FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: match statistics
FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FC Cetatea Suceava played against CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Stadionul Areni. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
FC Cetatea Suceava has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
FC Cetatea Suceava scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.50. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores 1.17 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of FC Cetatea Suceava's games and 67% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Cetatea Suceava has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.27 per game. FC Cetatea Suceava takes 14.8 shots per game, while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
FC Cetatea Suceava leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
FC Cetatea Suceava's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea have an excellent away record: they have won both of their matches on the road so far, averaging 1.50 goals scored and conceding just 0.50 per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away fixtures, while FC Cetatea Suceava concede an average of 1.33 goals at home. The hosts create more chances, as reflected by their xG of 1.59 compared with the visitors’ 0.99, as well as 12.67 shots per match. However, their conversion rate is only 11%, compared with 23% for the Râmnicu Vâlcea side. Cetatea’s form is weaker, having collected 4 points and lost 3 times in their last five matches, while their opponents have earned 5 points. The visitors’ defensive edge, perfect away record to date and greater efficiency in front of goal point towards a narrow win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS scenario is slightly more likely, as the hosts have recorded both teams scoring in 75% of their matches, while both sides have reached 60% over their last five games. Cetatea have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.5 goals per match, which supports a goal for the visitors, who score an average of 1.5 goals per game this season. The hosts should also create chances, averaging 4.5 shots on target compared with just 2.5 for Râmnicu Vâlcea, while their average xG stands at 1.41. The main risk to the pick is the visitors’ defense, which keeps a clean sheet in 50% of matches and concedes an average of just 0.5 goals; however, their last five games have produced 1.2 goals conceded per match. Overall, both teams’ metrics are close to the league BTTS rate of 62%, which is why the selection is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The 2.50-goal projection is based on the home side creating an average of 1.41 xG, with the visitors’ defense allowing 1.36 xG, while Râmnicu Vâlcea’s attack produces 0.99 xG against the home team’s 1.27 xG. In their last five matches, both teams went over 2.5 goals in only 40% of cases, although their matches averaged 2.8 and 2.2 goals respectively. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches and was never involved in a game with at least 4 goals, while this occurred in just 25% of Cetatea’s matches. Additionally, neither team averages more than 0.5 goals after half-time, limiting the risk of a late high-scoring outcome. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the data points to a realistic chance of two or three goals, but a significantly lower probability of four.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea have a significantly stronger season record: they have won 100% of their matches and average 3.0 points per game, while Cetatea Suceava have yet to win and average only 0.5 points. The visitors concede just 0.5 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, whereas the hosts concede an average of 1.5 goals and have not yet kept a clean sheet. Before the break, Vâlcea score an average of 1.0 goals and have conceded none, while Suceava concede 0.75 goals in this period, reinforcing the scenario of the visitors taking the lead at the break. After half-time, the hosts score only 0.25 goals while conceding 0.75, whereas the visitors have averages of 0.5 scored and 0.5 conceded. Therefore, the most likely outcome is for Vâlcea to maintain their lead until full-time, making the HT/FT pick 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FC Cetatea Suceava | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Cetatea Suceava is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.4 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cetatea Suceava is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.17 goals / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.17 goals / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
FC Cetatea Suceava scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while FC Cetatea Suceava keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Cetatea Suceava
Over / Under - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.83 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Cetatea Suceava - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FC Cetatea Suceava
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| FC Cetatea Suceava | Liga | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.89 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?
The Liga II match finished FC Cetatea Suceava 4:0 CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?
FC Cetatea Suceava score 1.50 goals per game on average and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1.17. The Liga II average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FC Cetatea Suceava's matches and 67% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's.
What form are FC Cetatea Suceava and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in?
Over the last 5 games FC Cetatea Suceava have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


