Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II: match statistics
Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Excelsior Virton played against KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Stade Yvan Georges. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Excelsior Virton has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KRC Genk II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Excelsior Virton scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.33. KRC Genk II scores 2.50 and allows 2.25. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Excelsior Virton's games and 75% of KRC Genk II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 100%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KRC Genk II has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.33 per game. Excelsior Virton takes 11.3 shots per game, while KRC Genk II takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Excelsior Virton leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Excelsior Virton's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For KRC Genk II, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Excelsior Virton come into this match in clearly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games and scored 11 goals in the process, while KRC Genk II have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats over the same period. The hosts sit higher in the table, in 4th place compared with their opponents’ 7th position, and have conceded just 1 goal in 3 matches this season. Genk II can be dangerous away from home, averaging 2.5 goals and 4.5 shots on target per game, but they also concede as many as 3 goals per match and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Virton average 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors allow opponents an xG of 1.99, which should give the hosts favourable conditions to make the most of home advantage. Virton’s defense is not flawless either, with an average xG against of 1.84, so the most likely outcome is a narrow home win with Genk II finding the net.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is particularly strong on the KRC Genk II side, with this scenario occurring in 100% of their matches this season and the team failing to keep a single clean sheet. The visitors score an average of 2.5 goals, while Excelsior Virton allow opponents an xG of 1.81, making an away goal likely despite the hosts’ strong recent run. Virton, in turn, average 2.5 goals per match, create 1.99 xG and record 7 shots on target, whereas Genk II concede as many as 3.0 goals and 1.99 xG on average. Over their last five matches, both teams scored 2.2 goals per game, but Genk II conceded 10 goals during that period, or 2.0 per match. Virton’s lower 20% BTTS rate in their last five outings and their 50% clean-sheet rate across the season reduce confidence, but the visitors’ weak defense strengthens the BTTS - Yes option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: both teams have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their matches so far this season, and neither has finished a game without scoring. Excelsior Virton score an average of 2.5 goals per match and create chances worth 1.99 xG, while Genk II concede as many as 3.0 goals and allow opponents 1.99 xG. The hosts average 17 shots, including 7 on target, compared with 10 attempts and 4.5 on target for the visitors, further supporting the expectation of at least two goals. Virton’s last five matches were slightly more defensive, with an average of 0.8 goals conceded, but Genk II conceded 2.0 goals per game during this period. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as even a more cautious assessment gives an expected total of 3.30 goals, providing a significant margin above this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Excelsior Virton leading at the break and securing the win, as the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Genk II have suffered 2 defeats during the same period. In their last five matches, Virton were ahead at half-time in 60% of cases and were never trailing at the break, while their opponents conceded an average of 0.8 goals before half-time. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of their attacking play: their average xG stands at 1.99 compared with 1.23 for Genk II, while their average number of shots on target is 7.0 versus 4.5. After the break, the visitors concede an average of 2.0 goals, whereas Virton score 1.0 and concede just 0.5, which supports the likelihood of the hosts maintaining or extending their lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Excelsior Virton | KRC Genk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Excelsior Virton is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Excelsior Virton · 1.5 pts / game - KRC Genk II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KRC Genk II is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Excelsior Virton · 2.5 goals / game - KRC Genk II
Excelsior Virton is 582% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Excelsior Virton · 2.25 goals / game - KRC Genk II
Excelsior Virton scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
KRC Genk II scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Excelsior Virton keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Excelsior Virton
Over / Under - KRC Genk II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Excelsior Virton is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.33 pts / game - Excelsior Virton · 1.75 pts / game - KRC Genk II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Excelsior Virton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KRC Genk II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 25% |
| No goal | 0% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Excelsior Virton
KRC Genk II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Excelsior Virton | Liga | KRC Genk II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.67 | 2.94 | ▲ 4.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 50% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 59% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 27% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 84% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II?
The First Division B match finished Excelsior Virton 3:0 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II?
Excelsior Virton score 1.33 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 2.50. The First Division B average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Excelsior Virton's matches and 75% of KRC Genk II's.
What form are Excelsior Virton and KRC Genk II in?
Over the last 5 games Excelsior Virton have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KRC Genk II 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Excelsior Virton vs KRC Genk II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.