El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of October 18, 2026

FAS vs Fuerte San Francisco: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Fuerte San Francisco crest
Fuerte San Francisco
175%(0.00)
X18%(0.00)
27%(0.00)

FAS is displaying impressive form with a five-match winning streak and a season record of 24-9-5, having scored as many as 82 goals. The hosts dominate at home with a 79% win rate in home matches, averaging 2.32 goals per game and conceding only 0.79 goals. Fuerte San Francisco has very poor away form (22% wins, 44% losses) and a goal difference of -10 in away games, conceding an average of 1.5 goals while scoring only 0.94 per game. The visitors' last five matches have yielded just 1 point per game, while FAS has been averaging a perfect 3 points per game. The massive statistical advantage of FAS in every aspect, particularly in attacking efficiency and current form, indicates a decisive home victory.

FAS vs Fuerte San Francisco: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FAS played against Fuerte San Francisco in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

FAS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Fuerte San Francisco has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FAS scores 2.16 goals per game and allows 0.97. Fuerte San Francisco scores 0.91 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of FAS's games and 51% of Fuerte San Francisco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 51%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.31 per game. FAS takes 11.1 shots per game, while Fuerte San Francisco takes 9.6.

First-half and second-half trends

FAS leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 1.18 goals per game after halftime. Fuerte San Francisco leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

FAS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (25 goals). For Fuerte San Francisco, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS is displaying impressive form with a five-match winning streak and a season record of 24-9-5, having scored as many as 82 goals. The hosts dominate at home with a 79% win rate in home matches, averaging 2.32 goals per game and conceding only 0.79 goals. Fuerte San Francisco has very poor away form (22% wins, 44% losses) and a goal difference of -10 in away games, conceding an average of 1.5 goals while scoring only 0.94 per game. The visitors' last five matches have yielded just 1 point per game, while FAS has been averaging a perfect 3 points per game. The massive statistical advantage of FAS in every aspect, particularly in attacking efficiency and current form, indicates a decisive home victory.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
FASFuerte San Francisco
13Shots12
FASFuerte San Francisco
4Shots on target4
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.57xG1.28
FASFuerte San Francisco
7Corners4
FASFuerte San Francisco
62Dangerous attacks32
FASFuerte San Francisco
-1Fouls-1
FASFuerte San Francisco
-1Cards-1
FASFuerte San Francisco

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FASFuerte San Francisco
2.16Goals scored / game0.91
FASFuerte San Francisco
0.97Goals allowed / game1.71
FASFuerte San Francisco
53%Average possession45%
FASFuerte San Francisco
5.21Shots on target / game3.49
FASFuerte San Francisco

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.11Shots per game9.57
FASFuerte San Francisco
5.21Shots on target3.49
FASFuerte San Francisco
19.4%Shot conversion9.6%
FASFuerte San Francisco
53%Possession45%
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.55xG for1.31
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.2xG against1.54
FASFuerte San Francisco

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingFuerte San Francisco: Balanced
FASFuerte San Francisco
Accuracy (shots on target)47%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FAS is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - FAS · 1 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco

FAS
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
63% W24% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
24-9-5
2.13 pts / game · goal difference +45
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
15-2-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Fuerte San Francisco
DLLWD
Season result split
14% W40% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-14-16
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 137% better for: goals scored per game.

2.16 goals / game - FAS · 0.91 goals / game - Fuerte San Francisco

FAS is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.97 goals / game - FAS · 1.71 goals / game - Fuerte San Francisco

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 89% of games (34 of 38 games), while Fuerte San Francisco keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 games).

Fuerte San Francisco scoring profile: mixed

Fuerte San Francisco scores in 60% of games (21 of 35 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 games).

82Goals scored (season)32
FASFuerte San Francisco
37Goals conceded (season)60
FASFuerte San Francisco
3.13Average goals per game2.63
FASFuerte San Francisco
13Goals scored (last 5)7
FASFuerte San Francisco
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
FASFuerte San Francisco

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal60%
FASFuerte San Francisco
63%2 goals26%
FASFuerte San Francisco
39%3 goals6%
FASFuerte San Francisco
13%4 goals0%
FASFuerte San Francisco

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal71%
FASFuerte San Francisco
26%2 goals46%
FASFuerte San Francisco
8%3 goals31%
FASFuerte San Francisco
0%4 goals9%
FASFuerte San Francisco

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
Fuerte San Francisco - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 35 games
55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time20%
FASFuerte San Francisco
8%BTTS in both halves6%
FASFuerte San Francisco
45%Scored in both halves17%
FASFuerte San Francisco

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
FASFuerte San Francisco
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FASFuerte San Francisco
20%BTTS - last 580%
FASFuerte San Francisco

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FASFuerte San Francisco
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
FASFuerte San Francisco
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
FASFuerte San Francisco

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
FASFuerte San Francisco
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
FASFuerte San Francisco
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
FASFuerte San Francisco

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / game - FAS · 0.74 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco

FAS - half-time state
42% leading42% draw16% trailing
Fuerte San Francisco - half-time state
9% leading49% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per game (1st half)0.74
FASFuerte San Francisco
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.29
FASFuerte San Francisco
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.2
FASFuerte San Francisco
68%Clean sheet before half-time43%
FASFuerte San Francisco
42%No goal before half-time71%
FASFuerte San Francisco

After half-time (2nd half)

1.79Points per game (2nd half)1.29
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
FASFuerte San Francisco
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
FASFuerte San Francisco
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.43
FASFuerte San Francisco
55%Clean sheet after half-time54%
FASFuerte San Francisco
26%No goal after half-time51%
FASFuerte San Francisco

FAS - second-half results

47% W37% D16% L
64
Half-time points
36
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Fuerte San Francisco - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-22
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.74
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FAS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.20
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+6+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Fuerte San Francisco - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.62.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FAS
ScoredConceded
11
3
0-15
14
3
16-30
12
9
31-45
7
8
46-60
13
4
61-75
25
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (25 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

Fuerte San Francisco
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
3
10
16-30
6
14
31-45
8
10
46-60
4
9
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Fuerte San Francisco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaFuerte San Francisco
Average goals per game▲ 3.132.73▼ 2.63
Both teams scored• 55%55%▼ 51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%53%▼ 51%
Clean sheets▲ 37%27%▲ 29%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%68%▼ 66%
Goal after half-time▲ 84%77%▼ 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1
—Jonathan Antonio Nolasco Martínez⚽ 1
—Rudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Joshua Gallardo⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Fuerte San FranciscoGoalJoshua Gallardo
  2. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  3. FASGoalRudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza
  4. FASGoalJonathan Antonio Nolasco Martínez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filiberto MartinezMatches officiated: 12
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins33%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from FAS's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Fuerte San Francisco. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Fuerte San Francisco
1 : 1
FAS
FAS
3 : 0
Fuerte San Francisco
Fuerte San Francisco
0 : 8
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Fuerte San Francisco?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 3:1 Fuerte San Francisco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Fuerte San Francisco?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Fuerte San Francisco won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Fuerte San Francisco?

FAS score 2.16 goals per game on average and Fuerte San Francisco 0.91. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 51% of Fuerte San Francisco's.

What form are FAS and Fuerte San Francisco in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Fuerte San Francisco 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Fuerte San Francisco?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.