El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

FAS vs Firpo: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Firpo crest
Firpo
135%(2.44)
X30%(2.97)
235%(2.80)

The match promises to be an exceptionally tight encounter between two of the league's top teams. FAS shows impressive home form with a 76% win rate at their ground and an average of 2.24 goals per match. However, Firpo boasts an even better overall record (24 wins this season) and higher scoring efficiency on the road (averaging 2.6 goals). A key factor is FAS's advantage in possession (56% vs. 50%) and their superior home defense (conceding 0.88 goals on average), which balances the visitors' attacking strength. Both teams are in excellent form – FAS with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, Firpo also with 4 victories. Considering the statistical balance, the high efficiency of both sides, and the fact that Firpo rarely keeps a clean sheet away from home (7% CS%), I anticipate an exciting, open match with a draw as the most likely scenario.

FAS vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS play Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 1 March 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Firpo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Firpo scores 1.88 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 52%, Firpo 57%. Over 2.5: FAS 52%, Firpo 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.53. FAS: 11.0 shots per match, Firpo: 11.2.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12. Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.24.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (26 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The match promises to be an exceptionally tight encounter between two of the league's top teams. FAS shows impressive home form with a 76% win rate at their ground and an average of 2.24 goals per match. However, Firpo boasts an even better overall record (24 wins this season) and higher scoring efficiency on the road (averaging 2.6 goals). A key factor is FAS's advantage in possession (56% vs. 50%) and their superior home defense (conceding 0.88 goals on average), which balances the visitors' attacking strength. Both teams are in excellent form – FAS with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, Firpo also with 4 victories. Considering the statistical balance, the high efficiency of both sides, and the fact that Firpo rarely keeps a clean sheet away from home (7% CS%), I anticipate an exciting, open match with a draw as the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FASFirpo
8Shots11
FASFirpo
2Shots on target2
FASFirpo
1.16xG1.23
FASFirpo
4Corners1
FASFirpo
70Dangerous attacks54
FASFirpo
-1Fouls-1
FASFirpo
-1Cards-1
FASFirpo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.1Goals scored / match1.88
FASFirpo
0.92Goals conceded / match1.04
FASFirpo
53%Average possession52%
FASFirpo
5Shots on target / match4.96
FASFirpo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match11.24
FASFirpo
5Shots on target4.96
FASFirpo
19.1%Shot conversion16.8%
FASFirpo
53%Possession52%
FASFirpo
1.53xG for1.73
FASFirpo
1.2xG against1.19
FASFirpo

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingFirpo: Efficient finishing
FASFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)45%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FAS · 1.2 pts / match - Firpo

FAS
DDLWW
Season result split
62% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
32-13-7
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +61
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
20-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Firpo
DDDWL
Season result split
61% W24% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
31-12-8
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +43
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
16-5-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

2.1 goals / match - FAS · 1.88 goals / match - Firpo

FAS is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - FAS · 1.04 goals / match - Firpo

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (16 of 51 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: strong

Firpo scores in 82% of matches (42 of 51 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).

109Goals scored (season)96
FASFirpo
48Goals conceded (season)53
FASFirpo
3.02Average goals in match2.92
FASFirpo
7Goals scored (last 5)5
FASFirpo
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
FASFirpo

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
FASFirpo
62%2 goals57%
FASFirpo
37%3 goals39%
FASFirpo
12%4 goals6%
FASFirpo

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal69%
FASFirpo
23%2 goals25%
FASFirpo
8%3 goals6%
FASFirpo
0%4 goals2%
FASFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time18%
FASFirpo
6%BTTS in both halves6%
FASFirpo
46%Scored in both halves39%
FASFirpo

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
FASFirpo
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FASFirpo
40%BTTS - last 580%
FASFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FASFirpo
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
FASFirpo
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
FASFirpo

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FASFirpo
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
FASFirpo
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
FASFirpo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - FAS · 1.47 pts / match - Firpo

FAS - half-time state
44% leading40% draw15% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.47
FASFirpo
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.65
FASFirpo
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.49
FASFirpo
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.14
FASFirpo
67%Clean sheet before half-time65%
FASFirpo
38%No goal before half-time51%
FASFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)2.12
FASFirpo
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)1.24
FASFirpo
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
FASFirpo
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.78
FASFirpo
60%Clean sheet after half-time55%
FASFirpo
29%No goal after half-time27%
FASFirpo

FAS - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
90
Half-time points
50
Half-time goals
+29
Goal difference (1st half)
95
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - second-half results

63% W24% R14% P
75
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
108
Second-half points
+35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
18
4
0-15
17
5
16-30
16
13
31-45
11
10
46-60
17
6
61-75
30
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
12
8
0-15
9
9
16-30
12
8
31-45
13
12
46-60
26
9
61-75
24
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaFirpo
Average goals in match 3.022.67 2.92
Both teams scored 52%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%50% 53%
Clean sheets 38%27% 31%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): FAS 0 - 1 - 2 Firpo. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Firpo
1 : 1
FAS
Firpo
3 : 1
FAS
FAS
2 : 3
Firpo

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 2:0 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Firpo?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 0, Firpo won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Firpo?

FAS score 2.10 goals per game on average and Firpo 1.88. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FAS's matches and 57% of Firpo's.

What form are FAS and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Firpo 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Firpo?

The statistical background for FAS vs Firpo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.