United States - MLSData current as of September 08, 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

155%(1.65)
X25%(3.85)
220%(4.30)

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Cincinnati played against Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Recent form

FC Cincinnati has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.75 points per game. Montreal Impact has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 0.75 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Cincinnati scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 2.00. Montreal Impact scores 1.00 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 25% of FC Cincinnati's games and 25% of Montreal Impact's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 100%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.00 per game. FC Cincinnati takes 13.3 shots per game, while Montreal Impact takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Cincinnati's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Montreal Impact, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
3 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
15Shots19
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Shots on target7
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.71xG2.07
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Corners2
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
27Dangerous attacks54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
18Fouls10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
6Cards1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.75Goals scored / game1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Goals allowed / game2.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Average possession46%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
4.5Shots on target / game3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.25Shots per game9.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
4.5Shots on target3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
5.7%Shot conversion10.5%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Possession46%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.45xG for1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.46xG against1.62
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: BalancedMontreal Impact: Balanced
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Cincinnati
WLLL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Montreal Impact
LLWL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montreal Impact is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

0.75 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1 goals / game - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 2.5 goals / game - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: strong

Montreal Impact scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).

3Goals scored (season)4
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Goals conceded (season)10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2.75Average goals per game3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
3Goals scored (last 5)4
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%2 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%3 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%4 goals0%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%2 goals75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%3 goals50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%4 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%Scored in both halves25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%BTTS - last 525%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per game (1st half)0.75
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.75
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1Average goals (1st half)2
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%Clean sheet before half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%No goal before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per game (2nd half)1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%No goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

25% W0% R75% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.750.75
Goals scored / game0.30.5
Goals allowed / game0.81.3
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal25%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet75%25%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 0% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Montreal Impact - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.751.00
Goals scored / game0.80.3
Goals allowed / game1.31.3
Average goals per game2.01.5
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals per game 2.752.99 3.50
Both teams scored 25%49% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%59% 100%
Clean sheets 25%29% 25%
Goal before half-time 25%72% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+87%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defensive advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Montreal ImpactGoalPrince-Osei OwusuAssist: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  2. Montreal ImpactYellow cardHennadiy Synchuk
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Kwadwo OpokuOff: Hennadiy Synchuk
  4. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Dag­ur Dan Þór­halls­sonOff: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  5. FC CincinnatiRed cardMiles Robinson
  6. FC CincinnatiYellow cardMatt Miazga
  7. Montreal ImpactGoalPrince-Osei Owusu
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardObinna Nwobodo
  9. FC CincinnatiGoalTom Barlow
  10. FC CincinnatiYellow cardTeenage Lingani Hadebe
  11. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Olger EscobarOff: Matthew Longstaff
  12. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Stiven JimenezOff: Obinna Nwobodo
  13. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke Denkey
  14. FC CincinnatiYellow cardAhoueke Denkey

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filip DujicMatches officiated: 8
4.88Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins38%Draws13%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 4:3 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

FC Cincinnati score 0.75 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.00. The MLS average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 25% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 25% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.