FC Caspiy vs Irtysh: match statistics
FC Caspiy vs Irtysh: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FC Caspiy played against Irtysh in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
FC Caspiy has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Irtysh has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
FC Caspiy scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.20. Irtysh scores 1.00 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.10 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of FC Caspiy's games and 60% of Irtysh's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 50%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Irtysh has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 0.95 per game. FC Caspiy takes 8.4 shots per game, while Irtysh takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
FC Caspiy leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.30 goals per game after halftime. Irtysh leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
FC Caspiy's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Irtysh, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kazakhstan Premier League games average 2.10 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Caspiy holds a clear advantage in form and home status — over the last 5 matches they have averaged 1.2 points per game and won 2 of 5 (2-0-3), while Irtysh has failed to win in their last 5 fixtures (0-1-4) and averages only 0.2 points per game. Offensively Irtysh shows better numbers — averaging 1.00 goals on the road versus 0.67 for the hosts, higher xG (1.36 vs 1.23), more shots on target (5.2 vs 3.0) and higher conversion rate (9% vs 6%). At the same time the visitors are more vulnerable defensively: they concede 1.6 goals on average away compared to Caspiy’s 1.33 at home and have a higher xG against (1.88 vs 1.5), and they have not recorded an away win yet (Win% 0). Caspiy keep clean sheets at home more often (CS% 33 vs 0) and have a lower share of matches without scoring (FTS 33% vs 40%), which together with better PPG in the last 5 matches gives them a tangible advantage. For these reasons I assess the hosts as more likely to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 60% (FC Caspiy 60% and Irtysh 60%), well above the league average of 51%, which is a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. Additionally, Irtysh have no clean sheets this season (0%), and their attack averages 5.2 shots on target and xG 1.36 versus FC Caspiy’s 3.4 shots on target and xG 1.16, so both sides are able to create chances. Against this plays recent form: BTTS has dropped to 20% for the home side and 40% for the away side over the last 5 matches, and both teams have averaged only 0.6 goals each across the past five fixtures, which reduces prediction confidence. Considering the dominant season-long 60/60 signal and Irtysh’s lack of clean sheets (0%), but also the weaker recent form and the league clean sheet rate at 60%, I assign 60% to Yes (BTTS - Yes) and 40% to No (No Goal) as the most balanced forecast.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on the home xG of 1.16 and Irtysh’s average xG conceded of 1.88, I estimate FC Caspiy should score around 1.52 goals ((1.16+1.88)/2). Irtysh have xG 1.36 while Caspiy’s opponents concede xG 1.4, yielding about 1.38 goals for the visitors and a total expected goals of 2.90. Season metrics show over 1.5 occurred in 60% of home matches and 60% of away matches, and both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals, which strengthens the signal for at least 2 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.90 gives roughly a 79% chance of Over 1.5, about 55% for Over 2.5 and only about 33% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest and safest option is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X) — I assign it a 31% probability because the away side has been level at the break in 5 of 5 matches (100%), and draws occur in 40% of home matches and 40% of away matches this season. At half-time the home team averages 0.6 goals and the away team only 0.2 (0.6 vs 0.2), while the average goals at half-time are 1.2 versus 0.4 (1.2 vs 0.4), which favors low scores and draws at the break. A full-time draw also appears likely: the home team has won only 20% of matches, the away team has recorded no wins (0%), and both teams score in 60% of matches, which together reinforces the X/X scenario. However, the home side led at half-time in 2 of the last 5 matches (40%) and collects on average 1.4 points by half-time versus 1.0 for the away team (1.4 vs 1.0), so the 1/1 scenario is given 15% as a realistic alternative. Additionally, the teams’ xG figures are similar (1.16 versus 1.36), indicating no clear advantage in chance creation and justifying a cautious allocation of weights between draws and narrow wins (e.g. 1/1 = 15%, 2/2 = 3%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FC Caspiy | Irtysh | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Caspiy is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - FC Caspiy · 0.2 pts / game - Irtysh
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Irtysh is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - FC Caspiy · 1 goals / game - Irtysh
FC Caspiy is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - FC Caspiy · 1.4 goals / game - Irtysh
FC Caspiy scores in 50% of games (5 of 10 meczów), while Irtysh keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).
Irtysh scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while FC Caspiy keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Caspiy
Over / Under - Irtysh
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Irtysh is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - FC Caspiy · 1.2 pts / game - Irtysh
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Caspiy - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Irtysh - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FC Caspiy
Irtysh
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| FC Caspiy | Liga | Irtysh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.70 | 2.10 | ▲ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 49% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 37% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 31% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 69% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Caspiy vs Irtysh?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished FC Caspiy 2:2 Irtysh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Caspiy vs Irtysh?
FC Caspiy score 0.50 goals per game on average and Irtysh 1.00. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 30% of FC Caspiy's matches and 60% of Irtysh's.
What form are FC Caspiy and Irtysh in?
Over the last 5 games FC Caspiy have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Irtysh 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Caspiy vs Irtysh?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


