FCSB vs SSC Farul: match statistics
FCSB vs SSC Farul: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCSB played against SSC Farul in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on August 3, 2026. Venue: Arena Naţională. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
FCSB has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. SSC Farul has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
FCSB scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.00. SSC Farul scores 1.50 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of FCSB's games and 50% of SSC Farul's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SSC Farul has the higher season xG average, 2.19 to 1.90 per game. FCSB takes 17.0 shots per game, while SSC Farul takes 21.0.
First-half and second-half trends
FCSB leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. SSC Farul leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCSB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For SSC Farul, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because FCSB has outstanding home metrics: 100% wins and 100% clean sheets in home matches, averaging 2.0 goals per home game and 12 goals in the last five matches. SSC Farul struggles away – stats show 100% away losses and an average of 2.0 goals conceded on the road with no clean sheets, which weakens their prospects. In terms of chance quality Farul generates higher xG away (1.91 vs 1.38 xG for FCSB at home) and more shot attempts (avg. 22 vs 12), but their efficiency is very low: 5% shot conversion and only 4 on-target shots on average, while FCSB posts 17% conversion and 5 on-target shots. Additionally, opponents produced on average 2.14 xG at FCSB’s ground, yet the hosts concede 0.0 goals per home game and record 2.4 points on average in the last 5 matches versus 1.4 points for Farul, giving the hosts the edge in form and efficiency. Based on this I assess the probabilities as: FCSB 70%, draw 18% and SSC Farul win 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis leads me to select “no” (No BTTS) due to the hosts’ very strong defense: FCSB averages 2.0 goals scored per game and concedes 0.0 on the season (100% clean sheets). Home xG is 2.46 vs 1.91 for Farul, while xG against is 0.87 for FCSB vs 1.17 for Farul, indicating superior quality chances for the hosts and simultaneous defensive resilience. The difference in shot accuracy is significant — FCSB averages 10 on-target shots from 20 attempts, whereas Farul has only 4 on target from 22 attempts and a lower conversion rate (5% vs the hosts’ 10%), reducing the visitors’ realistic goal-scoring chances. Although Farul has a season BTTS of 100% and both teams show 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches, BTTS occurs less frequently in the league (38%) and the hosts have 0% BTTS at home and 100% clean sheets, so the stronger signal favors neither team scoring. Based on these numbers I assess BTTS probability at 30% for “yes” and 70% for “no”, hence the recommendation: “no”.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model estimates 1.82 xG for FCSB and 1.39 xG for SSC Farul, totaling 3.21 expected goals in the match. FCSB has a clear quality advantage: attacking xG 2.46 versus Farul's 1.91 and an average of 10 shots on target per game compared to 4 for the opponent, with shot conversion rates of 10% vs 5%. In the last 5 matches FCSB averaged 2.4 goals, Farul 2.2, and the league has a seasonal average of 2.75 goals per game, confirming a tendency toward multi-goal matches. With an expected total of 3.21, a Poisson distribution yields roughly an 83% probability for Over 1.5, about 62% for Over 2.5 and around 40% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the best option; Over 2.5 can be a secondary pick, while Over 3.5 remains risky (≈40%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FCSB has a clear edge in key metrics: their home goals per game average is 2.0 versus 1.0 for Farul, the home xG is 2.46 compared to the visitors’ 1.91, and average shots on target are 10.0 versus 4.0, indicating higher quality chances for the hosts. In the last five matches FCSB led at the break in 60% of games (3/5) and averaged 1.4 goals by halftime, while Farul have 0.0 first-half goals and 0% leads at the break in that period, so a scenario with the hosts leading after 45 minutes is strong. The full-time outcome also favors the hosts: FCSB have 2.4 average points in the last five matches and an 80% win rate (4/5), whereas Farul have 1.4 points and 40% wins, and the season home points average is 3.0 vs 0.0 for away. Additionally, FCSB’s shot conversion is 10.0% versus Farul’s 5.0%, and the season clean sheet rate for the hosts is 100% compared to 0% for the visitors, which increases the likelihood that FCSB will maintain the lead and win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | SSC Farul | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FCSB is 100% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - FCSB · 1.5 pts / game - SSC Farul
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - FCSB · 1.5 goals / game - SSC Farul
FCSB scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while SSC Farul keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).
SSC Farul scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCSB
Over / Under - SSC Farul
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 500% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / game - FCSB · 0.5 pts / game - SSC Farul
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SSC Farul - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCSB
SSC Farul
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | SSC Farul | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 43% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FCSB's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against SSC Farul. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs SSC Farul?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 2:2 SSC Farul. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and SSC Farul?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FCSB won 2, SSC Farul won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs SSC Farul?
FCSB score 2.00 goals per game on average and SSC Farul 1.50. The Liga I average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 0% of FCSB's matches and 50% of SSC Farul's.
What form are FCSB and SSC Farul in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and SSC Farul 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs SSC Farul?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.