United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of October 28, 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
3 : 3half-time 1:2
Charlotte crest
Charlotte

FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Cincinnati played against Charlotte in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Recent form

FC Cincinnati has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Charlotte has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Cincinnati scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 2.43. Charlotte scores 1.75 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 74% of FC Cincinnati's games and 67% of Charlotte's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 67%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.39 per game. FC Cincinnati takes 13.3 shots per game, while Charlotte takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Charlotte leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Cincinnati's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Charlotte, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati have a clear home advantage: they win 64% of their home matches, score an average of 2.82 goals and create chances worth 1.73 xG per game. Away from home, Charlotte score just 1.40 goals with 1.20 xG and lose 50% of such fixtures, although the hosts also concede heavily, averaging 1.91 goals per match. Cincinnati attack more frequently and accurately, averaging 15.73 shots and 6.64 shots on target, compared with their opponents’ 9.7 attempts and 3.9 on target. Overall form, however, favors Charlotte, who are unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding 5, while Cincinnati have managed just 5 goals and conceded 9. The hosts’ superior home performance should give them a slight edge, but the visitors’ strong run increases the likelihood of a tight, high-scoring match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

FC Cincinnati have recorded BTTS in 69% of their matches, while Charlotte have done so in 60%, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Charlotte concede as many as 1.9 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 20% of their games. Charlotte are, however, in good attacking form: they have scored 11 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.2 per game, while Cincinnati have conceded 9 goals over the same period. In addition, both teams have created solid chances in their last five appearances, with an average xG of 1.71 for Cincinnati and 1.43 for Charlotte. The scenario in which both teams score is therefore clearly more likely than the BTTS - No outcome, meaning that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Cincinnati average 2.0 goals per match, while Charlotte concede an average of 1.9, clearly supporting at least two goals for the home side or a high total-goals tally. Charlotte have been highly effective recently, scoring 11 goals in five matches, while Cincinnati have conceded 9 goals over the same period. The 1.5 line was covered in 69% of Cincinnati’s matches and in as many as 90% of Charlotte’s games, while both teams scored Over 0.5 goals in virtually every away fixture. In addition, the average xG figures stand at 1.53 for Cincinnati and 1.20 for Charlotte, with both teams recording high percentages of matches in which both sides scored: 69% and 60%, respectively. Over 1.5 goals therefore has the strongest support from both season-long profiles and Charlotte’s current attacking form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Charlotte win, as both teams are relatively cautious before the break: Cincinnati concede an average of 0.54 goals in that period, while Charlotte concede 0.80. However, Charlotte are clearly more effective in their current form, averaging 2.2 goals scored and just 1.0 conceded over their last five matches, whereas Cincinnati score only 1.0 and concede 1.8. The second half could be decisive, with the hosts averaging just 0.2 goals scored and as many as 1.4 conceded in their last five matches, while the visitors score 1.2 and concede only 0.6. Charlotte have lost none of their last five matches, winning three of them, while Cincinnati have suffered two defeats during that period. Cincinnati's season-long home advantage is reflected in 1.92 points per match compared with Charlotte's 1.10, but the visitors' current form and stronger second-half performances reinforce the X/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

69Possession (%)31
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
29Shots8
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
10Shots on target4
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
3.39xG0.97
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
12Corners3
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
122Dangerous attacks25
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
6Fouls10
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2Cards1
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.13Goals scored / game1.75
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.43Goals allowed / game1.38
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
50%Average possession46%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
5.78Shots on target / game4.92
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.35Shots per game11.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
5.78Shots on target4.92
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
16%Shot conversion15%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
50%Possession46%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.53xG for1.39
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.81xG against1.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingCharlotte: Counter-attacking
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Charlotte is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 2.2 pts / game - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati
DWDLL
Season result split
35% W30% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-8
1.35 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Charlotte
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
46% W25% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-7
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

2.13 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.75 goals / game - Charlotte

Charlotte is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.43 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.38 goals / game - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 games), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).

Charlotte scoring profile: very strong

Charlotte scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 games), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 games).

49Goals scored (season)42
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
56Goals conceded (season)33
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
4.57Average goals per game3.13
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
4Goals scored (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
12Goals conceded (last 5)5
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal79%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
61%2 goals58%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
39%3 goals25%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
22%4 goals4%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal79%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
65%2 goals33%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
43%3 goals17%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
26%4 goals8%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

57%BTTS at half-time33%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
39%BTTS in both halves8%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
48%Scored in both halves38%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
60%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
48%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charlotte is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.54 pts / game - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
26% leading43% draw30% trailing
Charlotte - half-time state
38% leading42% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per game (1st half)1.54
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1Goals scored (1st half)0.79
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.04Average goals (1st half)1.46
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
35%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
26%No goal before half-time42%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per game (2nd half)1.5
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.52Average goals (2nd half)1.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
22%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
43%No goal after half-time42%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

35% W22% D43% L
28
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Charlotte - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Charlotte - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game0.81.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
10
16-30
13
11
31-45
6
13
46-60
3
5
61-75
17
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Charlotte
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
5
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.84
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Charlotte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaCharlotte
Average goals per game▲ 4.573.21• 3.13
Both teams scored▲ 74%64%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%62%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 9%21%• 21%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%77%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%82%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiGoalPavel BuchaAssist: Tom Barlow
  2. CharlotteGoalPep Biel Mas Jaume
  3. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Rodolfo AlokoOff: Liel Abada
  4. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke DenkeyAssist: Andrei Chirila
  5. CharlotteGoalIdan GurnoAssist: Rodolfo Aloko
  6. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Bryan Josías Ramírez LeónOff: Tom Barlow
  7. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Brandt BronicoOff: Lucas Daniel de la Torre
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardSamuel Gidi
  9. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Morrison AgyemangOff: Will Cleary
  10. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Tyger SmallsOff: Idan Gurno
  11. FC CincinnatiYellow cardKenji Mboma Dem
  12. CharlotteYellow cardRodolfo Aloko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FC Cincinnati's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Charlotte. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 3:3 Charlotte. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

FC Cincinnati score 2.13 goals per game on average and Charlotte 1.75. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 74% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 67% of Charlotte's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Charlotte in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Charlotte 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.