Spain - Segunda DivisiónData current as of September 11, 2026

FC Andorra vs Ceuta: match statistics

FC Andorra crest
FC Andorra
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Ceuta crest
Ceuta

FC Andorra vs Ceuta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Andorra played against Ceuta in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

FC Andorra has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Ceuta has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Andorra scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.27. Ceuta scores 1.20 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of FC Andorra's games and 57% of Ceuta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 57%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Andorra has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.25 per game. FC Andorra takes 14.4 shots per game, while Ceuta takes 10.7.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Andorra leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Ceuta leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Andorra's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (20 goals). For Ceuta, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Segunda División games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Andorra holds a clear advantage in attack and game control: at home they average 1.55 goals per match with an average xG of 1.79, while Ceuta away averages 1.05 goals per match and xG 1.09. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Andorra concedes 1.15 goals per home match on average, whereas Ceuta concedes 2.0 goals on the road; in the last 5 matches Andorra conceded 4 goals and Ceuta 8. Andorra’s superiority is supported by shot volume and possession: the hosts average 16 shots and 5.15 shots on target with 64% possession, versus 9.5 shots, 3.05 shots on target and 49% possession for Ceuta. The visitors also fail offensively more often — in 35% of away matches they fail to score compared to 20% for Andorra; over the last 5 matches Andorra scored 11 goals and Ceuta 6, translating to an average of 1.8 points per match for the hosts versus 1.2 points per match for the visitors. Considering the xG advantage (1.79 vs 1.09), higher shot volume (16 vs 9.5), stronger home record (home win rate 40% vs away win rate 20%) and the goal difference disparity (+8 at home for Andorra vs -19 for Ceuta away), the hosts are the favorites for this fixture.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS rates of 60% (FC Andorra) and 55% (Ceuta), with a league average of 56%, which already favors the “yes” option. In the last 5 matches the picture is mixed: Andorra had BTTS in 40% of games, while Ceuta did so in 80%, producing a short-term average of 60% and indicating that at least Ceuta regularly features matches with goals at both ends. Looking at goals and xG, Andorra scores 1.35 goals on the season and 2.2 in the last 5 (11 goals), with xG 1.41 for the season and 1.93 in the last 5, while Ceuta concedes an average of 2.0 goals in the season and allows xG 1.7 (1.9 in the last 5), which strongly suggests Andorra has a high chance to score. On the other hand Ceuta scores 1.05 goals on the season and 1.2 in the last 5, and Andorra concedes an average of 1.15 goals in the season and only 0.8 in the last five games, so Ceuta’s chances to score are moderate but not nil. Considering season BTTS 60%/55%, league 56% and forms 40%/80% plus an xG advantage for the home side, I assign 62% to 'yes' and 38% to 'no' — best pick is 'yes', because Ceuta regularly concedes goals and Andorra generates sufficient chances to convert them.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of approximately 2.76 goals: FC Andorra about 1.56 and Ceuta about 1.20, based on average attack and defense (xG Andorra 1.41 vs xG conceded by Ceuta 1.7; xG Ceuta 1.09 vs xG conceded by Andorra 1.3). Andorra averages 11.95 shots and 4.45 on target per match, Ceuta 9.5 shots and 3.05 on target, with both teams posting shot conversion rates around 11%, which favors turning chances into goals. Seasonal shares of matches Over 1.5 are high: Andorra 70% and Ceuta 80%, therefore I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at about 86%. Over 2.5 looks realistic (≈62%) given seasonal rates of 55% (Andorra) and 60% (Ceuta) and the last 5 matches where both teams had 60% of games Over 2.5; Andorra scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 average), Ceuta 6 goals (1.2). Over 3.5 is less likely (≈26%) — seasonal rates are 20% and 35% and the expected total of 2.76 is clearly below 3.5, so I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1) — the model assigns it 36%. The hosts led at the break in 9 of 20 home matches (45%), while Ceuta led at the break in only 4 of 20 away matches (20%), so the home advantage is already evident by half-time. Moreover, Andorra wins 55% of home games with an average return of 1.85 points per match, whereas Ceuta wins 20% of away games with 0.9 points per match, favouring a home victory at full-time. Offensively, Andorra records 11.95 shots and 4.45 on target with a home xG of 1.41, versus Ceuta’s 9.5 shots, 3.05 on target and xG_for of 1.09; Ceuta concedes an average of 1.70 xG on the road — this confirms the greater attacking strength of the hosts. Additionally, Ceuta has conceded 9 goals in the 31–45 minute window away, while Andorra scored 4 goals in the same period at home, and the average goals at half-time are 0.75 for the hosts against 1.05 conceded by the visitors; therefore 1/1 receives the strongest backing, with alternatives like X/1 (17%) and 2/2 (14%) being less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
FC AndorraCeuta
11Shots4
FC AndorraCeuta
2Shots on target1
FC AndorraCeuta
1.25xG0.59
FC AndorraCeuta
2Corners0
FC AndorraCeuta
57Dangerous attacks36
FC AndorraCeuta
14Fouls20
FC AndorraCeuta
8Cards3
FC AndorraCeuta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.55Goals scored / game1.2
FC AndorraCeuta
1.27Goals allowed / game1.58
FC AndorraCeuta
61%Average possession50%
FC AndorraCeuta
5.1Shots on target / game3.75
FC AndorraCeuta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.45Shots per game10.73
FC AndorraCeuta
5.1Shots on target3.75
FC AndorraCeuta
10.7%Shot conversion11.2%
FC AndorraCeuta
61%Possession50%
FC AndorraCeuta
1.63xG for1.25
FC AndorraCeuta
1.33xG against1.5
FC AndorraCeuta

Shooting quality

FC Andorra: DominantCeuta: Balanced
FC AndorraCeuta
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Andorra is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - FC Andorra · 1.2 pts / game - Ceuta

FC Andorra
WWLWL
Season result split
40% W25% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-10-14
1.45 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-6-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Ceuta
DDWDL
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-10-15
1.38 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-10
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Andorra is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

1.55 goals / game - FC Andorra · 1.2 goals / game - Ceuta

FC Andorra is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.27 goals / game - FC Andorra · 1.58 goals / game - Ceuta

FC Andorra scoring profile: very strong

FC Andorra scores in 80% of games (32 of 40 meczów), while Ceuta keeps a clean sheet in 25% (10 of 40 meczów).

Ceuta scoring profile: very strong

Ceuta scores in 73% of games (29 of 40 meczów), while FC Andorra keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 40 meczów).

62Goals scored (season)48
FC AndorraCeuta
51Goals conceded (season)63
FC AndorraCeuta
2.83Average goals per game2.78
FC AndorraCeuta
11Goals scored (last 5)6
FC AndorraCeuta
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
FC AndorraCeuta

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal73%
FC AndorraCeuta
35%2 goals35%
FC AndorraCeuta
20%3 goals13%
FC AndorraCeuta
13%4 goals0%
FC AndorraCeuta

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal75%
FC AndorraCeuta
35%2 goals45%
FC AndorraCeuta
13%3 goals23%
FC AndorraCeuta
3%4 goals13%
FC AndorraCeuta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time33%
FC AndorraCeuta
3%BTTS in both halves10%
FC AndorraCeuta
25%Scored in both halves28%
FC AndorraCeuta

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
FC AndorraCeuta
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
FC AndorraCeuta
40%BTTS - last 580%
FC AndorraCeuta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FC AndorraCeuta
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
FC AndorraCeuta
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FC AndorraCeuta

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
FC AndorraCeuta
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC AndorraCeuta
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FC AndorraCeuta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Andorra - half-time state
28% leading50% draw23% trailing
Ceuta - half-time state
33% leading35% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1.33
FC AndorraCeuta
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.7
FC AndorraCeuta
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
FC AndorraCeuta
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.5
FC AndorraCeuta
57%Clean sheet before half-time45%
FC AndorraCeuta
55%No goal before half-time43%
FC AndorraCeuta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.02
FC AndorraCeuta
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
FC AndorraCeuta
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
FC AndorraCeuta
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.27
FC AndorraCeuta
48%Clean sheet after half-time48%
FC AndorraCeuta
40%No goal after half-time57%
FC AndorraCeuta

FC Andorra - second-half results

35% W33% D33% L
53
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ceuta - second-half results

13% W65% D23% L
53
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Andorra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game0.61.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.82.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ceuta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Andorra
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
8
8
16-30
11
4
31-45
9
13
46-60
8
4
61-75
20
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Ceuta
ScoredConceded
10
8
0-15
9
11
16-30
9
13
31-45
6
13
46-60
3
6
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Andorra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Ceuta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).

Teams vs league

FC AndorraLigaCeuta
Average goals per game 2.832.65 2.78
Both teams scored 63%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%51% 57%
Clean sheets 23%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 68%68% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%75% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC AndorraYellow cardDaniel Villahermosa Martínez
  2. FC AndorraGoalMartí Vilà García
  3. CeutaYellow cardAisar Ahmed Ahmed
  4. FC AndorraSubstitutionOn: Manuel Nieto SánchezOff: Marc Cardona Rovira
  5. FC AndorraSubstitutionOn: Jesús Lázaro Owono Ngua AkengOff: Kevin Nicolás Ratti Fredes
  6. FC AndorraYellow cardMartí Vilà García
  7. CeutaSubstitutionOn: Rubén Díez AdánOff: Aboubacar Bassinga
  8. FC AndorraYellow cardJesús Lázaro Owono Ngua Akeng
  9. FC AndorraYellow cardLautaro De León Billar
  10. FC AndorraYellow cardThomas Carrique
  11. FC AndorraSubstitutionOn: Álvaro Martín de FríasOff: Marc Doménech Costa
  12. FC AndorraYellow cardGael Alonso Moreno

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FC Andorra's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Ceuta. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Andorra vs Ceuta?

The Segunda División match finished FC Andorra 0:2 Ceuta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Andorra vs Ceuta?

FC Andorra score 1.55 goals per game on average and Ceuta 1.20. The Segunda División average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of FC Andorra's matches and 57% of Ceuta's.

What form are FC Andorra and Ceuta in?

Over the last 5 games FC Andorra have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Ceuta 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Andorra vs Ceuta?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Andorra vs Ceuta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.