FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FCV Dender EH played against Club Brugge in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on December 14, 2025. Final score: 1:5.

Recent form

FCV Dender EH has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Club Brugge has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

FCV Dender EH scores 0.82 goals per game and allows 1.59. Club Brugge scores 1.41 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of FCV Dender EH's games and 41% of Club Brugge's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 35%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Club Brugge has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.21 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 10.3 shots per game, while Club Brugge takes 16.5.

First-half and second-half trends

FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Club Brugge leads at halftime in 18% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Club Brugge, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 4
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
6Shots23
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1Shots on target9
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.68xG2.69
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0Corners3
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
30Dangerous attacks85
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
6Fouls6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0Cards0
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.82Goals scored / game1.41
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1.59Goals allowed / game1
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
47%Average possession62%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
3.76Shots on target / game5.12
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.35Shots per game16.53
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
3.76Shots on target5.12
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
8%Shot conversion8.5%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
47%Possession62%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1.21xG for1.85
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1.69xG against1.36
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedClub Brugge: Dominant
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCV Dender EH is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.2 pts / game - Club Brugge

FCV Dender EH
LDWDW
Season result split
12% W35% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-9
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-4-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Club Brugge
WLWLL
Season result split
59% W12% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-5
1.88 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Club Brugge is 72% better for: goals scored per game.

0.82 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.41 goals / game - Club Brugge

Club Brugge is 59% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.59 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1 goals / game - Club Brugge

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: mixed

FCV Dender EH scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while Club Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 meczów).

Club Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)24
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
27Goals conceded (season)17
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
2.41Average goals per game2.41
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
9Goals scored (last 5)5
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal82%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
24%2 goals41%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0%3 goals6%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0%4 goals6%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal59%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
53%2 goals18%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
18%3 goals12%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0%4 goals6%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0%BTTS in both halves12%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
18%Scored in both halves24%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
100%BTTS - last 540%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCV Dender EH is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1 pts / game - Club Brugge

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing
Club Brugge - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per game (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.41
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.76Average goals (1st half)0.94
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
71%No goal before half-time65%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per game (2nd half)1.94
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)1
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1.12Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.47
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
24%Clean sheet after half-time65%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge
53%No goal after half-time29%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

18% W18% D65% L
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 12%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Club Brugge - second-half results

53% W35% D12% L
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding328%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Club Brugge - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Club Brugge
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
4
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.89
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Club Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaClub Brugge
Average goals per game 2.412.49 2.41
Both teams scored 59%53% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%44% 35%
Clean sheets 12%27% 41%
Goal before half-time 59%68% 59%
Goal after half-time 88%74% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHGoalBruny NsimbaAssist: Fabio Ferraro
  2. Club BruggeSubstitutionOn: Bjorn MeijerOff: Joaquin Seys
  3. Club BruggeGoalChristos Tzolis
  4. Club BruggeGoalChristos Tzolis
  5. Club BruggeSubstitutionOn: Romeo VermantOff: Nicolo Tresoldi
  6. Club BruggeGoalRomeo VermantAssist: Aleksandar Stanković
  7. Club BruggeGoalRomeo VermantAssist: Hugo Thierry Siquet
  8. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Alireza Jahanbakhsh JirandehOff: Bruny Nsimba
  9. Club BruggeSubstitutionOn: Hugo Vegard VetlesenOff: Raphael Onyedika Nwadike

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Bert VerbekeMatches officiated: 21
3.33Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins10%Draws52%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from FCV Dender EH's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Club Brugge. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Club Brugge KV
2 : 1
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:5 Club Brugge. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge?

FCV Dender EH score 0.82 goals per game on average and Club Brugge 1.41. The Pro League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 59% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 41% of Club Brugge's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Club Brugge in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Club Brugge 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.