Poland - 3 Liga Group 3Data current as of September 11, 2026

Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój: match statistics

Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Falubaz Zielona Góra played against Goczałkowice Zdrój in 3 Liga Group 3 (Poland). The game was played on April 1, 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Falubaz Zielona Góra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Goczałkowice Zdrój has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Falubaz Zielona Góra scores 2.35 goals per game and allows 0.57. Goczałkowice Zdrój scores 1.65 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 3.27 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of Falubaz Zielona Góra's games and 52% of Goczałkowice Zdrój's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 57%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Falubaz Zielona Góra has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.52 per game. Falubaz Zielona Góra takes 8.8 shots per game, while Goczałkowice Zdrój takes 6.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Falubaz Zielona Góra leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Goczałkowice Zdrój leads at halftime in 4% and scores 0.48 after halftime.

When the teams score

Falubaz Zielona Góra's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (33 goals). For Goczałkowice Zdrój, it is minutes 0-15 (23 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 3 games average 3.27 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Falubaz Zielona Góra is the favorite due to an outstanding home defense — they concede just 0.3 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 70% of matches, whereas Goczałkowice Zdrój concede 1.4 goals per away game on average and have 30% clean sheets. Offensively, the hosts score 2.2 goals per home game on average with an xG of 1.81 and a conversion rate of 17%, while the visitors score 1.5 goals away with xG 1.48 and a 11% conversion. Falubaz also generate more shots and shots on target (12.86 shots per match and 6.43 on target vs 11.0 and 3.6 for the visitors) and have a lower share of goalless matches (20% vs 30%), which increases their probability of converting chances. The only argument for Goczałkowice is recent form in the last five matches — 4 wins and 2.4 points per game versus Falubaz’s 2 wins and 1.6 points — so the visitors can spring a surprise. Summing up the defensive edge, better conversion and superiority in chance creation at the hosts’ ground, I tip a Falubaz victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS rates of 54% (Falubaz) and 50% (Goczałkowice), while the league BTTS level is 60%, indicating an overall trend favoring both teams scoring. xG analysis: Falubaz average xG is 1.54 versus xG against Goczałkowice 1.13 – the average of these values is approximately 1.33 expected goals for Falubaz; meanwhile Goczałkowice average xG 1.48 and xG against Falubaz 1.46 yield about 1.47 expected goals for the away side. Shot volume and conversion confirm this: Falubaz averages 9.73 shots with 13% conversion (~1.26 goals), Goczałkowice 11.0 shots with 11% (~1.21 goals), and season goal averages are 1.77 and 1.5, so both sides regularly generate goals. Counter signals appear in short-term form – last 5 matches show BTTS 40% for Falubaz and 20% for Goczałkowice and the visitors conceded on average 0.4 goals in that period – however this is a weaker signal compared to longer-term season stats and xG. Therefore I forecast 64% for BTTS = Yes and 36% for BTTS = No, selecting 'Yes' as the strongest signal based on xG, season goal averages and the high league BTTS rate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: Falubaz 69% of the season, Goczałkowice 80%, and the league averages 3.23 goals per match. Based on xG the estimate is 1.34 xG for the home side (attacking xG 1.54 vs opponent xG against 1.13) and 1.47 xG for the visitors (attacking xG 1.48 vs home xG against 1.46), totaling 2.81 expected goals. With combined xG=2.81 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 77%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 53%, and 4+ goals (Over 3.5) about 31%. Additionally, the home team has scored 54 and conceded 13 goals this season, the visitors 38 and 24, and average shots on target are 4.36 (home) vs 3.60 (away), which confirms both teams’ ability to create chances and increases the likelihood of goal exchanges. As a result the strongest and most valuable signal from the data is Over 1.5 (recommendation: over at the 1.5 line), while Over 2.5 offers only a moderate edge (~53%), and Over 3.5 remains risky (~31%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — the home team were level at the break in 60% of matches and average 0.6 goals by half-time versus 0.5 for the visitors. After the break the statistics strongly favor Falubaz: the home side score an average of 1.6 goals in the second half while conceding only 0.2, whereas the visitors record 0.75 scored and 0.75 conceded after half-time, giving the hosts an approximate 0.85-goal advantage in the second half (1.6–0.75). Additionally, the home team have a higher season goals return of 1.77 versus 1.5 for the visitors and higher xG (1.54 for the hosts versus the visitors’ defense allowing on average 1.13 xG), which supports their ability to create chances. Considering that few goals are scored before the break (a combined average of 1.1) and the hosts’ dominance after half-time, I assign the highest probability to X/1 (27%), followed by X/X (21%) and 1/1 (14%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

41Possession (%)59
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
14Shots10
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
8Shots on target4
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
1.85xG1.48
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
3Corners2
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
58Dangerous attacks79
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
-1Fouls-1
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
4Cards1
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
2.35Goals scored / game1.65
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.57Goals allowed / game1.04
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
32%Average possession36%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
3.61Shots on target / game2.57
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.83Shots per game6.91
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
3.61Shots on target2.57
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
26.6%Shot conversion23.9%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
32%Possession36%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
1.74xG for1.52
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
1.16xG against1.35
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Shooting quality

Falubaz Zielona Góra: Counter-attackingGoczałkowice Zdrój: Counter-attacking
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Accuracy (shots on target)41%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.650.64

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Goczałkowice Zdrój is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Falubaz Zielona Góra · 2.4 pts / game - Goczałkowice Zdrój

Falubaz Zielona Góra
WWDLD
Season result split
57% W35% D9% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-2
2.04 pts / game · goal difference +41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Goczałkowice Zdrój
LWWWW
Season result split
52% W30% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-4
1.87 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Falubaz Zielona Góra is 42% better for: goals scored per game.

2.35 goals / game - Falubaz Zielona Góra · 1.65 goals / game - Goczałkowice Zdrój

Falubaz Zielona Góra is 82% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.57 goals / game - Falubaz Zielona Góra · 1.04 goals / game - Goczałkowice Zdrój

Falubaz Zielona Góra scoring profile: very strong

Falubaz Zielona Góra scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while Goczałkowice Zdrój keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).

Goczałkowice Zdrój scoring profile: strong

Goczałkowice Zdrój scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Falubaz Zielona Góra keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 meczów).

54Goals scored (season)38
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
13Goals conceded (season)24
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
2.91Average goals per game2.7
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal78%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
52%2 goals48%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
43%3 goals26%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
26%4 goals9%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal65%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
9%2 goals26%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0%3 goals4%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0%4 goals4%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
Falubaz Zielona Góra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 23 meczów
52%
Goczałkowice Zdrój - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 23 meczów
61%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time17%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
22%Scored in both halves17%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
40%BTTS - last 520%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time26%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

2nd half

39%Min. 1 goal after half-time26%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Falubaz Zielona Góra is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / game - Falubaz Zielona Góra · 1.04 pts / game - Goczałkowice Zdrój

Falubaz Zielona Góra - half-time state
26% leading65% draw9% trailing
Goczałkowice Zdrój - half-time state
4% leading91% draw4% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per game (1st half)1.04
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.22
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.43
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
87%Clean sheet before half-time78%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
70%No goal before half-time78%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per game (2nd half)1.3
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
0.7Average goals (2nd half)0.65
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
83%Clean sheet after half-time87%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój
70%No goal after half-time78%
Falubaz Zielona GóraGoczałkowice Zdrój

Falubaz Zielona Góra - second-half results

26% W65% D9% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding219%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Goczałkowice Zdrój - second-half results

17% W78% D4% L
24
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding1300%

Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Falubaz Zielona Góra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Goczałkowice Zdrój - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.20.4
1 goal20%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Falubaz Zielona Góra
ScoredConceded
33
7
0-15
3
1
16-30
6
1
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (33 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Goczałkowice Zdrój
ScoredConceded
23
16
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (23 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Falubaz Zielona Góra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 61% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Goczałkowice Zdrój

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 61% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 3).

Teams vs league

Falubaz Zielona GóraLigaGoczałkowice Zdrój
Average goals per game 2.913.27 2.70
Both teams scored 48%61% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%66% 57%
Clean sheets 52%21% 35%
Goal before half-time 39%32% 26%
Goal after half-time 39%33% 26%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.27
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
32%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
33%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Falubaz Zielona Góra's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Goczałkowice Zdrój. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Goczałkowice Zdrój
0 : 1
Falubaz Zielona Góra

FAQ

What was the result of Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój?

The 3 Liga Group 3 match finished Falubaz Zielona Góra 5:0 Goczałkowice Zdrój. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój?

Falubaz Zielona Góra score 2.35 goals per game on average and Goczałkowice Zdrój 1.65. The 3 Liga Group 3 average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Falubaz Zielona Góra's matches and 52% of Goczałkowice Zdrój's.

What form are Falubaz Zielona Góra and Goczałkowice Zdrój in?

Over the last 5 games Falubaz Zielona Góra have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Goczałkowice Zdrój 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Falubaz Zielona Góra vs Goczałkowice Zdrój: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.