FCSB vs Metaloglobus: match statistics
FCSB clearly dominates this matchup in every statistical aspect. The hosts sit 10th in the table with a record of 11 wins and solid form (3 wins in the last 5 matches), while Metaloglobus ranks 16th with just 2 victories all season. The key difference is visible in the visitors' away matches – 0% wins, 85% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -24. FCSB wins 46% of cases at home, scoring an average of 1.15 goals with an xG of 1.99, indicating untapped offensive potential. Metaloglobus concedes an average of 2.69 goals per match on the road and has not kept a single clean sheet. The form of both teams (FCSB: wwwdl vs Metaloglobus: llldl) and the advantage in possession (60% vs 47%) further confirm the decided advantage of the hosts.
FCSB vs Metaloglobus: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCSB played against Metaloglobus in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on February 23, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
FCSB has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Metaloglobus has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
FCSB scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.26. Metaloglobus scores 0.78 and allows 2.15. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of FCSB's games and 56% of Metaloglobus's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 63%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FCSB has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.32 per game. FCSB takes 17.7 shots per game, while Metaloglobus takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
FCSB leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Metaloglobus leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCSB's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Metaloglobus, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FCSB clearly dominates this matchup in every statistical aspect. The hosts sit 10th in the table with a record of 11 wins and solid form (3 wins in the last 5 matches), while Metaloglobus ranks 16th with just 2 victories all season. The key difference is visible in the visitors' away matches – 0% wins, 85% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -24. FCSB wins 46% of cases at home, scoring an average of 1.15 goals with an xG of 1.99, indicating untapped offensive potential. Metaloglobus concedes an average of 2.69 goals per match on the road and has not kept a single clean sheet. The form of both teams (FCSB: wwwdl vs Metaloglobus: llldl) and the advantage in possession (60% vs 47%) further confirm the decided advantage of the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 85% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - FCSB · 0.78 goals / game - Metaloglobus
FCSB is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - FCSB · 2.15 goals / game - Metaloglobus
FCSB scores in 81% of games (22 of 27 meczów), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 27 meczów).
Metaloglobus scores in 56% of games (15 of 27 meczów), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCSB
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 221% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - FCSB · 0.52 pts / game - Metaloglobus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 41%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 7%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCSB
Metaloglobus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.70 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 47% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 28% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 70% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from FCSB's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Metaloglobus. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 4:1 Metaloglobus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
FCSB score 1.44 goals per game on average and Metaloglobus 0.78. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FCSB's matches and 56% of Metaloglobus's.
What form are FCSB and Metaloglobus in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Metaloglobus 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs Metaloglobus?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCSB vs Metaloglobus: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.