El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Isidro Metapán crest
Isidro Metapán
165%(2.00)
X20%(3.00)
215%(3.50)

FAS displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 75% of their home matches and scoring an average of 2.17 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive home goal difference of +15 and a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 16%). Isidro Metapán performs poorly on the road with only 42% wins and 25% of matches failing to score, while their recent form (0.8 PPG) is considerably worse than that of the hosts (1.8 PPG). The difference in average xG (1.52 vs 1.15) and ball possession (57% vs 47%) further favors FAS. Considering all parameters, especially the home side's dominance at their own stadium and the visitors' poor form, an FAS victory is the most probable scenario.

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS play Isidro Metapán in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 18 January 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Isidro Metapán: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Isidro Metapán scores 1.19 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 52%, Isidro Metapán 57%. Over 2.5: FAS 52%, Isidro Metapán 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.31. FAS: 11.0 shots per match, Isidro Metapán: 9.2.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12. Isidro Metapán: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). Isidro Metapán: 31-45+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 3-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

FAS displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 75% of their home matches and scoring an average of 2.17 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive home goal difference of +15 and a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 16%). Isidro Metapán performs poorly on the road with only 42% wins and 25% of matches failing to score, while their recent form (0.8 PPG) is considerably worse than that of the hosts (1.8 PPG). The difference in average xG (1.52 vs 1.15) and ball possession (57% vs 47%) further favors FAS. Considering all parameters, especially the home side's dominance at their own stadium and the visitors' poor form, an FAS victory is the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
FASIsidro Metapán
9Shots9
FASIsidro Metapán
5Shots on target6
FASIsidro Metapán
1.35xG1.28
FASIsidro Metapán
4Corners6
FASIsidro Metapán
59Dangerous attacks40
FASIsidro Metapán
18Fouls16
FASIsidro Metapán
0Cards0
FASIsidro Metapán

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.1Goals scored / match1.19
FASIsidro Metapán
0.92Goals conceded / match1.3
FASIsidro Metapán
53%Average possession51%
FASIsidro Metapán
5Shots on target / match4.21
FASIsidro Metapán

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match9.17
FASIsidro Metapán
5Shots on target4.21
FASIsidro Metapán
19.1%Shot conversion13%
FASIsidro Metapán
53%Possession51%
FASIsidro Metapán
1.53xG for1.31
FASIsidro Metapán
1.2xG against1.29
FASIsidro Metapán

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingIsidro Metapán: Efficient finishing
FASIsidro Metapán
Accuracy (shots on target)45%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FAS · 0.8 pts / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS
DDLWW
Season result split
62% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
32-13-7
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +61
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
20-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Isidro Metapán
WLLLD
Season result split
34% W34% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-16-15
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-9-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

2.1 goals / match - FAS · 1.19 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - FAS · 1.3 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 26% (12 of 47 matches).

Isidro Metapán scoring profile: strong

Isidro Metapán scores in 72% of matches (34 of 47 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).

109Goals scored (season)56
FASIsidro Metapán
48Goals conceded (season)61
FASIsidro Metapán
3.02Average goals in match2.49
FASIsidro Metapán
7Goals scored (last 5)4
FASIsidro Metapán
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal72%
FASIsidro Metapán
62%2 goals38%
FASIsidro Metapán
37%3 goals6%
FASIsidro Metapán
12%4 goals2%
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal74%
FASIsidro Metapán
23%2 goals43%
FASIsidro Metapán
8%3 goals13%
FASIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals0%
FASIsidro Metapán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time13%
FASIsidro Metapán
6%BTTS in both halves4%
FASIsidro Metapán
46%Scored in both halves19%
FASIsidro Metapán

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
FASIsidro Metapán
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FASIsidro Metapán
40%BTTS - last 540%
FASIsidro Metapán

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
FASIsidro Metapán
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
FASIsidro Metapán
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
FASIsidro Metapán

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
FASIsidro Metapán
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
FASIsidro Metapán
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
FASIsidro Metapán

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - FAS · 1.36 pts / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS - half-time state
44% leading40% draw15% trailing
Isidro Metapán - half-time state
32% leading40% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.36
FASIsidro Metapán
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.55
FASIsidro Metapán
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.51
FASIsidro Metapán
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.06
FASIsidro Metapán
67%Clean sheet before half-time60%
FASIsidro Metapán
38%No goal before half-time60%
FASIsidro Metapán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.17
FASIsidro Metapán
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
FASIsidro Metapán
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
FASIsidro Metapán
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.43
FASIsidro Metapán
60%Clean sheet after half-time45%
FASIsidro Metapán
29%No goal after half-time49%
FASIsidro Metapán

FAS - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
90
Half-time points
50
Half-time goals
+29
Goal difference (1st half)
95
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Isidro Metapán - second-half results

26% W40% R34% P
64
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Isidro Metapán - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
18
4
0-15
17
5
16-30
16
13
31-45
11
10
46-60
17
6
61-75
30
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.

Isidro Metapán
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
7
5
16-30
15
10
31-45
12
10
46-60
4
9
61-75
14
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Isidro Metapán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaIsidro Metapán
Average goals in match 3.022.67 2.49
Both teams scored 52%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%50% 53%
Clean sheets 38%27% 26%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 68%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): FAS 3 - 0 - 0 Isidro Metapán. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Isidro Metapán
0 : 3
FAS
Isidro Metapán
2 : 3
FAS
FAS
1 : 0
Isidro Metapán

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 2:2 Isidro Metapán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Isidro Metapán?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 3, Isidro Metapán won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

FAS score 2.10 goals per game on average and Isidro Metapán 1.19. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FAS's matches and 57% of Isidro Metapán's.

What form are FAS and Isidro Metapán in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Isidro Metapán 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.