FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk: match statistics
KRC Genk appears to be the favorite for this match despite playing away. FCV Dender EH is showing very poor home form with only 9% of wins at home, averaging just 0.64 goals per match and failing to score in 55% of their home games. Genk, on the other hand, boasts a significantly better offense (1.27 goals on average away) and holds an advantage in ball possession (61% vs 50%) and shot efficiency (5.55 accurate shots per match). The difference in league position (16th for the hosts vs 11th for the visitors) along with Genk's significantly better xG stats (1.63 vs the hosts' 1.14) further support the away side. The high draw rate of both teams (36% for both hosts and visitors) also justifies a significant probability of a draw, but Genk's qualitative advantage makes their victory the most likely scenario.
FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCV Dender EH played against KRC Genk in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
FCV Dender EH has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. KRC Genk has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
FCV Dender EH scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 1.55. KRC Genk scores 1.32 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's games and 82% of KRC Genk's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 59%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KRC Genk has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 1.22 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 10.4 shots per game, while KRC Genk takes 16.2.
First-half and second-half trends
FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For KRC Genk, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KRC Genk appears to be the favorite for this match despite playing away. FCV Dender EH is showing very poor home form with only 9% of wins at home, averaging just 0.64 goals per match and failing to score in 55% of their home games. Genk, on the other hand, boasts a significantly better offense (1.27 goals on average away) and holds an advantage in ball possession (61% vs 50%) and shot efficiency (5.55 accurate shots per match). The difference in league position (16th for the hosts vs 11th for the visitors) along with Genk's significantly better xG stats (1.63 vs the hosts' 1.14) further support the away side. The high draw rate of both teams (36% for both hosts and visitors) also justifies a significant probability of a draw, but Genk's qualitative advantage makes their victory the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCV Dender EH | KRC Genk | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FCV Dender EH is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 0.6 pts / game - KRC Genk
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KRC Genk is 71% better for: goals scored per game.
0.77 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.32 goals / game - KRC Genk
FCV Dender EH scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while KRC Genk keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 meczów).
KRC Genk scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCV Dender EH
Over / Under - KRC Genk
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCV Dender EH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KRC Genk - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCV Dender EH
KRC Genk
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| FCV Dender EH | Liga | KRC Genk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.32 | 2.52 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 45% | 43% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 27% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 72% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from FCV Dender EH's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against KRC Genk. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk?
The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:2 KRC Genk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk?
FCV Dender EH score 0.77 goals per game on average and KRC Genk 1.32. The Pro League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 82% of KRC Genk's.
What form are FCV Dender EH and KRC Genk in?
Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KRC Genk 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk?
The statistical background for FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.