Portugal - LigaProData current as of September 12, 2026

Farense vs Sporting CP II: match statistics

Farense crest
Farense
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Sporting CP II crest
Sporting CP II

Farense vs Sporting CP II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Farense played against Sporting CP II in LigaPro (Portugal). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Farense has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Sporting CP II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Farense scores 0.82 goals per game and allows 1.21. Sporting CP II scores 1.43 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 36% of Farense's games and 39% of Sporting CP II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 50%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Farense has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.40 per game. Farense takes 12.8 shots per game, while Sporting CP II takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Farense leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Sporting CP II leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

Farense's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Sporting CP II, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

LigaPro games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sporting CP II are favorites based on 6th position in the table versus Farense’s 17th and a +5 away goal differential compared to the hosts’ -8 at home. Farense have serious finishing issues: on average 0.79 goals per home game, a conversion rate of 6% and as many as 64% of home matches without a goal, despite generating 13.71 shots and 4.93 on target per game. Sporting away average is 1.21 goals, a higher conversion of 10% and they concede only 0.86 goals on the road; their away xG is 1.36 versus the hosts’ xG of 1.65 (hosts have higher xG but it does not translate into goals). In the last 5 matches Farense have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1.0 point per game, while Sporting have 1 win and 4 losses, averaging 0.6 points per game, giving a minimal form edge to the hosts. Considering the visitors’ superior defense (0.86 conceded away), the hosts’ low efficiency and the differences in conversion rate, I tip an away win, though I expect a low score and a realistic possibility of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project the more likely outcome is 'BTTS = No' (62% vs 38%). This season Farense averages 1.64 goals scored and 1.14 conceded per match, Sporting CP II averages 1.21 scored and 0.86 conceded, with BTTS rates of 43% and 36% respectively (league average 47%) — below half of fixtures. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred only in 40% for both teams, with averages of 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 (Farense)/1.2 (Sporting II) goals conceded, indicating suppressed offensive form. Despite similar xG_for (1.44 vs 1.36) and Farense’s edge in shots on target (5.0 vs 3.79), both sides have xG_against around 1.45, and the league records as many as 63% clean sheets, which strengthens the No Goal signal. Considering sub-50% BTTS rates (43%/36%), 40% in L5 and the high clean sheet frequency (63%), the 'No' selection is the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Data indicate a moderately high goal potential: Farense has xG 1.44 and a seasonal goals average of 1.64, Sporting II has xG 1.36 and a seasonal average of 1.21 — combined xG is 2.80, combined seasonal averages 2.85. Farense averages 5.0 shots on target with a 14% conversion, Sporting II records 3.79 shots on target with a 10% conversion, so I project 1.52 goals for the home side and 1.30 for the visitors, total 2.82. Seasonal over shares show over 1.5 occurred in 64% of Farense’s matches and 57% of Sporting II’s, while over 2.5 in 57%/43%; conversely, over 3.5 is only 29%/14% — hence over 2.5 has moderate backing (≈58%), and over 3.5 is unlikely (≈22%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams averaged 0.6 goals each (1.2 combined), which reduces confidence in higher overs and increases relevance of under 3.5. Therefore I recommend the strongest signal as under 3.5 (78% probability), while over 1.5 remains a reasonable but less certain option (68%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Farense is the clear favorite to lead at the break — they led at half-time in 7 of 14 home matches (50%), scoring an average of 0.86 goals by the break and conceding 0.50, while Sporting CP II led in only 3 of 14 (21%) and average 0.57 goals by half-time. The hosts also have better shots on target figures (5.0 vs 3.79) and higher shot efficiency (14% vs 10%), and total xG is 1.44 versus 1.36 in favor of Farense, all of which supports the hosts leading after 45 minutes. However, Sporting shows the advantage after the break — they average 1.64 points in second halves versus Farense’s 1.29 and win 43% of second halves compared to the hosts’ 28%, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround. Additionally, Sporting scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90 while Farense conceded 8 in that same interval, which creates a logical scenario of Farense leading at half-time and being pegged back after the change of ends. Therefore my strongest signal is 1/X with an estimated probability of 23%, with 1/1 (18%) and 2/2 (11%) as the main alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

32Possession (%)68
FarenseSporting CP II
6Shots7
FarenseSporting CP II
4Shots on target1
FarenseSporting CP II
0.9xG0.89
FarenseSporting CP II
3Corners7
FarenseSporting CP II
32Dangerous attacks52
FarenseSporting CP II
6Fouls5
FarenseSporting CP II
1Cards2
FarenseSporting CP II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FarenseSporting CP II
0.82Goals scored / game1.43
FarenseSporting CP II
1.21Goals allowed / game1
FarenseSporting CP II
50%Average possession53%
FarenseSporting CP II
4.54Shots on target / game4.39
FarenseSporting CP II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.75Shots per game11.57
FarenseSporting CP II
4.54Shots on target4.39
FarenseSporting CP II
6.4%Shot conversion12.3%
FarenseSporting CP II
50%Possession53%
FarenseSporting CP II
1.52xG for1.4
FarenseSporting CP II
1.37xG against1.45
FarenseSporting CP II

Shooting quality

Farense: BalancedSporting CP II: Balanced
FarenseSporting CP II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Farense is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Farense · 0.6 pts / game - Sporting CP II

Farense
WDDLL
Season result split
25% W29% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-13
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Sporting CP II
LLLWL
Season result split
46% W7% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-13
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sporting CP II is 74% better for: goals scored per game.

0.82 goals / game - Farense · 1.43 goals / game - Sporting CP II

Sporting CP II is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.21 goals / game - Farense · 1 goals / game - Sporting CP II

Farense scoring profile: mixed

Farense scores in 50% of games (14 of 28 meczów), while Sporting CP II keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).

Sporting CP II scoring profile: strong

Sporting CP II scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while Farense keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)40
FarenseSporting CP II
34Goals conceded (season)28
FarenseSporting CP II
2.04Average goals per game2.43
FarenseSporting CP II
3Goals scored (last 5)3
FarenseSporting CP II
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
FarenseSporting CP II

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal68%
FarenseSporting CP II
25%2 goals39%
FarenseSporting CP II
4%3 goals25%
FarenseSporting CP II
4%4 goals11%
FarenseSporting CP II

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal68%
FarenseSporting CP II
36%2 goals25%
FarenseSporting CP II
18%3 goals7%
FarenseSporting CP II
0%4 goals0%
FarenseSporting CP II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time18%
FarenseSporting CP II
4%BTTS in both halves7%
FarenseSporting CP II
11%Scored in both halves29%
FarenseSporting CP II

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
FarenseSporting CP II
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FarenseSporting CP II
40%BTTS - last 540%
FarenseSporting CP II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
FarenseSporting CP II
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
FarenseSporting CP II
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FarenseSporting CP II

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
FarenseSporting CP II
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
FarenseSporting CP II
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
FarenseSporting CP II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sporting CP II is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / game - Farense · 1.36 pts / game - Sporting CP II

Farense - half-time state
14% leading54% draw32% trailing
Sporting CP II - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per game (1st half)1.36
FarenseSporting CP II
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.71
FarenseSporting CP II
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
FarenseSporting CP II
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.25
FarenseSporting CP II
61%Clean sheet before half-time54%
FarenseSporting CP II
79%No goal before half-time50%
FarenseSporting CP II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.46
FarenseSporting CP II
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
FarenseSporting CP II
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
FarenseSporting CP II
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.18
FarenseSporting CP II
43%Clean sheet after half-time61%
FarenseSporting CP II
61%No goal after half-time54%
FarenseSporting CP II

Farense - second-half results

18% W46% D36% L
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sporting CP II - second-half results

36% W39% D25% L
38
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Farense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.21.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sporting CP II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Farense
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
1
8
16-30
2
4
31-45
0
6
46-60
6
8
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Sporting CP II
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
10
6
31-45
9
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+79%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Farense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Sporting CP II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).

Teams vs league

FarenseLigaSporting CP II
Average goals per game 2.042.43 2.43
Both teams scored 36%47% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%44% 50%
Clean sheets 32%32% 32%
Goal before half-time 50%64% 79%
Goal after half-time 75%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / game
1.18
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

António Emanuel Carvalho NobreMatches officiated: 9
6.89Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins33%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Farense's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sporting CP II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Farense vs Sporting CP II?

The LigaPro match finished Farense 2:1 Sporting CP II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Farense vs Sporting CP II?

Farense score 0.82 goals per game on average and Sporting CP II 1.43. The LigaPro average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Farense's matches and 39% of Sporting CP II's.

What form are Farense and Sporting CP II in?

Over the last 5 games Farense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sporting CP II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Farense vs Sporting CP II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.