Hungary - NB IETO ParkData current as of October 15, 2026

ETO vs Puskás: match statistics

ETO crest
ETO
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Puskás crest
Puskás

ETO vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

ETO played against Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: ETO Park. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

ETO has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Puskás has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

ETO scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. Puskás scores 1.63 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of ETO's games and 50% of Puskás's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 50%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Puskás has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.25 per game. ETO takes 10.0 shots per game, while Puskás takes 10.0.

First-half and second-half trends

ETO leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Puskás leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

ETO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Puskás, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ETO are top of the table, while Puskás sit second, setting up a closely contested match. Both teams have won 3 of their last 4 games at home and away respectively, but ETO average 2.5 goals at home compared with Puskás’s 1.5 on the road. The hosts convert around 29% of their shots, against 15% for the visitors, which points in ETO’s favor despite their slightly lower xG in these conditions: 1.20 compared with 1.33. ETO’s defense is a concern: they have conceded 8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Puskás have let in just 5, and at home ETO allow opponents chances worth an xG of 1.88. ETO’s finishing and home advantage give the hosts a slight edge, but the visitors’ stronger defense keeps their chances of winning firmly in play.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The recent form supports the prospect of both teams scoring: BTTS has landed in 80% of ETO’s last five matches and 60% of Puskás’s. ETO have averaged 2.2 goals over this period, while Puskás have averaged 2.6; the hosts have conceded 1.6 goals per match and have not kept a clean sheet in the home matches analyzed. ETO’s chances of scoring are backed up by their average of 1.75 goals at home and an xG of 1.20, although Puskás have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away matches. The visitors’ clean-sheet record and away BTTS rate of just 25% reduce confidence in the pick, but the higher league-average BTTS rate of 66% and both teams’ current scoring form tip the assessment towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: all of ETO’s home matches so far have gone over this line, although Puskás have done so in 50% of their away games. ETO score an average of 1.75 goals at home and concede the same number, while Puskás average 1.5 goals per away match. The last five matches for the two teams produced averages of 3.8 and 3.6 goals respectively, while their attacking xG stood at 1.50 and 1.85, supporting a forecast of at least two goals. However, Puskás have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away games, so the Over 2.5 goals line offers a weaker signal than Over 1.5 despite an estimated total of 3.10 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest single scenario is Puskás leading at the break and the visitors winning at full time, although the first-half data is evenly matched, so this is not a decisive pick. In their league matches so far, both teams have led at half-time twice in four games, but ETO have conceded an average of 0.75 goals in the first half, compared with just 0.25 for Puskás, slightly tipping the balance in the visitors’ favor. The advantage for Puskás is clearer over 90 minutes: they have won 3 of 4 matches and conceded an average of 0.75 goals per game, while ETO have won 2 of 4 and conceded 1.75. The hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet and have conceded an average of 1.0 goal in second halves, compared with 0.5 for the visitors, which favors Puskás holding on to any lead. Caution is still warranted, however, as ETO have won 3 of their last 5 matches and were level at half-time in 60% of those games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
ETOPuskás
12Shots14
ETOPuskás
2Shots on target5
ETOPuskás
1.52xG1.62
ETOPuskás
4Corners6
ETOPuskás
85Dangerous attacks53
ETOPuskás
8Fouls25
ETOPuskás
1Cards4
ETOPuskás

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1.63
ETOPuskás
1.25Goals allowed / game1.25
ETOPuskás
50%Average possession49%
ETOPuskás
4.25Shots on target / game4.38
ETOPuskás

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10Shots per game10
ETOPuskás
4.25Shots on target4.38
ETOPuskás
20%Shot conversion16.3%
ETOPuskás
50%Possession49%
ETOPuskás
1.25xG for1.26
ETOPuskás
1.76xG against1.52
ETOPuskás

Shooting quality

ETO: Efficient finishingPuskás: Efficient finishing
ETOPuskás
Accuracy (shots on target)43%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

ETO is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - ETO · 1.8 pts / game - Puskás

ETO
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W38% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-1
1.88 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Puskás
WWLLW
Season result split
63% W0% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-3
1.88 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 away
3-0-1
WWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ETO is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - ETO · 1.63 goals / game - Puskás

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

Puskás scoring profile: very strong

Puskás scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

16Goals scored (season)13
ETOPuskás
10Goals conceded (season)10
ETOPuskás
3.25Average goals per game2.88
ETOPuskás
9Goals scored (last 5)8
ETOPuskás
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
ETOPuskás

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal75%
ETOPuskás
63%2 goals50%
ETOPuskás
38%3 goals38%
ETOPuskás
13%4 goals0%
ETOPuskás

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
ETOPuskás
38%2 goals50%
ETOPuskás
13%3 goals0%
ETOPuskás
0%4 goals0%
ETOPuskás

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
ETOPuskás
0%BTTS in both halves13%
ETOPuskás
25%Scored in both halves38%
ETOPuskás

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ETOPuskás
38%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ETOPuskás
60%BTTS - last 560%
ETOPuskás

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
ETOPuskás
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ETOPuskás
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ETOPuskás

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
ETOPuskás
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ETOPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
ETOPuskás

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Puskás is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / game - ETO · 1.75 pts / game - Puskás

ETO - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing
Puskás - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per game (1st half)1.75
ETOPuskás
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
ETOPuskás
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ETOPuskás
0.75Average goals (1st half)1.5
ETOPuskás
75%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ETOPuskás
50%No goal before half-time50%
ETOPuskás

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per game (2nd half)1.13
ETOPuskás
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
ETOPuskás
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
ETOPuskás
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1.38
ETOPuskás
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ETOPuskás
38%No goal after half-time38%
ETOPuskás

ETO - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Puskás - second-half results

25% W38% D38% L
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

ETO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.00
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.82.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Puskás - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Puskás
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Puskás

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

ETOLigaPuskás
Average goals per game• 3.253.23▼ 2.88
Both teams scored▼ 63%67%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%62%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 25%18%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%67%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%83%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PuskásGoalDaniel Lukacs
  2. PuskásYellow cardMartin Kern
  3. ETOYellow cardMiljan Krpić
  4. PuskásYellow cardGeorgiy Harutyunyan
  5. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Michael OkekeOff: Urho Nissilä
  6. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Zsolt KrupaOff: Pal Dardai
  7. ETOSubstitutionOn: Claudiu Vasile BumbaOff: Bálint Selyem
  8. ETOSubstitutionOn: Modou Lamin MarongOff: Peter Agba
  9. PuskásYellow cardZsolt Krupa
  10. PuskásYellow cardRoland Orján

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from ETO's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Puskás. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of ETO vs Puskás?

The NB I match finished ETO 0:1 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ETO and Puskás?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches ETO won 3, Puskás won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ETO vs Puskás?

ETO score 2.00 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.63. The NB I average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 63% of ETO's matches and 50% of Puskás's.

What form are ETO and Puskás in?

Over the last 5 games ETO have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Puskás 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ETO vs Puskás?

The statistical background for ETO vs Puskás — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.