ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE: match statistics
ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
ETO played against Zalaegerszegi TE in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: ETO Park. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
ETO has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Zalaegerszegi TE has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 0.75 points per game.
Scoring records
ETO scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.25 and allows 2.75. Games in this league average 3.38 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of ETO's games and 25% of Zalaegerszegi TE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 75%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
ETO has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.13 per game. ETO takes 9.7 shots per game, while Zalaegerszegi TE takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
ETO leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Zalaegerszegi TE leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
ETO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Zalaegerszegi TE, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB I games average 3.38 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
ETO sit 5th, while Zalaegerszegi TE are only 11th, and the gap is also reflected in their recent form: the hosts have picked up 6 points from five matches, compared with just 3 for the visitors. ETO have won 100% of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 4 goals and conceding none, whereas Zalaegerszegi have lost both away games, conceding 4 goals per match. The visitors have failed to score in any away fixture, average just 2 shots on target, and create chances worth 0.86 xG, compared with 1.33 xG for the hosts. Although ETO average only 36% possession, their 5 shots on target per match and highly efficient finishing should be enough against a defense that allows an average of 1.83 xG. Zalaegerszegi’s away goal difference stands at -8, making a convincing home win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal is Zalaegerszegi TE’s very poor scoring efficiency: the team has failed to score in the available away data, with average xG of just 0.86. The visitors also failed to score in 100% of those matches, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of their last five games. ETO have recorded 0% clean sheets, but they conceded an average of just 0.8 goals in their last five appearances, while Zalaegerszegi TE scored an average of 1.0 goal. The hosts create significantly more danger, averaging 7.0 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 2.0, while the visitors have conceded 2.8 goals per match in their last five league fixtures. The most likely scenario is therefore one in which ETO score, but Zalaegerszegi TE once again fail to convert their limited chances—supporting BTTS - No / No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
ETO has clear scoring potential, averaging 1.44 xG, while Zalaegerszeg allows opponents 1.83 xG and has conceded an average of 2.8 goals in its last 5 matches. The hosts record an average of 7 shots on target per game compared with just 2 for the visitors, reinforcing the scenario of ETO having the upper hand. Both teams have so far had 100% of their matches finish with at least 2 goals, while the Hungarian league boasts a high average of 3.68 goals per game. Caution around the 2.5 line is warranted because ETO has gone over 2.5 goals in only 20% of its last 5 matches, although Zalaegerszeg’s corresponding figure stands at 80%. The strongest selection therefore remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 2.63 goals provides a solid margin above this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
ETO have a clear quality advantage: their average xG stands at 1.44 compared with Zalaegerszeg’s 0.86, while the hosts average 7 shots on target per match against just 2 for the visitors. Based on the available data, ETO have won 100% of their matches and were leading at the break in their only home game, whereas Zalaegerszeg have lost all of their away matches and were behind at half-time in 100% of them. The defensive form is equally compelling: over their last five matches, ETO conceded an average of 0.8 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 2.8. Zalaegerszeg have failed to score in any of their away matches to date, while they have conceded an average of 2.5 goals after half-time. The most likely scenario is therefore that ETO take the lead before the break and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| ETO | Zalaegerszegi TE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.63 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
ETO is 123% better for: last-5 form.
1.67 pts / game - ETO · 0.75 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ETO is 86% better for: goals scored per game.
2.33 goals / game - ETO · 1.25 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE
ETO is 175% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - ETO · 2.75 goals / game - Zalaegerszegi TE
ETO scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 25% of games (1 of 4 meczów), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ETO
Over / Under - Zalaegerszegi TE
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ETO is 211% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.33 pts / game - ETO · 0.75 pts / game - Zalaegerszegi TE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ETO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
ETO
Zalaegerszegi TE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| ETO | Liga | Zalaegerszegi TE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.33 | 3.38 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardJude Madaki
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from ETO's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Zalaegerszegi TE. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
The NB I match finished ETO 3:0 Zalaegerszegi TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ETO and Zalaegerszegi TE?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ETO won 0, Zalaegerszegi TE won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
ETO score 2.33 goals per game on average and Zalaegerszegi TE 1.25. The NB I average is 3.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of ETO's matches and 25% of Zalaegerszegi TE's.
What form are ETO and Zalaegerszegi TE in?
Over the last 5 games ETO have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Zalaegerszegi TE 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.