Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mekelakeya crest
Mekelakeya
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Mekelakeya presents a significantly better offensive form, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per away match with a 20% conversion rate, whereas Fasil Ketema scores an average of only 0.73 goals in home matches. The visitors boast a much higher average ball possession (60% vs 44%) and record more shots on target (3.45 vs 3), which proves their offensive dominance. Fasil Ketema is going through a crisis of form, losing four of their last five matches and earning merely 0.2 points per game, which drastically weakens their chances. Mekelakeya has a positive away goal difference (+6) and a 45% win rate, making them the favorite in this clash. Additionally, the visitors score in 91% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' poor form, gives them a clear advantage to claim the victory.

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fasil Ketema played against Mekelakeya in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on March 13, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Fasil Ketema has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Mekelakeya has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 goals per game and allows 0.65. Mekelakeya scores 1.25 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 1.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 30% of Fasil Ketema's games and 42% of Mekelakeya's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 29%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mekelakeya has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.15 per game. Fasil Ketema takes 7.3 shots per game, while Mekelakeya takes 8.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Fasil Ketema leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Mekelakeya leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.38 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fasil Ketema's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Mekelakeya, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.76 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mekelakeya presents a significantly better offensive form, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per away match with a 20% conversion rate, whereas Fasil Ketema scores an average of only 0.73 goals in home matches. The visitors boast a much higher average ball possession (60% vs 44%) and record more shots on target (3.45 vs 3), which proves their offensive dominance. Fasil Ketema is going through a crisis of form, losing four of their last five matches and earning merely 0.2 points per game, which drastically weakens their chances. Mekelakeya has a positive away goal difference (+6) and a 45% win rate, making them the favorite in this clash. Additionally, the visitors score in 91% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' poor form, gives them a clear advantage to claim the victory.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4Shots7
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1Shots on target1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.79xG1.03
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0Corners2
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
64Dangerous attacks70
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
-1Fouls-1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
-1Cards-1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.74Goals scored / game1.25
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.65Goals allowed / game0.88
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
45%Average possession55%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
2.65Shots on target / game3.04
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.35Shots per game8.38
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
2.65Shots on target3.04
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
10.1%Shot conversion14.9%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
45%Possession55%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.15xG for1.27
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.08xG against0.97
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedMekelakeya: Efficient finishing
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mekelakeya is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Fasil Ketema · 1.2 pts / game - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
35% W43% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-5
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 0.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mekelakeya
DLDWD
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-6
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 69% better for: goals scored per game.

0.74 goals / game - Fasil Ketema · 1.25 goals / game - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema is 35% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.65 goals / game - Fasil Ketema · 0.88 goals / game - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).

Mekelakeya scoring profile: mixed

Mekelakeya scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 57% (13 of 23 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)30
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
15Goals conceded (season)21
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.39Average goals per game2.13
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal71%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
9%2 goals42%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%3 goals13%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

How often they concede at least...

43%1 goal54%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
17%2 goals25%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%3 goals4%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%4 goals4%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time17%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%Scored in both halves17%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
60%BTTS - last 540%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time54%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelakeya is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / game - Fasil Ketema · 1.71 pts / game - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
22% leading74% draw4% trailing
Mekelakeya - half-time state
42% leading46% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per game (1st half)1.71
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.79
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.43Average goals (1st half)1.13
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
87%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
74%No goal before half-time50%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.96Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
61%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
61%No goal after half-time67%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

22% W52% R26% P
32
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mekelakeya - second-half results

17% W54% R29% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 38%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.20
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game0.41.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mekelakeya - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
10
4
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.76
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaMekelakeya
Average goals per game 1.391.76 2.13
Both teams scored 30%41% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%27% 29%
Clean sheets 57%40% 46%
Goal before half-time 30%54% 63%
Goal after half-time 61%58% 54%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.76
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / game
0.87
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Fasil Ketema's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mekelakeya. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Mekelakeya
0 : 0
Fasil Ketema

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:0 Mekelakeya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Mekelakeya 1.25. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 42% of Mekelakeya's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Mekelakeya in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Mekelakeya 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.