Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 4half-time 1:1
Cercle Brugge crest
Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FCV Dender EH played against Cercle Brugge in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Recent form

FCV Dender EH has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Cercle Brugge has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

FCV Dender EH scores 0.81 goals per game and allows 1.66. Cercle Brugge scores 1.38 and allows 1.53. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of FCV Dender EH's games and 63% of Cercle Brugge's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 53%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cercle Brugge has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.27 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 10.9 shots per game, while Cercle Brugge takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Cercle Brugge leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.53 after halftime.

When the teams score

FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Cercle Brugge, it is minutes 31-45+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cercle Brugge is the favorite for this fixture: they average 1.38 goals per away match with a shot conversion rate around 11%, whereas FCV Dender EH score only 0.81 goals at home with a 7% conversion. Defensively the visitors perform better — they concede 1.13 goals on average away compared to 1.88 conceded by the hosts at home, and Cercle’s clean sheet rate on the road is 38% versus Dender’s 19%. In terms of chance quality Cercle posts higher average xG (1.45 away vs 1.31 xG for the hosts) and more shots on target (3.94 vs 3.63), translating into 10 goals scored in the last 5 matches compared to Dender’s 5. Form metrics confirm the edge: Cercle averages 1.4 points per match over the last 5, Dender only 0.8, with both teams having conceded 9 goals in that period. Considering superior attacking efficiency, more stable away defense and higher xG, I predict an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes with a 72% vs 28% probability because FCV Dender have a home BTTS of 75% and concede 1.94 goals per game with only 13% clean sheets, promoting goal exchanges. Cercle Brugge have a season BTTS of 50% and 38% clean sheets away, but in their last 5 matches BTTS is 80%, they score 2.0 goals on average (recent xG_for 1.91) and concede 1.8 goals on average, so recent form points to goals from both sides. Additionally, Dender generate higher season xG_for 1.74 vs 1.45, more shots 15.63 vs 12.94 and more shots on target 5.31 vs 3.94, confirming the hosts’ ability to create chances. Considering the league BTTS rate of 54% and the combination of 75% (Dender) and 80% (Cercle in last 5), the ‘Yes’ scenario is statistically stronger.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I expect a total around 3.17 goals: 1.68 for FCV Dender EH (attacking xG 1.74 vs Cercle’s defensive xG conceded 1.62) and 1.49 for Cercle Brugge (attacking xG 1.45 vs hosts’ defensive xG conceded 1.52). Seasonally Dender have 94% of matches over 1.5 goals, Cercle 81%, and Dender matches have seen goals from both sides in 75% of cases (Cercle 50%), which increases the likelihood of scoring. A Poisson model with mean 3.17 yields roughly 82% chance for Over 1.5, about 61% for Over 2.5 and about 39% for Over 3.5; these results align with seasonal rates (Over 2.5: Dender 69% vs Cercle 38%, and in the last 5 matches the away side has 100% Over 2.5). Therefore the strongest and safest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (recommended), Over 2.5 is a moderate option, and Over 3.5 is too risky.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the away team leading at half-time and winning the match: the visitors led at the break in 44% of their season matches and score an average of 1.00 goals in the first half versus 0.69 for the home team. Final- result statistics also favor Cercle: the visitors average 1.5 points per match and have a 38% win rate this season, while the hosts average 0.69 p.p.m. and only 13% wins. Although the home side have a higher xG (1.74 versus 1.45), they concede significantly more goals (1.94 vs 1.13 per match), and the visitors keep a clean sheet in 38% of games, which reduces the likelihood of the hosts maintaining a lead. Additionally, in the last 5 matches the visitors led at half-time in 60% of games versus 20% for the hosts, therefore I assign the highest weight (34%) to the 2/2 combination, with smaller weights reserved for draws and potential home turnarounds after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 3
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
8Shots19
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
2Shots on target12
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.05xG2.47
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
4Corners6
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
54Dangerous attacks60
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
12Fouls10
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
4Cards0
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.81Goals scored / game1.38
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.66Goals allowed / game1.53
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
47%Average possession47%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3.88Shots on target / game4.63
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.91Shots per game14.28
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3.88Shots on target4.63
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
7.4%Shot conversion9.6%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
47%Possession47%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.27xG for1.59
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.75xG against1.57
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedCercle Brugge: Attacking
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cercle Brugge is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.4 pts / game - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH
DLLWL
Season result split
13% W31% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-10-18
0.69 pts / game · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-10
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Cercle Brugge
LLWDW
Season result split
25% W34% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cercle Brugge is 70% better for: goals scored per game.

0.81 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.38 goals / game - Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.66 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.53 goals / game - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 63% of games (20 of 32 meczów), while Cercle Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).

Cercle Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Cercle Brugge scores in 78% of games (25 of 32 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)44
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
53Goals conceded (season)49
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
2.47Average goals per game2.91
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
5Goals scored (last 5)10
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal78%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
19%2 goals38%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0%3 goals16%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0%4 goals6%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal75%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
53%2 goals53%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
22%3 goals19%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
6%4 goals6%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3%BTTS in both halves6%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
13%Scored in both halves16%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
60%BTTS - last 580%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cercle Brugge is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.25 pts / game - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
16% leading53% draw31% trailing
Cercle Brugge - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.25
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.84
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.59
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
53%Clean sheet before half-time41%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
66%No goal before half-time53%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per game (2nd half)1.09
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.31
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
34%Clean sheet after half-time47%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
59%No goal after half-time53%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

19% W25% D56% L
32
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 13%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cercle Brugge - second-half results

22% W44% D34% L
40
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 25%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cercle Brugge - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
8
46-60
3
12
61-75
6
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Cercle Brugge
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
6
10
16-30
15
10
31-45
4
12
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Cercle Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaCercle Brugge
Average goals per game 2.472.61 2.91
Both teams scored 56%54% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%48% 53%
Clean sheets 19%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 59%70% 84%
Goal after half-time 81%75% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.23
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardAlireza Jahanbakhsh Jirandeh
  2. FCV Dender EHYellow cardFabrice Sambu Mansoni
  3. Cercle BruggeGoalMakaya Ibrahima Diaby
  4. Cercle BruggeGoalEdan DiopAssist: Geoffrey Kondo
  5. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Guillaume DietschOff: Gauthier Gallon
  6. FCV Dender EHYellow cardMalcolm Viltard
  7. Cercle BruggeSubstitutionOn: Royer CaicedoOff: Ibrahim Diakité
  8. Cercle BruggeSubstitutionOn: Nils De WildeOff: Hannes Van der Bruggen
  9. FCV Dender EHYellow cardNail Moutha-Sebtaoui

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jan BoterbergMatches officiated: 24
4.08Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 228%Home wins33%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from FCV Dender EH's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Cercle Brugge. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Cercle Brugge KSV
0 : 0
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
0 : 0
Cercle Brugge KSV

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:4 Cercle Brugge. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FCV Dender EH and Cercle Brugge?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCV Dender EH won 0, Cercle Brugge won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

FCV Dender EH score 0.81 goals per game on average and Cercle Brugge 1.38. The Pro League average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 63% of Cercle Brugge's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Cercle Brugge in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cercle Brugge 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.