FCSB vs UTA Arad: match statistics
FCSB vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCSB played against UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Arena Naţională. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
FCSB has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. UTA Arad has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
FCSB scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 0.83. UTA Arad scores 0.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.38 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of FCSB's games and 33% of UTA Arad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FCSB has the higher season xG average, 2.00 to 1.60 per game. FCSB takes 18.2 shots per game, while UTA Arad takes 16.2.
First-half and second-half trends
FCSB leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. UTA Arad leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCSB's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For UTA Arad, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.38 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FCSB are clear favorites, having won 67% of their home matches without suffering a defeat, while UTA Arad have lost every away fixture. The hosts average 2.33 goals at home with an xG of 2.01, registering 18.33 shots and 6.33 shots on target per match. UTA score just 0.33 goals away from home, have failed to find the net in 67% of their appearances, and have a very low 2% shot conversion rate. The visitors’ defense concedes an average of 2.33 goals away from home and have not kept a single clean sheet, which should allow FCSB to create numerous clear-cut chances. Although FCSB’s form over their last five matches has not been ideal, UTA’s six-match winless run and three consecutive away defeats strongly favor the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is primarily undermined by UTA Arad’s low attacking efficiency. They average just 0.33 goals per match this season and have failed to score in 67% of their games. FCSB keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concede only 0.67 goals on average, which significantly limits the visitors’ chances of scoring. The seasonal BTTS rate stands at 33% for both teams, compared with 43% across the league, so the historical signal also points toward a scenario in which at least one team fails to score. The last five matches provide some arguments in favor of goals, as FCSB conceded 1.8 goals per game, but UTA scored only 0.6 goals during this period. The hosts create an average of 1.68 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.53 xG, so an FCSB win to nil appears more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
FCSB average 0.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded at home, while also keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches, which significantly limits UTA’s attacking potential. Away from home, the visitors score only 0.33 goals per match, although their defense allows as many as 2.33 goals, so the largest share of the projected goals belongs to the hosts. The chance-quality data is higher, with average xG of 1.68 for FCSB and 1.53 for UTA, but a very low shot conversion rate of 4% and 2%, respectively, reduces the expected number of actual goals. In their last five matches, FCSB averaged 3.0 total goals per game, while UTA averaged only 1.6, and the 3.5-goal line stayed Under in 67% of matches for both teams. The projected total of 2.30 goals points primarily toward an Under 3.5 goals bet, which leaves a safe margin for a 2:1 or 3:0 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: both teams were level after 45 minutes in 2 of their 3 previous meetings, equating to 67% of cases, while the figure stands at 60% for each side across their last five matches. FCSB and UTA have averaged no goals scored before the break, further supporting a cautious start. After half-time, the advantage should shift to the hosts, as FCSB have not conceded a second-half goal at home, whereas UTA concede an average of 2.0 goals in second halves away from home. FCSB’s attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.68, compared with UTA’s average xG conceded of 1.36, while the visitors have lost all their away matches and allow opponents to score 2.33 goals per game. The X/1 scenario best combines a likely goalless or evenly matched opening with a clear defensive downturn for UTA after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 21% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.15 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FCSB is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - FCSB · 0.6 pts / game - UTA Arad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 200% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - FCSB · 0.5 goals / game - UTA Arad
FCSB is 81% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - FCSB · 1.5 goals / game - UTA Arad
FCSB scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
UTA Arad scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 games), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCSB
Over / Under - UTA Arad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 124% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - FCSB · 0.67 pts / game - UTA Arad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
UTA Arad - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCSB
UTA Arad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.33 | 2.38 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 43% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 33% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FCSB's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against UTA Arad. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs UTA Arad?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 1:3 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and UTA Arad?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FCSB won 3, UTA Arad won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs UTA Arad?
FCSB score 1.50 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 0.50. The Liga I average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 33% of FCSB's matches and 33% of UTA Arad's.
What form are FCSB and UTA Arad in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and UTA Arad 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs UTA Arad?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


