FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: match statistics
KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.
FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCV Dender EH played against KAA Gent in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
FCV Dender EH has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. KAA Gent has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
FCV Dender EH scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.66. KAA Gent scores 1.59 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's games and 59% of KAA Gent's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 59%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KAA Gent has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.27 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 10.8 shots per game, while KAA Gent takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. KAA Gent leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.93 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For KAA Gent, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCV Dender EH | KAA Gent | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KAA Gent is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.8 pts / game - KAA Gent
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KAA Gent is 101% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.59 goals / game - KAA Gent
KAA Gent is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.66 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.45 goals / game - KAA Gent
FCV Dender EH scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while KAA Gent keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 meczów).
KAA Gent scores in 79% of games (23 of 29 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCV Dender EH
Over / Under - KAA Gent
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.24 pts / game - KAA Gent
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCV Dender EH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KAA Gent - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCV Dender EH
KAA Gent
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| FCV Dender EH | Liga | KAA Gent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.45 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 46% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from FCV Dender EH's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against KAA Gent. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?
The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:3 KAA Gent. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?
FCV Dender EH score 0.79 goals per game on average and KAA Gent 1.59. The Pro League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 59% of KAA Gent's.
What form are FCV Dender EH and KAA Gent in?
Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and KAA Gent 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.