FAS vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FAS played against Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
FAS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Cacahuatique has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
FAS scores 2.21 goals per game and allows 1.17. Cacahuatique scores 1.36 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of FAS's games and 59% of Cacahuatique's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 68%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.46 per game. FAS takes 11.0 shots per game, while Cacahuatique takes 9.1.
First-half and second-half trends
FAS leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.21 goals per game after halftime. Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
FAS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Cacahuatique, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FAS | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FAS is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - FAS · 0.6 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 62% better for: goals scored per game.
2.21 goals / game - FAS · 1.36 goals / game - Cacahuatique
FAS is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - FAS · 1.45 goals / game - Cacahuatique
FAS scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 games).
Cacahuatique scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAS
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 32%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FAS
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| FAS | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.38 | 2.74 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from FAS's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cacahuatique. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FAS vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 0:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Cacahuatique?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Cacahuatique won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Cacahuatique?
FAS score 2.21 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.36. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of FAS's matches and 59% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are FAS and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Cacahuatique?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.