FA Šiauliai vs Banga: match statistics
FA Šiauliai vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FA Šiauliai played against Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
FA Šiauliai has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Banga has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
FA Šiauliai scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 1.83. Banga scores 1.17 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.34 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of FA Šiauliai's games and 0% of Banga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 17%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FA Šiauliai has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.34 per game. FA Šiauliai takes 10.3 shots per game, while Banga takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
FA Šiauliai leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Banga leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
FA Šiauliai's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Banga, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.34 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FA Šiauliai at home are unable to score — on average 0 goals per match and 100% of home games without a goal, while conceding as many as 3.5 goals per game. Banga’s defense on the road is markedly better — only 0.67 conceded goals per away match and 33% clean sheets, with an average of 0.67 goals scored away. The difference in chance quality also favors the visitors: hosts average 5.5 shots per match with 1.0 on target, while Banga average 11.67 shots with 3.67 on target; xG is 0.91 for Šiauliai versus 1.32 for Banga. Although Šiauliai have better recent results overall (1.4 points per match in the last 5 and form 'lldww'), their home record is -7 with no goals scored, which severely limits their prospects of holding a favorable result. On this basis I favor the away win — I predict a Banga victory, with estimated probabilities: home 15%, draw 20%, away 65%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - No — higher probability that at least one team will keep a clean sheet. Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 0% (home 0%, away 0%), and in the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS 20% versus 0% for the away team, strongly indicating a low frequency of both-teams-to-score outcomes. xG metrics show some goal-scoring potential (home xG 1.39 vs away xG 1.32), but finishing efficiency diverges: home shot conversion 14% vs 6% for the away team and average shots on target 4.67 vs 3.67 suggest the home team is more clinical while the away team has limited chance conversion. Additionally, the away team concedes 0.67 goals seasonally, but in the last 5 matches the home side conceded an average 1.8 goals (9 goals in 5), whereas the away team scored only 1.0 goal on average in their last 5, which does not translate into frequent Goal/Goal outcomes. Given both teams’ 0% seasonal BTTS, 0% away BTTS in the last 5 and a high share of clean-sheet matches in the league (77%), I assess BTTS - No at 75% and BTTS - Yes at 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combination of offensive xG 1.39 (FA Šiauliai) and 1.32 (Banga) with defensive xG against 0.97 (home) and 1.12 (away) yields expected goals of about 1.30 for the hosts and 1.12 for the visitors, totaling ~2.42 goals. With aggregate xG ≈2.42 a Poisson distribution indicates roughly a 70% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 44% for a minimum of 3 goals (Over 2.5) and around 23% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). However, seasonal tendencies must be considered: both teams have only 33% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, and Over 2.5 is 33% for Šiauliai and 0% for Banga, suggesting a propensity for low-scoring games. Additionally, the hosts average 1.67 goals seasonally but have scored only 0.6 goals in the last 5 matches with a last5 xG of 1.72, indicating finishing issues (conversion rate 14% for Šiauliai vs 6% for Banga). Overall the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (Over) based on total xG and calculated probabilities, while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely and Over 3.5 has a low probability.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time/Full-Time result of a draw at the break and a home win (X/1), because both teams record a draw at half-time in 67% of their matches. On the season FA Šiauliai averages 1.67 goals per game versus Banga’s 0.67, has the higher xG at 1.39 versus 1.32 and a markedly better shot conversion rate of 14% vs 6%, which suggests the home side is more likely to find the net after the break. By half-time the hosts average 1.33 goals while the visitors average 0.0, so although first halves often end level (67%), the hosts’ qualitative advantage increases the probability of a turnaround in the second half. A cautionary note: over the last five matches the hosts have scored only 0.6 goals and conceded 1.8 on average, explaining the frequent half-time draws, but the season-long scoring metrics and chance conversion favor the hosts returning to win after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FA Šiauliai | Banga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banga is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - FA Šiauliai · 1.17 goals / game - Banga
Banga is 173% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.83 goals / game - FA Šiauliai · 0.67 goals / game - Banga
FA Šiauliai scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
Banga scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 meczów), while FA Šiauliai keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FA Šiauliai
Over / Under - Banga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Banga is 255% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.33 pts / game - FA Šiauliai · 1.17 pts / game - Banga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FA Šiauliai - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FA Šiauliai
Banga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| FA Šiauliai | Liga | Banga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.50 | 2.34 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 41% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 66% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FA Šiauliai's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Banga. Games average 2.75 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
The A Lyga match finished FA Šiauliai 0:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FA Šiauliai and Banga?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches FA Šiauliai won 2, Banga won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
FA Šiauliai score 0.67 goals per game on average and Banga 1.17. The A Lyga average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FA Šiauliai's matches and 0% of Banga's.
What form are FA Šiauliai and Banga in?
Over the last 5 games FA Šiauliai have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Banga 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
The statistical background for FA Šiauliai vs Banga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.