Fafe vs CD Trofense: match statistics
Fafe vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fafe played against CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on December 14, 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Fafe has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CD Trofense has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Fafe scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.08. CD Trofense scores 1.25 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.03 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Fafe's games and 58% of CD Trofense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 33%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fafe has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.29 per game. Fafe takes 11.5 shots per game, while CD Trofense takes 8.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Fafe leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. CD Trofense leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fafe's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For CD Trofense, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 3 games average 2.03 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fafe | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fafe is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Fafe · 0.8 pts / game - CD Trofense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Trofense is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - Fafe · 1.25 goals / game - CD Trofense
CD Trofense is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Fafe · 0.75 goals / game - CD Trofense
Fafe scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
CD Trofense scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fafe
Over / Under - CD Trofense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Trofense is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Fafe · 1.25 pts / game - CD Trofense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fafe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fafe
CD Trofense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| Fafe | Liga | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.17 | 2.03 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 72% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Fafe's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CD Trofense. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Fafe vs CD Trofense?
The Liga 3 match finished Fafe 1:2 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fafe vs CD Trofense?
Fafe score 1.08 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 1.25. The Liga 3 average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Fafe's matches and 58% of CD Trofense's.
What form are Fafe and CD Trofense in?
Over the last 5 games Fafe have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fafe vs CD Trofense?
The statistical background for Fafe vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.