FC Andorra vs UD Las Palmas: match statistics
FC Andorra vs UD Las Palmas: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FC Andorra played against UD Las Palmas in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
FC Andorra has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. UD Las Palmas has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
FC Andorra scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.26. UD Las Palmas scores 1.34 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of FC Andorra's games and 53% of UD Las Palmas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 42%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Andorra has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.36 per game. FC Andorra takes 14.4 shots per game, while UD Las Palmas takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
FC Andorra leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. UD Las Palmas leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.66 after halftime.
When the teams score
FC Andorra's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For UD Las Palmas, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Segunda División games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Andorra holds a slight attacking edge at home — average xG at home is 1.78 versus Las Palmas' 1.28 xG away, a differential of ~0.50 xG per match. The home side averages 15.84 shots and 4.95 on target per home game and converts 1.37 goals on average, while the visitors on the road record 11.5 shots, 3.61 on target and 1.06 goals. In the last 5 fixtures Andorra has scored 12 and conceded 3, whereas Las Palmas has 8 goals and 5 conceded, both averaging 2.4 points over that span, which underlines the home side’s recent edge. Las Palmas’ case rests on season-long defensive solidity: only 32 goals conceded all season versus Andorra’s 48, and a higher away clean sheet rate 33% vs the hosts’ 26%. Considering superior xG, greater shot volume and form over the last 5 matches, I forecast a narrow victory for the home team.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
FC Andorra averages 1.6 goals scored and concedes 0.65 per match season-to-date, while UD Las Palmas averages 1.06 scored and 1.06 conceded; these figures point to a stronger home defense. In the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS only in 20% of games, scoring 12 goals (2.4 per game) and conceding 3 (0.6), whereas the visitors had BTTS in 60%, scoring 8 goals (1.6) and conceding 5 (1.0). Home xG is 1.43 vs visitors' 1.28, and xG against is 1.02 for FC Andorra and 1.33 for Las Palmas; additionally the home side averages 4.75 shots on target compared to the opponent's 3.61 and has a higher conversion rate (13% vs 9%). Seasonally BTTS occurs for the home team in 50% of matches and for the away side in 56% against a league average of 55%, but FC Andorra has 40% clean sheets this season and recently 4 wins in 5 matches, which lowers the likelihood of both teams scoring. Therefore, weighting the low home goals conceded average (0.65) and their recent form more heavily, I tip 'No' (No Goal) at 62% vs 38% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals (xG) total 2.53: FC Andorra 1.38 xG and UD Las Palmas 1.15 xG, indicating significant goal potential. Seasonally Andorra’s matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 70% of cases and Las Palmas in 67%, while the league average is 2.64 goals per match — strong support for Over 1.5. Andorra scores 1.6 goals on average and registers 4.75 SOT with a 13% conversion, Las Palmas has 1.06 goals, 3.61 SOT and 9% conversion, so both sides create opportunities. The 2.5 line is more balanced (seasonally 45% for Andorra and 39% for Las Palmas), but in the last 5 games those values are 40% vs 60% and the combined xG 2.53 gives only a slight edge to Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely (seasonally 20% and 17%), therefore the best pick based on the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FC Andorra led at the break in 11 matches (55%) and scores on average 0.95 goals in the first half while conceding only 0.35; UD Las Palmas averages just 0.39 goals and 0.39 conceded in the first 45 minutes. Over full matches the home side score 1.6 goals on average versus 1.06 for the visitors, have a higher xG (1.43 vs 1.28) and a 60% win rate versus Las Palmas’ 33%, suggesting the HT advantage has a chance to hold to the end. The hosts also keep a clean sheet at the break in 70% of games and there is a low percentage of both teams scoring before half-time (15%), so the first half often finishes with Andorra leading without goal exchanges. Las Palmas show stronger numbers in second halves (on average 0.67 goals in the second half and 72% of matches with at least one goal after the break), but their low first-half average (0.39) and lower xG reduce the probability of a turnaround. For these reasons I select 1/1 as the strongest signal (45%), while variants such as 1/X (12%) or X/X (12%) are less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FC Andorra | UD Las Palmas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Andorra is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - FC Andorra · 1.34 goals / game - UD Las Palmas
UD Las Palmas is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - FC Andorra · 0.84 goals / game - UD Las Palmas
FC Andorra scores in 79% of games (30 of 38 meczów), while UD Las Palmas keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 meczów).
UD Las Palmas scores in 76% of games (29 of 38 meczów), while FC Andorra keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Andorra
Over / Under - UD Las Palmas
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UD Las Palmas is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - FC Andorra · 1.61 pts / game - UD Las Palmas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Andorra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
UD Las Palmas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FC Andorra
UD Las Palmas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| FC Andorra | Liga | UD Las Palmas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.74 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 68% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FC Andorra's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against UD Las Palmas. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Andorra vs UD Las Palmas?
The Segunda División match finished FC Andorra 5:1 UD Las Palmas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Andorra vs UD Las Palmas?
FC Andorra score 1.47 goals per game on average and UD Las Palmas 1.34. The Segunda División average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 61% of FC Andorra's matches and 53% of UD Las Palmas's.
What form are FC Andorra and UD Las Palmas in?
Over the last 5 games FC Andorra have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and UD Las Palmas 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Andorra vs UD Las Palmas?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


