Romania - Liga IIData current as of October 16, 2026

FC Bacău vs Slatina: match statistics

FC Bacău crest
FC Bacău
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Slatina crest
Slatina

FC Bacău vs Slatina: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Bacău played against Slatina in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on August 31, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

FC Bacău has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. Slatina has 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Bacău scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 1.25. Slatina scores 2.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of FC Bacău's games and 50% of Slatina's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Slatina has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.44 per game. FC Bacău takes 9.8 shots per game, while Slatina takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Bacău leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Slatina leads at halftime in 75% and scores 1.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Bacău's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Slatina, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Bacău are very strong at home: they have won both of their home matches so far, averaging 3 goals scored and conceding none. Slatina lead the league after 4 wins in 4 rounds, while they have won 4 of their last five matches, conceding just 3 goals. However, the visitors create more chances away from home, averaging 12 shots and an xG of 1.52, compared with FC Bacău’s 7 shots and xG of 1.19. The hosts make up for this with exceptional efficiency, converting 43% of their shots into goals in home matches, while Slatina convert just 13%; however, such a high conversion rate for Bacău may be difficult to sustain. The clash between the hosts’ flawless defense and the league leaders’ excellent form suggests a closely contested match, with a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate for both teams stands at 50%, but over their last five matches it has fallen to 40% for FC Bacău and just 20% for Slatina. Slatina have conceded only 3 goals during this period, averaging 0.6 per match, while their average xG conceded is 1.22, which strengthens the likelihood of keeping the hosts at bay. FC Bacău are highly effective at home, scoring an average of 3.5 goals with an xG of 2.02, but Slatina have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season. The visitors have also scored in every match this season and are averaging 2.2 goals per game across their last five, yet the hosts likewise have a 50% clean-sheet rate and concede only 0.5 goals on average. Therefore, BTTS - No is the more likely outcome, meaning that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither side scores—particularly given both teams’ solid defensive metrics and the declining BTTS frequency in their current form.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Bacău have averaged 2.6 goals across their last five matches, while Slatina have averaged 2.2, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Both teams have scored in 100% of their matches so far this season, while the hosts have exceeded 1.5 goals in every game, compared with 50% for the visitors. Their creative potential is also high: average xG stands at 2.02 for Bacău and 1.52 for Slatina, alongside 7.5 and 5.5 shots on target per match, respectively. Although both defenses concede just 0.5 goals on average, recent attacking form and a projected total of 2.65 goals provide the strongest case for Over 1.5 goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced, as Slatina have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, making Over 1.5 the safer betting edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FC Bacău have a clear first-half profile: in the current sample, they led at the break in 2 of 2 matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and conceding none. Slatina average only 0.5 goals before half-time, and in their last five matches they were level after 45 minutes in 60% of cases, compared with 20% for the hosts. Bacău’s advantage in chance creation is also reflected in their average xG of 2.02 versus 1.52, as well as in shots on target, 7.5 to 5.5. After the break, the hosts still look solid, averaging 1.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, making a Bacău lead at half-time followed by a full-time win the strongest scenario. Slatina’s good form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, should be taken into account; however, the hosts’ advantage in starting matches strongly supports the 1/1 HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
FC BacăuSlatina
8Shots3
FC BacăuSlatina
3Shots on target0
FC BacăuSlatina
1.16xG0.73
FC BacăuSlatina
6Corners5
FC BacăuSlatina
62Dangerous attacks73
FC BacăuSlatina
8Fouls12
FC BacăuSlatina
0Cards0
FC BacăuSlatina

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.5Goals scored / game2.5
FC BacăuSlatina
1.25Goals allowed / game0.5
FC BacăuSlatina
47%Average possession57%
FC BacăuSlatina
5.25Shots on target / game6.5
FC BacăuSlatina

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.75Shots per game14.25
FC BacăuSlatina
5.25Shots on target6.5
FC BacăuSlatina
25.6%Shot conversion17.5%
FC BacăuSlatina
47%Possession57%
FC BacăuSlatina
1.44xG for1.77
FC BacăuSlatina
1.51xG against1.34
FC BacăuSlatina

Shooting quality

FC Bacău: Counter-attackingSlatina: Dominant
FC BacăuSlatina
Accuracy (shots on target)54%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Slatina is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / game - FC Bacău · 3 pts / game - Slatina

FC Bacău
WLWD
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Slatina
WWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Slatina is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - FC Bacău · 0.5 goals / game - Slatina

FC Bacău scoring profile: very strong

FC Bacău scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Slatina keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).

Slatina scoring profile: very strong

Slatina scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while FC Bacău keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).

10Goals scored (season)10
FC BacăuSlatina
5Goals conceded (season)2
FC BacăuSlatina
3.75Average goals per game3
FC BacăuSlatina
10Goals scored (last 5)10
FC BacăuSlatina
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
FC BacăuSlatina

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
FC BacăuSlatina
100%2 goals75%
FC BacăuSlatina
50%3 goals25%
FC BacăuSlatina
0%4 goals25%
FC BacăuSlatina

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
FC BacăuSlatina
50%2 goals0%
FC BacăuSlatina
25%3 goals0%
FC BacăuSlatina
0%4 goals0%
FC BacăuSlatina

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
FC BacăuSlatina
25%BTTS in both halves0%
FC BacăuSlatina
100%Scored in both halves75%
FC BacăuSlatina

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FC BacăuSlatina
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FC BacăuSlatina
50%BTTS - last 550%
FC BacăuSlatina

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FC BacăuSlatina
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
FC BacăuSlatina
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FC BacăuSlatina

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FC BacăuSlatina
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC BacăuSlatina
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FC BacăuSlatina

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Slatina is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / game - FC Bacău · 2.5 pts / game - Slatina

FC Bacău - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Slatina - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)2.5
FC BacăuSlatina
1.25Goals scored (1st half)1.25
FC BacăuSlatina
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0
FC BacăuSlatina
2Average goals (1st half)1.25
FC BacăuSlatina
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
FC BacăuSlatina
0%No goal before half-time25%
FC BacăuSlatina

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per game (2nd half)2.5
FC BacăuSlatina
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
FC BacăuSlatina
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
FC BacăuSlatina
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.75
FC BacăuSlatina
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC BacăuSlatina
0%No goal after half-time0%
FC BacăuSlatina

FC Bacău - second-half results

75% W0% D25% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Slatina - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FC Bacău - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.752.25
Goals scored / game1.31.3
Goals allowed / game0.80.5
Average goals per game2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 5
Slatina - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.502.50
Goals scored / game1.31.3
Goals allowed / game0.00.5
Average goals per game1.31.8
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal25%0%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Bacău
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Slatina
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Bacău

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Slatina

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
214%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

FC BacăuLigaSlatina
Average goals per game▲ 3.752.67▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 50%57%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%54%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%23%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%78%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FC Bacău's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Slatina. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Bacău vs Slatina?

The Liga II match finished FC Bacău 0:0 Slatina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Bacău vs Slatina?

FC Bacău score 2.50 goals per game on average and Slatina 2.50. The Liga II average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FC Bacău's matches and 50% of Slatina's.

What form are FC Bacău and Slatina in?

Over the last 5 games FC Bacău have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Slatina 4-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Bacău vs Slatina?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Bacău vs Slatina: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.