FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAR Rabat play UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 28 June 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
FAR Rabat: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAR Rabat scores 1.50 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAR Rabat 50%, UTS Rabat 63%. Over 2.5: FAR Rabat 47%, UTS Rabat 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.30. FAR Rabat: 11.7 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.5.
Match halves
FAR Rabat: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.90. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
FAR Rabat: 46-60 (10 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
FAR Rabat is a clear favorite at home: they have a 69% home win rate, 0% home losses and average 1.69 goals scored and only 0.54 conceded per home match. UTS Rabat sit 15th and have won just 23% of away games, scoring 1.00 and conceding 1.31 on average away, indicating a weaker defense on the road. Quality-of-chance metrics confirm the hosts’ advantage: FAR’s average home xG is 1.54 versus UTS’s away xG of 1.36, while xG against is 0.98 for FAR and 1.42 for UTS. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches and have a lower FTS of 15% with a higher conversion rate of 14%, whereas the visitors have only 8% clean sheets, FTS 31% and a 10% conversion. Considering recent form over the last 5 matches (FAR: 2 wins, 3 draws, 7 goals; UTS: 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, 5 goals) and the advantage in possession 56% vs 45% and shots 12.15 vs 9.77, I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAR Rabat | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
UTS Rabat is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat
FAR Rabat is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat
FAR Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — FAR Rabat
Over / Under — UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAR Rabat is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAR Rabat
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FAR Rabat | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.23 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 30% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FAR Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished FAR Rabat 2:2 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat?
FAR Rabat score 1.50 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.07. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FAR Rabat's matches and 63% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are FAR Rabat and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games FAR Rabat have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat?
The statistical background for FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.