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.500.50
Goals scored / game0.00.5
Goals allowed / game0.51.0
Average goals per game0.51.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Veres
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+144%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Epitsentr DunayivtsiLigaVeres
Average goals per game• 2.502.57▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%43%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%57%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%39%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%43%▲ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%79%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per game
43%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.07
Away goals / game
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
43%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VeresYellow cardKonstantinos Stamoulis
  2. Epitsentr DunayivtsiYellow cardIgor Kyryukhantsev
  3. VeresYellow cardDanyil Checher
  4. VeresYellow cardKai Cipot
  5. VeresSubstitutionOn: David NiyoOff: Danyil Checher
  6. Epitsentr DunayivtsiSubstitutionOn: Jon Ceberio AmonarrizOff: Mykola Myronyuk
  7. VeresYellow cardIhor Kharatin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Epitsentr Dunayivtsi's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Veres. Games average 5.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Veres Rivne
3 : 3
FK Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
FK Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
2 : 3
FC Veres Rivne

FAQ

What was the result of Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Epitsentr Dunayivtsi 0:0 Veres. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Epitsentr Dunayivtsi and Veres?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Epitsentr Dunayivtsi won 0, Veres won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres?

Epitsentr Dunayivtsi score 1.50 goals per game on average and Veres 0.50. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Epitsentr Dunayivtsi's matches and 50% of Veres's.

What form are Epitsentr Dunayivtsi and Veres in?

Over the last 5 games Epitsentr Dunayivtsi have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Veres 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres?

The statistical background for Epitsentr Dunayivtsi vs Veres — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.