United States - MLSToyota StadiumData current as of September 13, 2026

FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

FC Dallas crest
FC Dallas
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers

FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Dallas played against Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

FC Dallas has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Portland Timbers has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Dallas scores 1.96 goals per game and allows 1.71. Portland Timbers scores 1.92 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of FC Dallas's games and 79% of Portland Timbers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 75%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Portland Timbers has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.38 per game. FC Dallas takes 12.2 shots per game, while Portland Timbers takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Dallas leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Dallas's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Portland Timbers, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Dallas have a clearly stronger home profile, averaging 2.2 goals per match, compared with Portland Timbers’ 1.36 away goals per game. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in that run, while the visitors have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over the same period, with 11 goals scored. Portland have lost as many as 64% of their away matches, have kept no clean sheets and allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.21 xG, which favors Dallas’ attacking efficiency. Dallas also have defensive issues, conceding 1.9 goals per home match and keeping a clean sheet in only 10% of their appearances, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario. The hosts’ superior conversion rate—18% compared with Portland’s 11%—and significantly stronger home results support a Dallas victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is very strong: FC Dallas recorded BTTS in 92% of their matches this season, while Portland did so in 64%, compared with the league average of 63%. In their last five matches, Portland registered BTTS in 100% of cases and Dallas in 80%, with the teams scoring an average of 2.2 and 2.8 goals respectively. Both defenses regularly allow opponents to create chances: Dallas conceded 3.0 goals per match recently, Portland 2.0, while their average xG against stands at 1.83 and 2.02 respectively. Portland have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, while Dallas have done so in only 8% of games, significantly increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. The hosts are particularly dangerous in attack, averaging 2.42 goals and 5.08 shots on target per match, while the visitors should be able to exploit Dallas's defensive weaknesses despite their lower shooting efficiency. This strongly supports the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal market, rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 result or a match in which neither side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: FC Dallas average 2.42 goals scored, while Portland concede 1.91 goals per game. In their last five appearances, Dallas scored 14 and conceded 15 goals, while Portland recorded 11 goals scored and 10 conceded, presenting a very open profile for both teams. At least 2 goals were scored in 100% of the league matches involving each team, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 100% of Dallas’s last five matches and 80% of Portland’s. Additionally, Dallas’s average xG stands at 1.57, compared with 2.21 xG conceded by Portland, meaning the hosts should create a particularly high number of high-quality chances. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as even with a partial regression in finishing efficiency, the expected 3.65 goals provide this line with a very high margin of safety.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FC Dallas has a clearly stronger home record: they win 58% of their matches and score an average of 2.42 goals, while Portland lose as many as 64% of their away games and concede 1.91 goals per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances in the opposition half, with an xG of 1.57 compared with Portland’s 1.41, and average 5.08 shots on target versus 4.09 for the visitors. The signal for Dallas to lead at the break is further strengthened by the fact that Portland were behind at half-time in 55% of their away matches, while the hosts score an average of 1.17 goals before the interval. Dallas are particularly dangerous after the break, scoring an average of 1.25 goals and losing the second half in only 8% of matches, which favors them maintaining or extending their advantage. However, both defenses are prone to conceding, so the draw-at-half-time and home-win-at-full-time scenarios remain significant, although the highest-rated outcome is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
FC DallasPortland Timbers
9Shots18
FC DallasPortland Timbers
5Shots on target4
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.11xG1.73
FC DallasPortland Timbers
7Corners5
FC DallasPortland Timbers
27Dangerous attacks45
FC DallasPortland Timbers
13Fouls4
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1Cards0
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.96Goals scored / game1.92
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.71Goals allowed / game1.88
FC DallasPortland Timbers
42%Average possession50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4.75Shots on target / game4.54
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.21Shots per game13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4.75Shots on target4.54
FC DallasPortland Timbers
16%Shot conversion14.7%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
42%Possession50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.38xG for1.5
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.49xG against1.88
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

FC Dallas: Counter-attackingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
FC DallasPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Dallas is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - FC Dallas · 1.6 pts / game - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas
WLDWW
Season result split
46% W29% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-6
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Portland Timbers
WDLWD
Season result split
38% W21% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-10
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Dallas is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.71 goals / game - FC Dallas · 1.88 goals / game - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas scoring profile: very strong

FC Dallas scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 meczów).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 meczów), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).

47Goals scored (season)46
FC DallasPortland Timbers
41Goals conceded (season)45
FC DallasPortland Timbers
3.67Average goals per game3.79
FC DallasPortland Timbers
13Goals scored (last 5)12
FC DallasPortland Timbers
15Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC DallasPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal83%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
67%2 goals58%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%3 goals21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
17%4 goals13%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal96%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
50%2 goals63%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
29%3 goals21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4%4 goals8%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

79%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 24 meczów
63%
League average

Goal patterns

46%BTTS at half-time42%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
29%BTTS in both halves8%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
50%Scored in both halves46%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
80%BTTS - last 5100%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
46%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Dallas is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - FC Dallas · 1.13 pts / game - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
29% leading25% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.04Goals scored (1st half)0.92
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
2.04Average goals (1st half)2.04
FC DallasPortland Timbers
46%Clean sheet before half-time21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%No goal before half-time38%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.58
FC DallasPortland Timbers
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1
FC DallasPortland Timbers
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.75
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%No goal after half-time33%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

FC Dallas - second-half results

29% W50% D21% L
33
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

42% W33% D25% L
27
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Dallas - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game1.41.2
Goals allowed / game1.81.2
Average goals per game3.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Portland Timbers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game1.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game2.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Dallas
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
8
16-30
10
10
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
8
61-75
13
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
10
8
16-30
6
9
31-45
5
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.73
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Dallas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC DallasLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals per game 3.673.20 3.79
Both teams scored 67%63% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%62% 75%
Clean sheets 17%21% 4%
Goal before half-time 71%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC DallasGoalLogan FarringtonAssist: Shaquell Moore
  2. FC DallasYellow cardKaick da Silva Ferreira
  3. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Ariel LassiterOff: Julio Joao Ortiz Landázuri
  4. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Gage GuerraOff: Omir Fernandez
  5. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Kamal Anthony MillerOff: Ian Smith
  6. FC DallasSubstitutionOn: Lalas AbubakarOff: Bernard Kamungo
  7. Portland TimbersGoalAriel LassiterAssist: Gage Guerra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FC Dallas's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Portland Timbers. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished FC Dallas 2:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

FC Dallas score 1.96 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.92. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FC Dallas's matches and 79% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are FC Dallas and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games FC Dallas have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.