Hungary - NB IETO ParkData current as of October 21, 2026

ETO vs Honvéd: match statistics

ETO crest
ETO
3 : 2half-time 0:0
Honvéd crest
Honvéd

ETO vs Honvéd: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

ETO played against Honvéd in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: ETO Park. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

ETO has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Honvéd has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

ETO scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.17. Honvéd scores 1.60 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of ETO's games and 80% of Honvéd's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 60%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Honvéd has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.11 per game. ETO takes 8.5 shots per game, while Honvéd takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

ETO leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.17 goals per game after halftime. Honvéd leads at halftime in 60% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

ETO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Honvéd, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ETO sit 3rd, while Honvéd are 9th, and the hosts remain unbeaten after 5 rounds with a record of 2 wins and 3 draws. At home, ETO have won both of their matches so far, scoring an average of 3.5 goals and conceding none, while Honvéd have drawn both away games and conceded 1.5 goals per match. The visitors see more of the ball, 57% compared with 43%, and register more shots, 12.5 versus 9, but their conversion rate is only 12%, compared with ETO’s impressive 39%. Honvéd create reasonably good chances, with an average xG of 1.66, but ETO possess a highly efficient attack and have home advantage. Both teams have similar form over their last five matches, with 1 win, 3 draws and 1 defeat each, but the hosts’ home defensive record provides strong grounds for backing them to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS occurred in 67% of ETO’s matches and in all of Honvéd’s fixtures, compared with the league average of 62%. Neither team has failed to score in a match so far, while their average goals scored stand at 1.67 and 1.50, respectively. Honvéd have not kept a clean sheet yet and concede an average of 1.50 goals, whereas ETO allow 1.67 goals per match on average. Recent form also supports the BTTS scenario: over their last five appearances, the rate was 60% for ETO and 80% for Honvéd, while the visitors both scored and conceded an average of 1.6 goals. ETO have a lower recent attacking xG of 0.91, but their defense allowed opponents 1.84 xG, increasing Honvéd’s chances of finding the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams regularly find the net: ETO average 1.67 goals and Honvéd 1.50, while neither has finished a seasonal match without scoring. Honvéd have yet to keep a clean sheet, and ETO concede an average of 1.67 goals per game, which clearly supports the scenario of at least two goals. In their last five matches, Honvéd scored 1.6 goals and conceded 1.6, while both teams scored in 80% of their games. The combined xG points to approximately 2.78 goals, while the league average of 3.15 and 59% of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals confirm the attacking context. However, the strongest signal is for Over 1.5, as the two-goal threshold is clearly safer than the more balanced 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

ETO have started home matches very strongly: in all three games played so far, they have been leading at the break, scoring an average of 1.33 goals and conceding just 0.33. Honvéd have yet to score before half-time away from home, and both of those matches were level at the break, which further supports the possibility of an early home lead. After the interval, the picture clearly changes, as ETO score just 0.33 goals and concede 1.33, while Honvéd average 1.50 goals in the second half. The visitors also have a slightly higher average xG, 1.66 compared with 1.47, and both teams have drawn 60% of their last five matches. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is ETO leading at half-time and a draw at full-time (1/X).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 2
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
ETOHonvéd
9Shots13
ETOHonvéd
5Shots on target8
ETOHonvéd
1.33xG1.71
ETOHonvéd
3Corners6
ETOHonvéd
56Dangerous attacks46
ETOHonvéd
10Fouls17
ETOHonvéd
1Cards6
ETOHonvéd

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.83Goals scored / game1.6
ETOHonvéd
1.17Goals allowed / game1.6
ETOHonvéd
51%Average possession48%
ETOHonvéd
3.67Shots on target / game5.4
ETOHonvéd

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.5Shots per game12
ETOHonvéd
3.67Shots on target5.4
ETOHonvéd
21.6%Shot conversion13.3%
ETOHonvéd
51%Possession48%
ETOHonvéd
1.11xG for1.54
ETOHonvéd
1.69xG against1.36
ETOHonvéd

Shooting quality

ETO: Efficient finishingHonvéd: Efficient finishing
ETOHonvéd
Accuracy (shots on target)43%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

ETO is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - ETO · 1.2 pts / game - Honvéd

ETO
WDWDL
Season result split
33% W50% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Honvéd
DDDLW
Season result split
20% W60% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ETO is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - ETO · 1.6 goals / game - Honvéd

ETO is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.17 goals / game - ETO · 1.6 goals / game - Honvéd

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Honvéd keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

Honvéd scoring profile: very strong

Honvéd scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

11Goals scored (season)8
ETOHonvéd
7Goals conceded (season)8
ETOHonvéd
3Average goals per game3.2
ETOHonvéd
9Goals scored (last 5)8
ETOHonvéd
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
ETOHonvéd

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal100%
ETOHonvéd
50%2 goals40%
ETOHonvéd
33%3 goals20%
ETOHonvéd
17%4 goals0%
ETOHonvéd

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal80%
ETOHonvéd
33%2 goals60%
ETOHonvéd
17%3 goals20%
ETOHonvéd
0%4 goals0%
ETOHonvéd

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
ETOHonvéd
0%BTTS in both halves20%
ETOHonvéd
33%Scored in both halves20%
ETOHonvéd

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
ETOHonvéd
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ETOHonvéd
40%BTTS - last 580%
ETOHonvéd

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
ETOHonvéd
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
ETOHonvéd
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
ETOHonvéd

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ETOHonvéd
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
ETOHonvéd
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
ETOHonvéd

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Honvéd is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / game - ETO · 2.2 pts / game - Honvéd

ETO - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Honvéd - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per game (1st half)2.2
ETOHonvéd
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.8
ETOHonvéd
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
ETOHonvéd
1Average goals (1st half)1
ETOHonvéd
67%Clean sheet before half-time80%
ETOHonvéd
33%No goal before half-time40%
ETOHonvéd

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)0.6
ETOHonvéd
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
ETOHonvéd
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
ETOHonvéd
2Average goals (2nd half)2.2
ETOHonvéd
50%Clean sheet after half-time20%
ETOHonvéd
50%No goal after half-time40%
ETOHonvéd

ETO - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Honvéd - second-half results

0% W60% D40% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.2

Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

ETO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Honvéd - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.60
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Honvéd
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Honvéd

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

ETOLigaHonvéd
Average goals per game▼ 3.003.23• 3.20
Both teams scored▼ 50%63%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%63%▼ 60%
Clean sheets▲ 33%21%• 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%73%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%78%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HonvédYellow cardÁkos Baki
  2. ETOSubstitutionOn: Marcell Béla HuszárOff: Nfansu Njie
  3. ETOYellow cardNorbert Urblík
  4. HonvédYellow cardReda Eddarraj
  5. HonvédGoalReda Eddarraj
  6. ETOSubstitutionOn: Nicolae RotaruOff: Viktor Đukanović
  7. HonvédSubstitutionOn: Kevin Sydney KantorOff: Kevin Kállai
  8. HonvédSubstitutionOn: Oleksandr SafronovOff: Reda Eddarraj
  9. HonvédYellow cardSzilveszter Hangya
  10. HonvédSubstitutionOn: István Márk PekárOff: Adi Alic
  11. HonvédYellow cardIstván Márk Pekár
  12. HonvédYellow cardOleksandr Safronov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of ETO vs Honvéd?

The NB I match finished ETO 3:2 Honvéd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ETO vs Honvéd?

ETO score 1.83 goals per game on average and Honvéd 1.60. The NB I average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of ETO's matches and 80% of Honvéd's.

What form are ETO and Honvéd in?

Over the last 5 games ETO have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Honvéd 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ETO vs Honvéd?

The statistical background for ETO vs Honvéd — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.