Fafe vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fafe play CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 14 December 2025 at 21:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Fafe: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fafe scores 1.21 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fafe 50%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: Fafe 39%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Fafe has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.14. Fafe: 11.4 shots per match, CD Trofense: 7.7.

Match halves

Fafe: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.71. CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Fafe: 61-75 (7 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FafeCD Trofense
14Shots10
FafeCD Trofense
6Shots on target5
FafeCD Trofense
1.83xG1.29
FafeCD Trofense
6Corners1
FafeCD Trofense
73Dangerous attacks42
FafeCD Trofense
11Fouls12
FafeCD Trofense
6Cards4
FafeCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match0.94
FafeCD Trofense
1.11Goals conceded / match0.97
FafeCD Trofense
53%Average possession51%
FafeCD Trofense
4.43Shots on target / match3.19
FafeCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.43Shots per match7.72
FafeCD Trofense
4.43Shots on target3.19
FafeCD Trofense
10.6%Shot conversion12.1%
FafeCD Trofense
53%Possession51%
FafeCD Trofense
1.48xG for1.14
FafeCD Trofense
1.2xG against1.26
FafeCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Fafe: BalancedCD Trofense: Balanced
FafeCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fafe is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Fafe · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe
WWLLD
Season result split
36% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-9
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fafe is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Fafe · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Fafe · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

Fafe scoring profile: very strong

Fafe scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

CD Trofense scoring profile: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

34Goals scored (season)30
FafeCD Trofense
31Goals conceded (season)31
FafeCD Trofense
2.32Average goals in match1.91
FafeCD Trofense
5Goals scored (last 5)1
FafeCD Trofense
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
FafeCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal56%
FafeCD Trofense
32%2 goals22%
FafeCD Trofense
14%3 goals6%
FafeCD Trofense
4%4 goals6%
FafeCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal75%
FafeCD Trofense
29%2 goals19%
FafeCD Trofense
7%3 goals3%
FafeCD Trofense
4%4 goals0%
FafeCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time19%
FafeCD Trofense
4%BTTS in both halves3%
FafeCD Trofense
18%Scored in both halves16%
FafeCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
FafeCD Trofense
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
FafeCD Trofense
40%BTTS - last 520%
FafeCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FafeCD Trofense
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
FafeCD Trofense
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
FafeCD Trofense

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
FafeCD Trofense
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
FafeCD Trofense
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
FafeCD Trofense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Fafe · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.31
FafeCD Trofense
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.53
FafeCD Trofense
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FafeCD Trofense
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.03
FafeCD Trofense
68%Clean sheet before half-time56%
FafeCD Trofense
61%No goal before half-time59%
FafeCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.06
FafeCD Trofense
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
FafeCD Trofense
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
FafeCD Trofense
1.39Average goals (2nd half)0.88
FafeCD Trofense
50%Clean sheet after half-time53%
FafeCD Trofense
50%No goal after half-time69%
FafeCD Trofense

Fafe - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fafe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fafe
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
7
7
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+184%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fafe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

FafeLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.322.23 1.91
Both teams scored 50%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%40% 31%
Clean sheets 32%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 57%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 86%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fafe 0 - 0 - 1 CD Trofense. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CD Trofense
5 : 1
AD Fafe

FAQ

What was the result of Fafe vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished Fafe 1:2 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fafe vs CD Trofense?

Fafe score 1.21 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 0.94. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Fafe's matches and 47% of CD Trofense's.

What form are Fafe and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games Fafe have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fafe vs CD Trofense?

The statistical background for Fafe vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.