Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 4half-time 1:1
Cercle Brugge crest
Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH play Cercle Brugge in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Cercle Brugge: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 0.86 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Cercle Brugge scores 1.47 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 61%, Cercle Brugge 67%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 56%, Cercle Brugge 58%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Cercle Brugge has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.26. FCV Dender EH: 10.8 shots per match, Cercle Brugge: 14.3.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.42. Cercle Brugge: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). Cercle Brugge: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Cercle Brugge is the favorite for this fixture: they average 1.38 goals per away match with a shot conversion rate around 11%, whereas FCV Dender EH score only 0.81 goals at home with a 7% conversion. Defensively the visitors perform better — they concede 1.13 goals on average away compared to 1.88 conceded by the hosts at home, and Cercle’s clean sheet rate on the road is 38% versus Dender’s 19%. In terms of chance quality Cercle posts higher average xG (1.45 away vs 1.31 xG for the hosts) and more shots on target (3.94 vs 3.63), translating into 10 goals scored in the last 5 matches compared to Dender’s 5. Form metrics confirm the edge: Cercle averages 1.4 points per match over the last 5, Dender only 0.8, with both teams having conceded 9 goals in that period. Considering superior attacking efficiency, more stable away defense and higher xG, I predict an away victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
8Shots19
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
2Shots on target12
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.05xG2.47
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
4Corners6
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
54Dangerous attacks60
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
12Fouls10
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
4Cards0
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.86Goals scored / match1.47
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.72Goals conceded / match1.61
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
48%Average possession48%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3.78Shots on target / match4.94
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.75Shots per match14.31
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3.78Shots on target4.94
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
8%Shot conversion10.3%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
48%Possession48%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.26xG for1.62
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.76xG against1.55
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedCercle Brugge: Attacking
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cercle Brugge is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.8 pts / match - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH
LLLWL
Season result split
14% W28% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-21
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Cercle Brugge
WWWLL
Season result split
28% W31% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-15
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cercle Brugge is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.47 goals / match - Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.61 goals / match - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while Cercle Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

Cercle Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Cercle Brugge scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).

31Goals scored (season)53
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
62Goals conceded (season)58
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
2.58Average goals in match3.08
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
6Goals scored (last 5)12
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal81%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
19%2 goals42%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0%3 goals17%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0%4 goals8%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal78%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
56%2 goals53%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
22%3 goals22%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
8%4 goals8%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time22%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3%BTTS in both halves6%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
11%Scored in both halves22%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
100%BTTS - last 580%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cercle Brugge is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.39 pts / match - Cercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Cercle Brugge - half-time state
36% leading31% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.39
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.86
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.56
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
47%Clean sheet before half-time44%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
61%No goal before half-time47%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)1.08
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.53
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
36%Clean sheet after half-time44%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge
61%No goal after half-time50%
FCV Dender EHCercle Brugge

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

17% W31% R53% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 14%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cercle Brugge - second-half results

22% W42% R36% P
50
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 28%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Cercle Brugge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
3
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
5
10
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Cercle Brugge
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
8
10
16-30
16
11
31-45
6
15
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Cercle Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaCercle Brugge
Average goals in match 2.582.67 3.08
Both teams scored 61%54% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%49% 58%
Clean sheets 17%27% 22%
Goal before half-time 64%71% 86%
Goal after half-time 78%75% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): FCV Dender EH 0 - 2 - 1 Cercle Brugge. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:4 Cercle Brugge. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FCV Dender EH and Cercle Brugge?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FCV Dender EH won 0, Cercle Brugge won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

FCV Dender EH score 0.86 goals per game on average and Cercle Brugge 1.47. The Pro League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 67% of Cercle Brugge's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Cercle Brugge in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Cercle Brugge 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Cercle Brugge: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.